ADHD
Conditions
Keywords
ADHD, Working memory, functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Neurofeedback, Cognitive training, Neuromonitoring
Brief summary
The proposed study is to test and validate a novel intervention that integrates computerized cognitive training with real-time neuromonitoring and neurofeedback to enhance working memory by probing the individualized neural systems underlying working memory. We will test the proposed intervention on children with ADHD with working memory deficits. The R61 proof-of-concept phase will assess the target engagement, effective dose and feasibility.
Interventions
The Neurofeedback group will receive the proposed intervention which integrates computerized working memory training with neuromonitoring and neurofeedback.
The Cognitive training group will receive computerized working memory training with performance feedback.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
include: * Age from 7 to 11 years * Diagnosis and/or current symptoms of ADHD * Full-scale Intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥80 * Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF), Working Memory Scale t-score \> 65 * Allowed comorbidities include oppositional defiant disorder, learning disabilities excluding dyslexia, and mild anxiety and/or depression.
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of severe neurological or psychiatric disease other than those allowed under inclusion * Sensory deficits that would preclude participation in assessments or imaging * History of significant head trauma with loss of consciousness * Contraindications to MRI (e.g. metal implants or claustrophobia) * Enrollment in other intervention studies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Working Memory Performance | baseline and 6 weeks | Accuracy in an N-back working memory task was calculated as the percentage of correct responses to target stimuli. |
| Change in Target Frontal-parietal Activity | baseline and 6 weeks | Change in activity in the target frontal-parietal network measured by functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during an N-back working memory task. A general linear model is applied to recorded signal and the beta coefficients from the model are extracted as a proxy for brain activity in fronto-pariteal network which subserves working memory function. There is no established population mean for beta coefficient of brain activity. Higher (lower) beta coefficients reflect higher (lower) activation in the target brain network. A positive change indicates increased brain activity. Increased frontal-parietal activity reflects better engagement of this brain network during working memory performance. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML-2), General Memory Index Score | baseline and 6 weeks | WRAML-2 assesses clinical issues in learning and memory functions. WRAML-2 Working Memory Index score ranges from 50 to 150 with higher scores indicating better working memory performance |
| Change in Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index Score | baseline and 6 weeks | Conners 3 will be used to measure changes in clinical ADHD symptoms. Conners 3 ADHD index score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating elevated ADHD symptoms. Conners 3 ADHD index score of higher than 65 is indicative of ADHD diagnosis. |
| Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Working Memory T-score | baseline and 6 weeks | BRIEF assesses everyday behavior associated with specific domains of the executive functions. BRIEF working memory T-score ranges from \<30 to \>100 with higher scores indicating larger impairment in working memory. Lower T-scores on BRIEF indicates better working memory. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. BRIEF working memory T-score of 65 and higher is indicative of deficits in working memory. |
| Change in Conners 3rd Edition Inattention T-score | baseline and 6 weeks | Conners 3 will be used to measure changes in clinical inattention symptoms. Conners 3 inattention t-score ranges from \<30 to \>100 with higher scores indicating larger impairment in attention. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Inattention t-score of 65 and higher is indicative of deficits in attention. |
| Change in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment II (NEPSY-II) Composite Score | baseline and 6 weeks | NEPSY-II consists of a set of subtests measuring cognitive functions required for success in school. The subtests include auditory attention & response, inhibition, word-list interference, and comprehension of instructions. The composite scores were quantified by averaging the scores across sub-scales. A positive change in composite score suggests increased ability in subtest domains. The composite score below 8 suggest deficits. The composite scores range from 0 to 20; lower scores correspond to more deficits, and higher scores correspond to more abilities. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in California Verbal Learning Test - Children's Version (CVLT-C) Score | baseline and 6 weeks | CVLT-C test measures performance in learning and recalling verbal materials |
| Change in Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Accuracy | baseline and 6 weeks | CPT is standard test for measuring vigilance, sustained attention and inhibitory control. |
| Change in Parent Stress Index 4th Edition (PSI-IV) | baseline and 6 weeks | PSI-IV evaluates the magnitude of stress in the parent-child system |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) The Neurofeedback group will receive 12 sessions of computerized cognitive intervention combined with neurofeedback in the lab. | 21 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) Both Neurofeedback and Cognitive Training groups will be assigned to waitlist before starting the corresponding intervention. | 15 |
| Total | 36 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Waitlist (Phase I) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 21 Participants | 15 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 9 Participants | 3 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 21 Participants | 15 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | 7 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12 Participants | 8 Participants | 20 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 33 | 0 / 32 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 33 | 0 / 32 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 33 | 0 / 32 |
