Skip to content

Five-Plus Year Follow-Up of SMART Randomized Controlled Trial

Five-Plus Year Follow-Up of SMART (Surgical Multicenter Assessment of RF Ablation for the Treatment of Vertebrogenic Back Pain) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03997825
Acronym
SMART
Enrollment
117
Registered
2019-06-25
Start date
2019-06-13
Completion date
2019-11-08
Last updated
2021-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate long-term ongoing effectiveness of the Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Detailed description

This is a prospective multi-center, nonintervention, observational, single arm post market data collection of the 5+ year effectiveness and satisfaction outcome for the SMART trial population.

Interventions

DEVICEBasivertebral Nerve (BVN) Ablation

Single follow-up visit of previously treated participants from the SMART trial.

Sponsors

Relievant Medsystems, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* LBP at least 6 months from original SMART Trial * RF Ablation Arm from SMART Trial

Exclusion criteria

-Control Arm Subjects from SMART Trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LS Mean Reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) From BaselineDifference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurementsValidated questionnaire of low back pain related disability. Comprised of 10 questions evaluating the impact of low back pain on activities of daily living. The ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). Difference in mean ODI at baseline and 5 years post treatment measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LS Mean Reduction in VAS From BaselineDifference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurementsNumeric pain scale with minimum of 0 to maximum of 10; with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. Difference in mean VAS at baseline and at 5 years post treatment.
Responder RatesAt 5 year post treatmentProportion of participants that achieve a threshold of \> 15 point reduction in ODI and \> 2 point reduction in VAS calculated as the difference between the baseline measurements and the 5 year post treatment measurements.
Narcotics UseDifference between baseline and 5 years post treatment.Proportion of participants using a narcotic more than once per week in the 30 days prior to the study visit. Difference in baseline to 5 year post treatment percentage measurements.
InjectionsDifference from baseline percentage measurement to 5 years post treatment measurementProportion of participants receiving an injection for low back pain (adjudicated as same location and etiology as BVN ablation treatment) compared to baseline. Difference in percentage of participants at baseline and 5 years post treatment measurements.
InterventionsMeasured form treatment data to 5 years post treatment visit dateProportion of participants receiving a pain intervention or surgery for low back pain (adjudicated as the same location and etiology as BVN ablation treatment) from procedure date to 5 year visit date.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BVN Ablation Arm
Randomized and successfully treated with basivertebral nerve ablation
100
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyRefused participation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBVN Ablation Arm
Age, Continuous47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)42.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS)6.73 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
94 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

LS Mean Reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) From Baseline

Validated questionnaire of low back pain related disability. Comprised of 10 questions evaluating the impact of low back pain on activities of daily living. The ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). Difference in mean ODI at baseline and 5 years post treatment measurements.

Time frame: Difference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurements

Population: US per protocol BVN ablation treated participants who consented to participate

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BVN Ablation ArmLS Mean Reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) From Baseline25.95 units on a scale of 0 to 100 pointsStandard Deviation 18.54
p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Injections

Proportion of participants receiving an injection for low back pain (adjudicated as same location and etiology as BVN ablation treatment) compared to baseline. Difference in percentage of participants at baseline and 5 years post treatment measurements.

Time frame: Difference from baseline percentage measurement to 5 years post treatment measurement

Population: US per protocol BVN ablation treated participants that consented to participate

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BVN Ablation ArmInjections1 Participants
Secondary

Interventions

Proportion of participants receiving a pain intervention or surgery for low back pain (adjudicated as the same location and etiology as BVN ablation treatment) from procedure date to 5 year visit date.

Time frame: Measured form treatment data to 5 years post treatment visit date

Population: US per protocol BVN ablation treated participants that consented to participate

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BVN Ablation ArmInterventions11 Participants
Secondary

LS Mean Reduction in VAS From Baseline

Numeric pain scale with minimum of 0 to maximum of 10; with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. Difference in mean VAS at baseline and at 5 years post treatment.

Time frame: Difference between baseline and 5 year post treatment measurements

Population: US per protocol BVN ablation treated participants who consented to participate

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BVN Ablation ArmLS Mean Reduction in VAS From Baseline4.38 score on a scale of 0 to 10Standard Deviation 2.35
p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Narcotics Use

Proportion of participants using a narcotic more than once per week in the 30 days prior to the study visit. Difference in baseline to 5 year post treatment percentage measurements.

Time frame: Difference between baseline and 5 years post treatment.

Population: US per protocol BVN ablation treated participants that consented to participate

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BVN Ablation ArmNarcotics Use8 Participants
Secondary

Responder Rates

Proportion of participants that achieve a threshold of \> 15 point reduction in ODI and \> 2 point reduction in VAS calculated as the difference between the baseline measurements and the 5 year post treatment measurements.

Time frame: At 5 year post treatment

Population: US per protocol BVN ablation treated participants who consented to participate

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
BVN Ablation ArmResponder Rates75 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026