Skip to content

Aflibercept for Retinopathy of Prematurity - Intravitreal Injection Versus Laser Therapy

Open-label, Randomized, Two-Arm, Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravitreal (IVT) Aflibercept Compared to Laser Photocoagulation in Patients With Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04004208
Acronym
FIREFLEYE
Enrollment
113
Registered
2019-07-01
Start date
2019-09-25
Completion date
2021-02-12
Last updated
2022-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how well aflibercept works in babies with ROP, comparing it with laser therapy. The study also has the objective to demonstrate how safe aflibercept is when used in babies, and describe how the drug moves into, through and out of the body.

Interventions

Solution in a sterile glass vial, Dose A, IVT injection.

PROCEDURELaser photocoagulation

Transpupillary conventional laser ablative therapy

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 32 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gestational age at birth ≤ 32 weeks or birth weight ≤ 1500 g * Subjects with treatment-naïve ROP classified according to the International Classification for ROP in at least one eye as: * Zone I Stage 1 plus, or 2 plus, or 3 non-plus or 3 plus, or * Zone II Stage 2 plus or 3 plus, or * Aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP) * Weight at baseline (day of treatment) ≥ 800 g * Signed informed consent from parent(s)/legally authorized representative(s), which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected chromosomal abnormality, genetic disorder or syndrome * Previous exposure to any IVT or systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, including maternal exposure during pregnancy and/or during breastfeeding * Clinically significant neurological disease (eg, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or higher, periventricular leukomalacia, congenital brain lesions significantly impairing optic nerve function, severe hydrocephalus with significantly increased intracranial pressure) * Pediatric conditions rendering the infant ineligible for study intervention at baseline or for repeated blood draws as evaluated by a NICU specialist and a study ophthalmologist * Presence of active ocular infection within 5 days of the first treatment * Advanced stages of ROP with partial or complete retinal detachment (ROP Stages 4 and 5) * ROP involving only Zone III * Ocular abnormalities that may interfere with the administration of study intervention or assessment of the study primary endpoint * Postnatal treatment with oral or intravenous corticosteroids at an equivalent dose of prednisone ≥ 1 mg/kg/day for \> 2 weeks within 14 days of the first study intervention * Previous surgical or nonsurgical treatment for ROP (IVT anti-VEGF injection, ablative laser therapy, cryotherapy, and vitrectomy) * Participation of the subject or the mother in other clinical trials requiring administration of investigational treatments (other than vitamins and minerals) at the time of screening, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of administration of the previous study drug, whichever is longer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Absence of Active ROP and Unfavorable Structural OutcomesAt 24 weeks after starting study treatmentActive ROP was defined as ROP requiring treatment. Unfavorable structural outcomes included retinal detachment, macular dragging, macular fold, or retrolental opacity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Recurrence of ROPFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24.Participants with recurrence of ROP were defined as subjects requiring re-treatment or rescue treatment after in the past the absence of treatment-requiring active ROP had been confirmed by the investigator.
Exploration of ROP Activity Scale Proposed by the International Neonatal ConsortiumFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24.Eyes were evaluated for change in ROP activity scale proposed by the International Neonatal Consortium (2018). ROP Activity Scale value range is from 0 to 22. Value 0 to 7 are considered mild, 8 to 12 are moderate, and 13 to 22 are severe. Value 0 means the best and value 22 means the worst. Eyes evaluation was done at baseline and each visit.
Percentage of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From baseline (treatment) up to week 24A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that was observed or reported after the first and not later than 30 days after the last administration of study treatment. Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Ocular TEAEs in treated eyes only were reported
Percentage of Participants With Ocular Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From baseline (treatment) up to week 24Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Ocular SAEs in treated eyes only were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Systemic TEAEsFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that was observed or reported after the first and not later than 30 days after the last administration of study treatment. Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Systemic TEAEs only were reported.
Proportion of Participants Requiring Intervention With a Second Treatment ModalityFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24.A second treatment modality for ROP was either rescue treatment or any other surgical or nonsurgical treatment for ROP (e.g. IVT anti-VEGF injection, ablative laser therapy, cryotherapy, or vitrectomy) captured as concomitant medication or surgery after study start.
Concentrations of Free Aflibercept in PlasmaFrom Day 1 up to week 24.Blood samples for determination of aflibercept concentrations in plasma were collected in the aflibercept 0.4 mg arm at Day 1 (within 24 hours after injection), and at weeks 2 and 4, and if feasible also at weeks 8, 12 and 24. Statistics for week 8, 12, 24 not calculated as \> 1/3 of the concentrations were below the lower limit of quantification. Free Aflibercept Concentrations in Plasma were only measured in the Aflibercept 0.4 mg treatment arm.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline (treatment) and 12 weeks after aflibercept injectionImmunogenicity was characterized by anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses in patients in the aflibercept 0.4 mg arm. Serum samples were taken at baseline prior to the injection and at 12 weeks after injection. ADA titers were summarized for 3 categories: Low (titer \<1,000); Moderate (1,000 ≤ titer ≤ 10,000); High (titer \>10,000). ADA in serum were only measured in the Aflibercept 0.4 mg treatment arm.
Number of Participants With Potential Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)At 12 weeks after aflibercept injectionNAb status was evaluated for the samples that were positive in the ADA assay and had sufficient volume to analyze. NAb were only measured in participants with positive ADA in the Aflibercept 0.4 mg treatment arm
Number of Aflibercept AdministrationsFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24.Total number of injections in both eyes.
Number of Laser TreatmentsFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24.Total number of laser treatment in both eyes. If multiple sessions of laser treatment were necessary within 1 week from baseline, they were counted as a single treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Systemic SAEsFrom baseline (treatment) up to week 24Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Systemic SAEs only were reported.

