Skip to content

Evaluation of the Decision-making During Multidisciplinary Meetings for Digestive Cancers

Prospective Evaluation of the Decision-making During Multidisciplinary Meetings for Digestive Cancers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04000802
Enrollment
200
Registered
2019-06-27
Start date
2019-05-23
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2019-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Decision Making, Neoplasms/Therapy, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care

Brief summary

Nowadays, the recommended approach for decision-making for oncology patients is based on multidisciplinary meetings (MDT). However, the quality of decision-making during MDT depends on other factors such as the quality of presentation of clinical cases, the degree of participation of different specialists. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the decision-making during digestive oncology MDT using the validated Metric Of Decision-Making tool (MDT-MODe), in the national institute of oncology (Rabat, Morocco).

Detailed description

Multidisciplinary cancer meetings are a multidisciplinary discussion and decision-making process for a patient with cancer. It allows a sharing of knowledge and decision-making, taking into account the opinion of all the specialists involved in the treatment of cancer, in order to propose the best possible decision for the patient. Nevertheless, the quality of decision-making during CPR depends on other factors such as the quality of presentation of clinical cases, the degree of participation of different specialists and the dynamics of meetings. There are several validated tools for the quantitative assessment of the decision-making mode during CPRs. The best known is the Metric Of Decision-Making (MDT-MODe). MDT-MODe is a validated tool for the observational evaluation of teamwork and the quality of decision-making during cancer CPR. MDT-MODe is designed to encourage teams to make holistic decisions tailored to each patient and allows an observer to assess, on a case-by-case basis, in a quantitative and objective way: The quality of the clinical information (antecedents, radiological pathologies, pathological, comorbid, psychosocial problems and patients' points of view) Contribution to decision-making in teams of key professional groups (surgeons, physicians, oncologists, nurses, health professionals, radiologists, pathologists) Taken together, these notes provide an indication of the quality of team decision-making. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the decision-making during digestive oncology MDT using the validated Metric Of Decision-Making tool (MDT-MODe), in the national institute of oncology (Rabat, Morocco).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALresponse to questionnary

No intervention. Observational study

Sponsors

Moroccan Society of Surgery
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All consecutive cases presented during multidisciplinary cancer meeting for digestive cancer.

Exclusion criteria

* Cases not registered in the electronic health record system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MODE-MDT scores60 days from the multidisciplinary team meetingThe scores of the Metric Of Decision-Making tool during multidisciplinary team meeting for digestive cancer. The instrument include 10 questions rated from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better results. The instrument include questions about the quality of clinical information (History, radiological, pathological, comorbid health conditions, psychosocial issues, and patients' views) and the contribution to team decision making of key professional groups (Surgeons, physicians, oncologists, nurses, allied healthcare professionals, radiologists, pathologists and MDT coordinators) ans a question about the decision (Clear, deferred, no decision. Each question is analyzed separately (mean, median, standard deviation, quartiles).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decision reached60 days from the multidisciplinary team meetingThe rate of cases with decisions during multidisciplinary team meetings (Clear decision about treatment in the MODE-MDT instrument).
Decision factors60 days from the multidisciplinary team meetingPredictive factors for reaching a clear decision about treatment during multidisciplinary team meetings. The factors analyzed are the question of the MODE-MDT instrument.

Countries

Morocco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026