Skip to content

The Comparison of Two Crosslinked Hyaluronate for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain

The Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between HYAJOINT Plus and Bioventus Durolane for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04000204
Enrollment
142
Registered
2019-06-27
Start date
2017-06-20
Completion date
2019-07-12
Last updated
2020-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, synovial fluid supplement, hyaluronic acid

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness between two BDDE-crosslinked hyaluronate, HYAJOINT Plus and Durolane, for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain.

Interventions

60 mg / 3 ml cross-linked hyaluronan, SciVision Biotech Inc.

DEVICEDurolane

60 mg / 3 ml cross-linked hyaluronan, Bioventus LLC.

Sponsors

SciVision Biotech Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age from 35 to 85 years; 2. radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade II to III; 3. symptoms ≧6 months despite conservative treatments such as analgesics, NSAID and/or physical therapy; 4. average knee pain score ≧30mm on 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) in recent one week; 5. radiographic evidence of bilateral knee OA not reason for exclusion if VAS pain in contralateral knee \<30mm.

Exclusion criteria

1. previous orthopedic surgery in the lower extremity; 2. disabling osteoarthritis of hip or ankle; 3. previous IAHA within 6 months; 4. IA steroid or joint puncture within 3 months; 5. characters of severe acute synovitis under ultrasound (US) examination, such as Grade 3 in suprapatellar synovitis (SPS), suprapatellar effusion (SPE), medial compartment synovitis (MCS) or lateral compartment synovitis (LCS); 6. Any specific medical condition, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Lupus erythematous, hemiparesis, infection, neoplasm, and etc., that would interfere with assessments; 7. confirmed or suspected pregnancy or lactating; 8. known allergy history to any avian protein or HA product.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change from baseline VAS pain score at 6 months post-injection.6 months post-injectionThe VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events reported from the baseline and during the study period1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Likert scale score changeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline WOMAC score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Total score is 96 and lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for stiffness changeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline VAS stiffness score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no stiffness' and '100' with 'worst stiffness'.
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain changeBaseline, 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline VAS pain score at 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'
Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) changeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline TUG time at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject to rise from an armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Single-leg stance test (SLS) changeBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline SLS time at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject raising one foot up without touching it to the supported lower extremity with knee OA and maintain balance for as long as possible.
Knee joint inflammatory state change by ultrasonic inspectionBaseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline of the subject knee inflammatory state at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection through ultrasonic inspection.
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for satisfaction change1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injectionThe change from baseline VAS satisfaction score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. Patients rate their treatment satisfaction based on a 100 mm VAS. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'least satisfaction' and '100' with 'highest satisfaction'.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026