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Czechia, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 64 centers in 27 countries or regions, between 25-SEP-2019 (first participant first visit) and 12-Feb-2021 (last participant last visit).

Pre-assignment details

121 participants were screened. 1 participant was a screen fail and 2 participants were withdrawn by parent/guardian. 118 participants were randomized, 75 participants were randomized to the aflibercept arm and 43 to the laser arm. 113 participants were treated, 5 participants randomized to the laser photocoagulation arm were withdrawn before receiving any study intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aflibercept 0.4 mg
One intravitreal injection of aflibercept 0.4 mg (0.01 mL) per eligible eye at baseline (treatment), with up to 2 re-injections at the same single dose allowed for each eligible eye if required and interval since last aflibercept injection was 28 or more days. One or both eyes could be treated.
75
Laser Photocoagulation
Laser treatment to each eligible eye at baseline (treatment), with supplementary laser treatments allowed. Multiple sessions within one week from baseline were counted as a single treatment. One or both eyes could be treated.
38
Total113

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyCOVID-19 pandemic10
Overall StudyDeath30
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by parent/guardian11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAflibercept 0.4 mgTotalLaser Photocoagulation
Age, Continuous26.43 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
26.29 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
26 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Age, Customized
85 years and over
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Children (2-11 years)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
From 65-84 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
In utero
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Newborns (0-27 days)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
75 Participants113 Participants38 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian Indian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian: Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Chinese
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
10 Participants16 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Korean
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
55 Participants83 Participants28 Participants
ROP classification by investigator
AP-ROP: Zone I
12 Participants16 Participants4 Participants
ROP classification by investigator
AP-ROP: Zone II
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
ROP classification by investigator
Zone I excluding AP-ROP
15 Participants22 Participants7 Participants
ROP classification by investigator
Zone II excluding AP-ROP
46 Participants72 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants53 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants60 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 750 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 7523 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 7510 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants With Absence of Active ROP and Unfavorable Structural Outcomes

Active ROP was defined as ROP requiring treatment. Unfavorable structural outcomes included retinal detachment, macular dragging, macular fold, or retrolental opacity.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after starting study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgProportion of Participants With Absence of Active ROP and Unfavorable Structural Outcomes0.855 Proportion of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationProportion of Participants With Absence of Active ROP and Unfavorable Structural Outcomes0.821 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Bayesian analysis with non-informative prior distributions. Calculation of two-sided 90% credible interval for the treatment difference (aflibercept - laser photocoagulation).90% CI: [-0.08, 0.162]
Secondary

Concentrations of Free Aflibercept in Plasma

Blood samples for determination of aflibercept concentrations in plasma were collected in the aflibercept 0.4 mg arm at Day 1 (within 24 hours after injection), and at weeks 2 and 4, and if feasible also at weeks 8, 12 and 24. Statistics for week 8, 12, 24 not calculated as \> 1/3 of the concentrations were below the lower limit of quantification. Free Aflibercept Concentrations in Plasma were only measured in the Aflibercept 0.4 mg treatment arm.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to week 24.

Population: The outcome measure was analyzed based on pharmacokinetic analysis set (PKS). The PKS included all participants who received aflibercept treatment at the baseline visit and who had at least one nonmissing PK assessment following the first dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aflibercept 0.4 mgConcentrations of Free Aflibercept in PlasmaWEEK 0, DAY 1480.607 ng/mLStandard Deviation 884.724
Aflibercept 0.4 mgConcentrations of Free Aflibercept in PlasmaWEEK 2218.965 ng/mLStandard Deviation 358.933
Aflibercept 0.4 mgConcentrations of Free Aflibercept in PlasmaWEEK 4133.093 ng/mLStandard Deviation 205.052
Secondary

Exploration of ROP Activity Scale Proposed by the International Neonatal Consortium

