Skip to content

Resolving Psychological Stress

Resolving Psychological Stress (RePS): a Mobile Health Application for Modifying Attention Bias to Threat in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03996876
Acronym
RePS
Enrollment
28
Registered
2019-06-25
Start date
2018-01-09
Completion date
2019-08-16
Last updated
2021-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Use Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

Attention Bias Modification, PTSD, Digital Health, Alcohol Use Disorder

Brief summary

The investigators have developed a mobile app called Resolving Psychological Stress (REPS) to help alleviate symptoms of PTSD. The app will administer threat-related attention bias modification to individuals who have both a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V (DSM-V) diagnosis of PTSD (and meet at least one DSM-V criteria for threat sensitivity) and a DSM-V diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder. The aims of the study are to explore both the feasibility and acceptability of the app with it's users, and to explore the efficacy of the app at alleviating PTSD severity.

Detailed description

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly disabling disorder that affects approximately 30 million people in the United States. New low-cost and accessible treatments for PTSD are desperately needed. Threat-related attention biases represent an important potential treatment target for PTSD. Such attention biases predict risk for PTSD following trauma exposure, and are thought to maintain symptoms of PTSD and other anxiety disorders. Research indicates that specific forms of computerized attention bias modification (ABM) are effective in reducing attention bias for threat as well as anxiety in patients with diverse anxiety disorders. The investigators have developed a mobile app called RePS (Resolving Psychological Stress) to administer threat-related ABM to patients with PTSD and Alcohol Use Disorder and have tested it in a laboratory-based pilot study of 19 people with PTSD. Preliminary data indicate that the app is highly acceptable to patients and that use of the app reduces attention bias for threat and PTSD symptom severity. The study aims are to examine the feasibility, acceptability and usability of app-based ABM; and determine the efficacy of app-based ABM in reducing attention bias and PTSD severity.

Interventions

DEVICERePS (Resolving Psychological Stress) - Threat ABM Training

This mobile app will aim to reduce neurobiological threat sensitivity with the ultimate goal of developing novel treatments for PTSD. The app can be used on an iPhone Operating System (iOS) compatible phone and involves a training program that aims to directly reduce threat sensitivity by modifying attention. The contents of the app will be the same for each user.

DEVICERePS (Resolving Psychological Stress) - Neutral Attention Training

This app will be a placebo attention bias modification that will be used on an iOS compatible phone. The placebo will contain only neutral words.

Sponsors

San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be blind to the bias modification training they are assigned.

Intervention model description

Participants will be assigned to either a threat attention bias modification training or a neutral attention training.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Must have current PTSD symptoms. 2. Must drink alcohol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Very recent or current trauma or trauma exposure. 2. Recent moderate or severe non-alcohol substance use disorder. 3. Active suicidality. 4. Lifetime history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder I. 5. Medical conditions including seizure disorders, neurological disorders, moderate or severe head injury, systemic illness affecting nervous system function, heart defect, or medically unstable injuries. 6. Recent or planned change in psychotherapeutic treatment for PTSD or other psychiatric symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PTSD Symptoms Using PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline and 15 Days15 days apartThe PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL- 5) was administered via the mobile application to assess changes in PTSD symptoms. The PCL-5 is a well validated and widely used structured 20-item diagnostic interview for assessing symptomology of PTSD corresponding to a DSM-5 diagnosis. PCL scores range from 0-80, with a score of 33 or above indicating clinically significant PTSD symptoms. Participants were asked about the severity of symptoms over the past week.
Differences in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) During a Threat Sensitivity Computerized Task15 days apartParticipants will perform computerized tasks designed to assess threat sensitivity. The task contains three different threat conditions, regarding the possibility of receiving a small, electric shock via an electrode on the hand (shock level is set by the participant). The three conditions are: shock not possible, shock possible, and shock may be possible. HRV is measured during all conditions and differences between the three conditions are scored.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 Days15 daysA usability assessment questionnaire was administered with multiple feasibility and acceptability questions regarding the REPS Mobile Application (Ease of use, Convenience, Enjoyment, Comfort with the app and Overall satisfaction). The responses were measured on a Five-Point Scale with 1 meaning Not at all and 5 meaning Very much. Analyses included all participants that completed the usability assessment questionnaire.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Threat ABM Training
All participants used the same REPS app to complete their training. At the end of their training they answered general questions about the app that did not pertain to the specific type of training they received.
14
Neutral Attention Training
All participants used the same REPS app to complete their training. At the end of their training they answered general questions about the app that did not pertain to the specific type of training they received.
14
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIncomplete Data24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicThreat ABM TrainingNeutral Attention TrainingTotal
Age, Continuous44.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25
39.30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.57
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.57
PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) Score36.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.17
37.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.99
36.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.75
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/Black
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/European American
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latinx
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one ethnicity
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants14 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Differences in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) During a Threat Sensitivity Computerized Task

Participants will perform computerized tasks designed to assess threat sensitivity. The task contains three different threat conditions, regarding the possibility of receiving a small, electric shock via an electrode on the hand (shock level is set by the participant). The three conditions are: shock not possible, shock possible, and shock may be possible. HRV is measured during all conditions and differences between the three conditions are scored.

Time frame: 15 days apart

Population: Due to technical difficulties, we were unable to calculate heart rate variability for the participants in this study. Thus, HRV data was not collected in this study.

Primary

PTSD Symptoms Using PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline and 15 Days

The PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL- 5) was administered via the mobile application to assess changes in PTSD symptoms. The PCL-5 is a well validated and widely used structured 20-item diagnostic interview for assessing symptomology of PTSD corresponding to a DSM-5 diagnosis. PCL scores range from 0-80, with a score of 33 or above indicating clinically significant PTSD symptoms. Participants were asked about the severity of symptoms over the past week.

Time frame: 15 days apart

Population: All participants used in analyses completed at least 16/20 items of the PCL-5 (total 20 items) on both Day 1 (Pre) and Day 15 (Post).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Threat ABM TrainingPTSD Symptoms Using PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline and 15 DaysPre PCL Score33.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Threat ABM TrainingPTSD Symptoms Using PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline and 15 DaysPost PCL Score31.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Neutral Attention TrainingPTSD Symptoms Using PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline and 15 DaysPre PCL Score36.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Neutral Attention TrainingPTSD Symptoms Using PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) at Baseline and 15 DaysPost PCL Score28.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
p-value: 0.322ANOVA
Secondary

Rating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 Days

A usability assessment questionnaire was administered with multiple feasibility and acceptability questions regarding the REPS Mobile Application (Ease of use, Convenience, Enjoyment, Comfort with the app and Overall satisfaction). The responses were measured on a Five-Point Scale with 1 meaning Not at all and 5 meaning Very much. Analyses included all participants that completed the usability assessment questionnaire.

Time frame: 15 days

Population: Analyses included all participants that completed the usability assessment questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Threat ABM TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysConvenience4.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Threat ABM TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysComfort with the app4.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Threat ABM TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysEnjoyable3.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Threat ABM TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysOverall satisfaction4.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Threat ABM TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysEase of use4.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Neutral Attention TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysOverall satisfaction4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Neutral Attention TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysEase of use4.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Neutral Attention TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysConvenience3.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Neutral Attention TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysEnjoyable3.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Neutral Attention TrainingRating of the Resolving Psychological Stress (Reps) Mobile Application on a Five-Point Scale for Multiple Feasibility and Acceptability Items After the Intervention, at 15 DaysComfort with the app4.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026