Skip to content

Ripple Mapping Guided Ablation of Ischaemic Ventricular Tachycardia.

Ripple Mapping Guided Ablation of Ischaemic Ventricular Tachycardia: A Multi-centre Prospective Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03997201
Acronym
RIPPLE-VT
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-06-25
Start date
2019-04-18
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease, Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

Ventricular, Tachycardia, Ischaemic, Mapping, Ablation

Brief summary

The Ripple VT-1 Study is a prospective clinical trial that aims to investigate if catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic heart disease can be effectively performed using Ripple Mapping.

Detailed description

Patients who have ischaemic heart disease and are at sufficient risk of, or have suffered, ventricular tachycardia may receive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) devices. ICD devices provide life-saving shocks to terminate ventricular tachycardia. There is however substantial evidence that correlates each life-saving shock with worsening prognosis. Catheter ablation is a procedure that can treat the cause of ischaemic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Most catheter ablation procedures for ischaemic VT are performed in normal rhythm, with an end-point of arrhythmic substrate modification. Arrhythmic substrate modification refers to the process by which abnormal electrical activity in cardiac scar tissue (from ischaemic heart disease) is identified and treated by ablation. Substrate modification catheter ablation procedures for ischaemic VT have been demonstrated to reduce ICD shocks and VT episodes in randomised trials compared to medications. However, ablation procedure outcomes are still imperfect with a recurrence rate of 50-60%. Ripple Mapping is a method of mapping the hearts electrical signals, that may allow better identification of the abnormal activity within scar and so improve recurrence rates following ablation. Patients referred for ablation of ischaemic VT, who have an ICD, will undergo their procedure with Ripple Mapping and subsequently followed up over a year, at 3 monthly intervals. The main assessed outcome will be ICD or VT events over a year. This will be compared to the number of ICD or VT events the year prior to ablation.

Interventions

PROCEDURERipple Mapping guided ischaemic VT ablation

Endocardial mapping of the ventricle performed with Ripple Mapping (CARTO3v6, Biosense Webster Inc). Ablation (SmarTouch Thermocool Catheter, Biosense Webster Inc) delivered to areas of abnormal late electrical activity within ventricular scar tissue.

Sponsors

Barts & The London NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital de Santa Maria, Portugal
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with coronary artery disease and ischaemic cardiomyopathy requiring ICD implantation for primary or secondary prevention. 2. Any episode of VT detected or treated appropriately (within monitor zone or therapy (ATP/shock) delivered) or by 12 lead ECG if the rate below the detection level of the device. An episode of VT will be defined as lasting more than 30 secs or a regular high rate episode meeting VT criterion for \>50% of the time before the first therapy is delivered (i.e. VT degenerating into VF is acceptable under these circumstances). 3. Ablation or medical therapy would be considered reasonable option for ongoing management. 4. Males or females 18 - 80 years of age. 5. Suitable candidate for catheter ablation. 6. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication to catheter ablation. 2. VT due to reversible causes. 3. Severe valvular disease or ventricular thrombus. 4. Active gastrointestinal bleeding. 5. Serum Creatinine \>200μmol/L or on dialysis. 6. Active fever or infection. 7. Life expectancy shorter than the duration of the trial. 8. Allergy to contrast. 9. Intractable heart failure (NYHA Class IV). 10. Bleeding or clotting disorders or inability to receive heparin. 11. Malignancy needing surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. 12. Pregnancy or women of child-bearing potential not using a highly effective method of contraception. 13. Unable to attend follow-up visits or ICD clinics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined ICD Therapies and Mortality12 monthsICD therapy (ATP and shocks) for sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation as documented by the patients device. Device interrogations occur 3 monthly. Combined with Mortality (all-cause) by 1 year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total ICD therapy rate12 monthsTotal appropriate and inappropriate (defined as ICD therapies for reasons other than ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) ICD therapies (ATP and shocks).
Total VT Episodes12 monthsTotal VT Episodes, detected by the ICD device, occurring in the 12 months after ablation
Appropriate ATP therapy rate12 monthsTotal appropriate ICD ATP therapies during 12 month follow up after ablation
Achievement of the ablation procedure protocol end-pointProcedureAbolition of abnormal electrical activity within ischaemic ventricular scar by Ripple Mapping guided ablation
Repeat catheter ablation for ischaemic ventricular tachycardia12 monthsNeed for a repeat catheter ablation procedure after the study procedure and during the 12 month follow up period.
All cause mortality12 monthsAll cause mortality
Appropriate ICD Shocks rate12 monthsTotal ICD Shocks during 12 month follow up after ablation

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026