Skip to content

CBT-based Internet Intervention for Adults With Tinnitus in the United States

Cognitive Behavior Therapy Based Self-help Delivered Via the Internet for Tinnitus Sufferers: Efficacy Trial in the U.S. Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04004260
Enrollment
315
Registered
2019-07-02
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2020-07-03
Last updated
2021-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Brief summary

Nearly 50 million people in the U.S. experience tinnitus, of which about 20 million people have burdensome chronic tinnitus. Tinnitus can be very debilitating as many aspects of daily life can be affected, such as sleep, mood, and concentration. Currently, there is no cure for tinnitus. Pharmacological or sound-therapy based interventions are sometimes provided, but may be of limited value to certain individuals. Research suggests that Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) based approaches have the most evidence of effectiveness in the management of tinnitus. However, CBT is rarely offered in the U.S. (less than 1%), partly attributed to a lack of trained professionals who can deliver CBT. To improve access to CBT for tinnitus, and online CBT program has been developed. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and efficacy of a CBT Internet-based intervention for adults with tinnitus in the United States.

Detailed description

Objective: This study aims to determine the feasibility and efficacy of an Internet-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy (ICBT) in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United States. Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that ICBT will result in reduced tinnitus-related distress, decreased sleep disturbance, decreased anxiety and depression, and improved health-related quality of life in a treatment group as compared with adults in the weekly check-in control-group in the U.S. population. The investigators also hypothesize that these results will be stable in both short- and long-term post-intervention. Design: A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), with a one-year follow-up design will be used to evaluate the efficacy of ICBT on tinnitus distress. Setting: This will be an Internet-based study for adults with tinnitus living in the State of Texas, USA. Participants: Eligible participants will include adults with tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months with internet access and no major medical or psychiatric conditions. 80 participants will be recruited for each group and will be randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomization schedule by an independent research assistant after being pre-stratified for language and tinnitus severity. Intervention: The intervention offered is a guided CTB-based internet intervention (ICBT), providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8-week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments are given to practice techniques learned. Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS), Tinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS.

Interventions

The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8-week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments are given to practice techniques learned.

Sponsors

Lamar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The experimental group will initially undergo the ICBT intervention while the control group are monitored weekly. Once the experimental group has completed the intervention, the control group will undertake the ICBT intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. aged 18 years and older living in the State of Texas, USA; 2. the ability to read and type in English or Spanish; 3. no barriers to using a computer (e.g. no significant fine motor control or visual problems); 4. Internet and e-mail access and the ability to use it; 5. commitment to completing the program; 6. completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires; 7. agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups; 8. understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same; 9. be available for 12 months after starting the study to complete a 1-year follow-up questionnaire; 10. suffering with experiencing tinnitus for a minimum period of 3 months; and 11. tinnitus outcome measure scores indicating the need for tinnitus care \[25 or above on the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)\].

Exclusion criteria

1. reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions; 2. reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which has not been investigated medically; 3. tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation; and 4. undergoing any other tinnitus therapy while participating in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-interventionThe Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a 25-item questionnaire that evaluates tinnitus distress. The total possible score ranges from 0-to-100 with higher scores indicate more severe tinnitus distress (i.e., worse outcome). Scores \>25 indicate tinnitus is a significant problem requiring tinnitus intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionBaseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses depression severity. Responses are marked on a four-point Likert scale (0 to 3). The total score can range from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating more severe depression (i.e., worse outcome).
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyBaseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of anxiety. Responses are marked on a four-point Likert scale (0 to 3). The total score can range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety (i.e., worse outcome).
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaBaseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of insomnia. Responses are marked on a five-point Likert scale (0 to 4). The total score can range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia (i.e., worse outcome).
Tinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionBaseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)Tinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ) is a 26-item questionnaire that assesses positive and negative cognitions associated with tinnitus. The first 13 items refer to negative thoughts and the second 13 items refer to positive thoughts. Responses are marked on a five-point Likert scale (0 to 4). The negative items (1-13) are scored 0-4, whereas the positive items (14-26) are reverse-scored: 4-0. The scoring procedure involves the simple addition of the number circled by the respondent for items 1-13 and the addition of reverse-scored items 14-26. The total score of the TCQ has a potential range from 0 to 104. A high score represents a greater tendency to engage in negative cognitions (i.e., worse outcome) in response to tinnitus and low engagement in positive cognitions.
Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-interventionTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) is a 10-item questionnaire that helps in determining how much of a patient's complaint about tinnitus is due to a hearing problem and how much is due specifically to the tinnitus. THS has three sections/subscales (A, B, and C). Section A consists of four items that address common tinnitus problems. Section B contains four items that address hearing. Section C, which includes two items, which focus on sound tolerance problems and the ability to participate in group therapy. Responses for each item can range from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (very big problem). The total THS score can range from 0 to 40. However, the scores for this specific sub-scale can range from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating more tinnitus problem (i.e., worse outcome).
Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-interventionTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) is a 10-item questionnaire that helps in determining how much of a patient's complaint about tinnitus is due to a hearing problem and how much is due specifically to the tinnitus. THS has three sections/subscales (A, B, and C). Section A consists of four items that address common tinnitus problems. Section B contains four items that address hearing. Section C, which includes two items, which focus on sound tolerance problems and the ability to participate in group therapy. Responses for each item can range from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (very big problem). However, the scores for this specific sub-scale can range from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating more hearing problem (i.e., worse outcome).
Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-interventionTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) is a 10-item questionnaire that helps in determining how much of a patient's complaint about tinnitus is due to a hearing problem and how much is due specifically to the tinnitus. THS has three sections/subscales (A, B, and C). Section A consists of four items that address common tinnitus problems. Section B contains four items that address hearing. Section C, which includes two items, which focus on sound tolerance problems and the ability to participate in group therapy. Responses for each item can range from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (very big problem). However, the scores for this specific sub-scale can range from 0 to 8 with higher scores indicating more sound tolerance problem (i.e., worse outcome).
EuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-interventionEQ-5D-5L VAS is a single questionnaire that evaluates the health-related quality of life. Responses are marked on a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicate the higher overall health-related quality of life (i.e., better outcome).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