Eyes were evaluated for change in ROP activity scale proposed by the International Neonatal Consortium (2018). ROP Activity Scale value range is from 0 to 22. Value 0 to 7 are considered mild, 8 to 12 are moderate, and 13 to 22 are severe. Value 0 means the best and value 22 means the worst. Eyes evaluation was done at baseline and each visit.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aflibercept 0.4 mgExploration of ROP Activity Scale Proposed by the International Neonatal ConsortiumBaseline16.20 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Aflibercept 0.4 mgExploration of ROP Activity Scale Proposed by the International Neonatal ConsortiumChange from baseline to Week 24-15.42 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
Laser PhotocoagulationExploration of ROP Activity Scale Proposed by the International Neonatal ConsortiumBaseline15.63 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
Laser PhotocoagulationExploration of ROP Activity Scale Proposed by the International Neonatal ConsortiumChange from baseline to Week 24-14.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.19
Secondary

Number of Aflibercept Administrations

Total number of injections in both eyes.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Aflibercept Administrations2 aflibercept administrations55 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Aflibercept Administrations1 aflibercept administration4 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Aflibercept Administrations3 aflibercept administrations6 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Aflibercept Administrations4 aflibercept administrations10 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Aflibercept Administrations0 aflibercept administration0 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Aflibercept Administrations4 aflibercept administrations0 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Aflibercept Administrations0 aflibercept administration34 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Aflibercept Administrations1 aflibercept administration0 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Aflibercept Administrations2 aflibercept administrations3 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Aflibercept Administrations3 aflibercept administrations1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Laser Treatments

Total number of laser treatment in both eyes. If multiple sessions of laser treatment were necessary within 1 week from baseline, they were counted as a single treatment.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Laser Treatments0 laser treatment70 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Laser Treatments1 laser treatment3 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Laser Treatments2 laser treatments2 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Laser Treatments3 laser treatments0 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Laser Treatments4 laser treatments0 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Laser Treatments6 laser treatments0 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Laser Treatments4 laser treatments2 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Laser Treatments0 laser treatment0 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Laser Treatments3 laser treatments1 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Laser Treatments1 laser treatment4 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Laser Treatments6 laser treatments1 Participants
Laser PhotocoagulationNumber of Laser Treatments2 laser treatments30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)

Immunogenicity was characterized by anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses in patients in the aflibercept 0.4 mg arm. Serum samples were taken at baseline prior to the injection and at 12 weeks after injection. ADA titers were summarized for 3 categories: Low (titer \<1,000); Moderate (1,000 ≤ titer ≤ 10,000); High (titer \>10,000). ADA in serum were only measured in the Aflibercept 0.4 mg treatment arm.

Time frame: Baseline (treatment) and 12 weeks after aflibercept injection

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)BaselineADA positive response0 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)BaselineADA negative response75 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Week 12ADA positive response1 Participants
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Week 12ADA negative response74 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potential Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)

NAb status was evaluated for the samples that were positive in the ADA assay and had sufficient volume to analyze. NAb were only measured in participants with positive ADA in the Aflibercept 0.4 mg treatment arm

Time frame: At 12 weeks after aflibercept injection

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgNumber of Participants With Potential Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Ocular Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Ocular SAEs in treated eyes only were reported.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgPercentage of Participants With Ocular Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)13.3 Percentage of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Participants With Ocular Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)7.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that was observed or reported after the first and not later than 30 days after the last administration of study treatment. Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Ocular TEAEs in treated eyes only were reported

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgPercentage of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)38.7 Percentage of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)36.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Systemic SAEs

Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Systemic SAEs only were reported.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgPercentage of Participants With Systemic SAEs24.0 Percentage of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Participants With Systemic SAEs36.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Systemic TEAEs

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that was observed or reported after the first and not later than 30 days after the last administration of study treatment. Participants treated after week 21 were followed-up for adverse events up to week 28. Systemic TEAEs only were reported.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgPercentage of Participants With Systemic TEAEs52.0 Percentage of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationPercentage of Participants With Systemic TEAEs63.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Requiring Intervention With a Second Treatment Modality

A second treatment modality for ROP was either rescue treatment or any other surgical or nonsurgical treatment for ROP (e.g. IVT anti-VEGF injection, ablative laser therapy, cryotherapy, or vitrectomy) captured as concomitant medication or surgery after study start.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgProportion of Participants Requiring Intervention With a Second Treatment Modality0.072 Proportion of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationProportion of Participants Requiring Intervention With a Second Treatment Modality0.096 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Bayesian analysis with non-informative prior distributions. Calculation of two-sided 90% credible interval for the treatment difference (aflibercept - laser photocoagulation).90% CI: [-0.11, 0.046]
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Recurrence of ROP

Participants with recurrence of ROP were defined as subjects requiring re-treatment or rescue treatment after in the past the absence of treatment-requiring active ROP had been confirmed by the investigator.

Time frame: From baseline (treatment) up to week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aflibercept 0.4 mgProportion of Participants With Recurrence of ROP0.161 Proportion of participants
Laser PhotocoagulationProportion of Participants With Recurrence of ROP0.063 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Bayesian analysis with non-informative prior distributions. Calculation of two-sided 90% credible interval for the treatment difference (aflibercept - laser photocoagulation).90% CI: [0.019, 0.175]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026