Skip to content

Vital Sign Comparison Between Lifelight and Standard of Care - Development

Vital Sign Comparison Between Lifelight and Standard of Care - Development

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04003662
Acronym
VISION-D
Enrollment
9000
Registered
2019-07-01
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2021-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vital Signs

Brief summary

Patients and volunteers both with and without medical problems will be recruited; vital sign measurements are taken twice with normal equipment and while recording video data at the same time. The data collected will allow the Artificial Intelligence to develop the LifeLight algorithm to to improve measurement accuracy of its video data based vital signs monitor.

Detailed description

Vital signs such as heart rate, blood pressure, breathing rate and oxygen levels currently need several pieces of equipment and trained staff in order to be measured properly. The LifeLight app measures the same vital signs using a camera in a phone, tablet, laptop or smart TV. By using very small changes in the colour of your skin, LifeLight's AI system can calculate these values without any extra equipment or training, and without contact. The aim of this research study is to improve the accuracy of the LifeLight system with a view to a subsequent Validation study to prove the level of accuracy. The investigators will recruit patients, staff and visitors, both with and without medical problems, and take vital sign measurements twice with normal equipment and while recording video data at the same time. This will allow the AI which develops the LifeLight algorithm to make it more accurate, prior to a subsequent study which will validate the results.

Interventions

DEVICEVital Signs Measurement

Vital signs are measured twice with standard of care equipment while recording digital video data at the same time.

Sponsors

Xim Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* I1. Sufficiently conversant in the English language to satisfy I3. * I2. Able and willing to comply with all study requirements. * I3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate (including by parent or legal guardian if under 16 years old).

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood Pressure ReadingsSingle Visit; up to one dayComparison of digital video data to standard of care measurement
Oxygen Saturation ReadingsSingle Visit; up to one dayComparison of digital video data to standard of care measurement
Heart Rate (pulse) ReadingsSingle Visit; up to one dayComparison of digital video data to standard of care measurement
Respiratory RateSingle Visit; up to one dayComparison of digital video data to standard of care measurement

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026