Skip to content

Preoperative Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy Using Different Videolaryngoscopes

Awake Airway Assessment With Video Laryngoscopes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03999866
Enrollment
18
Registered
2019-06-27
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2019-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment, Difficult Airway Intubation, Preoperative

Keywords

airtraq, c-mac, d-blade, mcgarth mac x-blade, prediction, difficult airway

Brief summary

preoperative assessment of difficult airways are the subject of debate. Now, measuring the thyromental distance or evaluating the mallampati score, mandible protrusion or body mass index still not 100% specifically say anything. We compare 4 different video laryngoscopes for preoperative assessment of difficult laryngoscopy.

Detailed description

preoperative assessment of difficult airways are the subject of debate. Now, measuring the thyromental distance or evaluating the mallampati score, mandible protrusion or body mass index still not 100% specifically say anything. all patients were pre oxygenated with 100% oxygen with nasal canulla during the whole procedure. We administered 0.07 mgr/kg remifentanil for minimum 3 minutes and continue this infusion during the procedure. The patients airway topicalized by 10% lidocaine spray. We enroll 20 patients undergoing elective surgery. We compare 4 different video laryngoscopes for preoperative assessment of difficult laryngoscopy in the same patient. We evaluate the patient and the instructors satisfaction with the visual analogy scale and the visualization time. Demographic vary,ables and the airway characteristics of patients. We assess the cormack lehane view of these videolaryngoscopes with or without cricoid pressure. and the occurrence of gag reflex as well.

Interventions

DEVICEairtraq

airtraq videolaryngoscope

mcgarth mac videolaryngoscope

DEVICEstorz c-mac

storz c-mac videolaryngoscope

DEVICEstorz d-blade

storz d-blade video laryngoscope

Sponsors

Kocaeli University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

We used these 4 video laryngoscopes ( c-mac, d-blade, macgrath mac x-blade and airtraq) on the same patient.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- \> 18 years or \<60 years of age, * body mass index \< 30 * no difficult airway history or predictor, * no respiratory tract infections for ten days,

Exclusion criteria

BMI \> 35, \< 18 or \> 60 years of age, expected difficult airway, pregnant \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
satisfaction of the instructor: visual analogy scale2 minutesvisual analogy scale of the satisfaction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
satisfaction of the patient: visual analogy scale2 minutesvisual analogy scale of the satisfaction
duration view10 secondstime frame from the device enter the oral cavity till the vocal cords visualized

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026