315 participants completed the informed consent and completed the pre-intervention screening measures. However, 157 participants were excluded (49 participants reported high depression and/or positive answers to self-harm questions, 37 participants had low tinnitus severity, 71 participants resided outside the state/country) and the remaining 158 were included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Group
The intervention offered is a guided Internet-based CBT intervention. The intervention is similar to a self-help program, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is a 8-week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments are given to practice the techniques learned. Internet-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8-week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments are given to practice techniques learned.
79
Weekly check-in Control Group
The weekly check-in control group will be monitored weekly by means of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-Screening version (THI-S) and the Tinnitus Qualities Questionnaire (TQQ). Once the experimental group completes the ICBT intervention, the control group undertake the same ICBT intervention. Internet-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy: The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8-week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments are given to practice techniques learned.
79
Total158

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not engage in intervention1317
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2212
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental GroupTotalWeekly check-in Control Group
Age, Continuous56 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
58 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants20 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
70 Participants138 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
74 Participants148 Participants74 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
79 Participants158 Participants79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants80 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants78 Participants38 Participants
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)54.04 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.85
53.98 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.53
53.93 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.32

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 790 / 79
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 790 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 790 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus Distress

The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is a 25-item questionnaire that evaluates tinnitus distress. The total possible score ranges from 0-to-100 with higher scores indicate more severe tinnitus distress (i.e., worse outcome). Scores \>25 indicate tinnitus is a significant problem requiring tinnitus intervention.

Time frame: T0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-intervention

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT0: Baseline54.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.85
Experimental GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT1: Post-intervention for experimental group29.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Experimental GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT2: Post-intervention for the control group25.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.46
Experimental GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT3: 2-month post-intervention25.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.46
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT3: 2-month post-intervention32.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT0: Baseline53.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.32
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT2: Post-intervention for the control group38.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.36
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Functional Index (TFI) - Measure of Tinnitus DistressT1: Post-intervention for experimental group47.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.25
Secondary

EuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of Life

EQ-5D-5L VAS is a single questionnaire that evaluates the health-related quality of life. Responses are marked on a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicate the higher overall health-related quality of life (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: T0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-intervention

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT0: Baseline78.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.14
Experimental GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT2: Post-intervention for the control group80.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.16
Experimental GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group79.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.66
Experimental GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT3: 2-month post-intervention80.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.16
Weekly check-in Control GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group76.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Weekly check-in Control GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT0: Baseline75.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.96
Weekly check-in Control GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT3: 2-month post-intervention78.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.44
Weekly check-in Control GroupEuroQol EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores; Measure of Health-related Quality of LifeT2: Post-intervention for the control group78.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.29
Secondary

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of Anxiety

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of anxiety. Responses are marked on a four-point Likert scale (0 to 3). The total score can range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT0: Baseline5.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.22
Experimental GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
Experimental GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT3: 2-month post-intervention3.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
Experimental GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT2: Post-intervention for the control group3.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
Weekly check-in Control GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT3: 2-month post-intervention5.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
Weekly check-in Control GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group5.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.59
Weekly check-in Control GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT2: Post-intervention for the control group3.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
Weekly check-in Control GroupGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7); Measure of AnxietyT0: Baseline5.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.29
Secondary

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of Insomnia

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of insomnia. Responses are marked on a five-point Likert scale (0 to 4). The total score can range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT3: 2-months post-intervention4.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group5.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT0: Baseline10.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.99
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT2: Post-intervention for the control group4.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Weekly check-in Control GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT0: Baseline9.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.71
Weekly check-in Control GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT3: 2-months post-intervention5.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.24
Weekly check-in Control GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT2: Post-intervention for the control group7.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
Weekly check-in Control GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI); Measure of InsomniaT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group9.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.39
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of Depression