Outcome results
Change in Target Frontal-parietal Activity
Change in activity in the target frontal-parietal network measured by functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during an N-back working memory task. A general linear model is applied to recorded signal and the beta coefficients from the model are extracted as a proxy for brain activity in fronto-pariteal network which subserves working memory function. There is no established population mean for beta coefficient of brain activity. Higher (lower) beta coefficients reflect higher (lower) activation in the target brain network. A positive change indicates increased brain activity. Increased frontal-parietal activity reflects better engagement of this brain network during working memory performance.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: Participants with usable data are included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Target Frontal-parietal Activity | 2.31 beta coefficient | Standard Deviation 1.73 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Target Frontal-parietal Activity | -4.74 beta coefficient | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
Change in Working Memory Performance
Accuracy in an N-back working memory task was calculated as the percentage of correct responses to target stimuli.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: Participants with usable data are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Working Memory Performance | 2.12 percent change in accuracy | Standard Deviation 15.7 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Working Memory Performance | -0.53 percent change in accuracy | Standard Deviation 12.09 |
Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Working Memory T-score
BRIEF assesses everyday behavior associated with specific domains of the executive functions. BRIEF working memory T-score ranges from \<30 to \>100 with higher scores indicating larger impairment in working memory. Lower T-scores on BRIEF indicates better working memory. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. BRIEF working memory T-score of 65 and higher is indicative of deficits in working memory.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: Participants with usable data are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Working Memory T-score | -8.4 t-score | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Working Memory T-score | -0.85 t-score | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
Change in Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index Score
Conners 3 will be used to measure changes in clinical ADHD symptoms. Conners 3 ADHD index score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating elevated ADHD symptoms. Conners 3 ADHD index score of higher than 65 is indicative of ADHD diagnosis.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: Participants with usable data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index Score | -6.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.61 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Conners 3rd Edition ADHD Index Score | -1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.49 |
Change in Conners 3rd Edition Inattention T-score
Conners 3 will be used to measure changes in clinical inattention symptoms. Conners 3 inattention t-score ranges from \<30 to \>100 with higher scores indicating larger impairment in attention. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Inattention t-score of 65 and higher is indicative of deficits in attention.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: Participants with usable data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Conners 3rd Edition Inattention T-score | -4.8 t-score | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Conners 3rd Edition Inattention T-score | 0.41 t-score | Standard Deviation 6.38 |
Change in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment II (NEPSY-II) Composite Score
NEPSY-II consists of a set of subtests measuring cognitive functions required for success in school. The subtests include auditory attention & response, inhibition, word-list interference, and comprehension of instructions. The composite scores were quantified by averaging the scores across sub-scales. A positive change in composite score suggests increased ability in subtest domains. The composite score below 8 suggest deficits. The composite scores range from 0 to 20; lower scores correspond to more deficits, and higher scores correspond to more abilities.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: participants with usable data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment II (NEPSY-II) Composite Score | 0.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment II (NEPSY-II) Composite Score | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
Change in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML-2), General Memory Index Score
WRAML-2 assesses clinical issues in learning and memory functions. WRAML-2 Working Memory Index score ranges from 50 to 150 with higher scores indicating better working memory performance
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Population: Participants with usable data were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurofeedback (Phase I) | Change in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML-2), General Memory Index Score | 6.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.36 |
| Waitlist (Phase I) | Change in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML-2), General Memory Index Score | 9.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.21 |
Change in California Verbal Learning Test - Children's Version (CVLT-C) Score
CVLT-C test measures performance in learning and recalling verbal materials
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Accuracy
CPT is standard test for measuring vigilance, sustained attention and inhibitory control.
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Parent Stress Index 4th Edition (PSI-IV)
PSI-IV evaluates the magnitude of stress in the parent-child system
Time frame: baseline and 6 weeks