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses depression severity. Responses are marked on a four-point Likert scale (0 to 3). The total score can range from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating more severe depression (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group4.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.74
Experimental GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT0: Baseline5.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.17
Experimental GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT2: Post-intervention for the control group3.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.01
Experimental GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT3: 2-month post-intervention3.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.01
Weekly check-in Control GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT3: 2-month post-intervention3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.73
Weekly check-in Control GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group5.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.35
Weekly check-in Control GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT2: Post-intervention for the control group4.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Weekly check-in Control GroupPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Measure of DepressionT0: Baseline5.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing Problem

Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) is a 10-item questionnaire that helps in determining how much of a patient's complaint about tinnitus is due to a hearing problem and how much is due specifically to the tinnitus. THS has three sections/subscales (A, B, and C). Section A consists of four items that address common tinnitus problems. Section B contains four items that address hearing. Section C, which includes two items, which focus on sound tolerance problems and the ability to participate in group therapy. Responses for each item can range from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (very big problem). However, the scores for this specific sub-scale can range from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating more hearing problem (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: T0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-intervention

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT0: Baseline6.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT2: Post-intervention for the control group3.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT3: 2-month post-intervention3.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group3.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.65
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT3: 2-month post-intervention4.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT0: Baseline7.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group7.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Hearing Sub-scale; Measure of Hearing ProblemT2: Post-intervention for the control group6.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.05
Secondary

Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound Tolerance

Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) is a 10-item questionnaire that helps in determining how much of a patient's complaint about tinnitus is due to a hearing problem and how much is due specifically to the tinnitus. THS has three sections/subscales (A, B, and C). Section A consists of four items that address common tinnitus problems. Section B contains four items that address hearing. Section C, which includes two items, which focus on sound tolerance problems and the ability to participate in group therapy. Responses for each item can range from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (very big problem). However, the scores for this specific sub-scale can range from 0 to 8 with higher scores indicating more sound tolerance problem (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: T0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-intervention

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT2: Post-intervention for the control group.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT3: 2-month post-intervention.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT0: Baseline.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT3: 2-month post-intervention.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT2: Post-intervention for the control group.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Sound Tolerance Sub-scale; Measure of Sound ToleranceT0: Baseline.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus Problem

Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) is a 10-item questionnaire that helps in determining how much of a patient's complaint about tinnitus is due to a hearing problem and how much is due specifically to the tinnitus. THS has three sections/subscales (A, B, and C). Section A consists of four items that address common tinnitus problems. Section B contains four items that address hearing. Section C, which includes two items, which focus on sound tolerance problems and the ability to participate in group therapy. Responses for each item can range from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (very big problem). The total THS score can range from 0 to 40. However, the scores for this specific sub-scale can range from 0 to 16 with higher scores indicating more tinnitus problem (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: T0: Baseline, T1: Post-intervention after the experimental group completed the intervention, T2: Post-intervention after control group completed intervention; T3: 2-months post-intervention

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT0: Baseline5.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group2.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT2: Post-intervention for the control group2.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Experimental GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT3: 2-month post-intervention2.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT3: 2-month post-intervention2.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.68
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT0: Baseline5.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT2: Post-intervention for the control group3.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS) - Tinnitus Sub-scale; Measure of Tinnitus ProblemT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group5.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.82
Secondary

Tinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus Cognition

Tinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ) is a 26-item questionnaire that assesses positive and negative cognitions associated with tinnitus. The first 13 items refer to negative thoughts and the second 13 items refer to positive thoughts. Responses are marked on a five-point Likert scale (0 to 4). The negative items (1-13) are scored 0-4, whereas the positive items (14-26) are reverse-scored: 4-0. The scoring procedure involves the simple addition of the number circled by the respondent for items 1-13 and the addition of reverse-scored items 14-26. The total score of the TCQ has a potential range from 0 to 104. A high score represents a greater tendency to engage in negative cognitions (i.e., worse outcome) in response to tinnitus and low engagement in positive cognitions.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-intervention (8-weeks from baseline), 2-months post-intervention (16 weeks from baseline)

Population: 79 participants started the trial in both the experimental group and control group 41 participants from the experimental group and 66 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T137 participants from the experimental group and 47 from the control group completed the post-intervention measure at T2 37 participants from the experimental group and 25 from the control group completed the 2-month post-intervention measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT0: Baseline39.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.38
Experimental GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group26.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.58
Experimental GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT2: Post-intervention for the control group40.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.72
Experimental GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT3: 2-month post-intervention40.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.72
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT3: 2-month post-intervention28.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT0: Baseline37.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.54
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT2: Post-intervention for the control group32.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.54
Weekly check-in Control GroupTinnitus Cognition Questionnaire (TCQ); Measure of Tinnitus CognitionT1: Post-intervention for the experimental group26.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026