Low Back Pain, Mechanical
Conditions
Keywords
Battlefield Acupuncture, Auricular Acupuncture, Complementary Alternative Medicine, Military, Service Members, Emergency Medicine, Back Pain, Acute Back Pain, Chronic Back Pain, Alternative Medicine,
Brief summary
The randomized controlled study aims was to investigate the pain control of Battle Field Acupuncture as Primary or Adjunctive Treatment in Back Pain (Acute Musculoskeletal pain) in the (acute pain setting) Emergency Department vs stand of care pain medications.
Detailed description
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of Battlefield Acupuncture versus standard care (medicinal therapy) in an Emergency Room setting for acute/subacute back pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to determine changes in pain levels. Secondary outcomes will include performance using the back pain functional scale (BPFS), satisfaction of treatment, and the need for further pain medication after discharge from the emergency department. Design and Methods: A prospective, randomized control trial, (un-blinded, non-placebo controlled) with convenience sampling based on scheduled clinical shifts in the Emergency Department. The population consisted of active duty service members and Department of Defense beneficiaries (dependents and retirees) at the DoD's sole Level I trauma center, San Antonio Military Medical Center Emergency Department with acute/subacute, or acute/subacute on chronic back pain as the chief complaint. The participants studied age range was from 18-55 years old without concern for pathological back pain. Subjects were selected based on their chief complaint identified by the triage nurse. A randomized convenience sampling method was used while members of the research team were on shift. Subjects were informed of the study once they were triaged at the Emergency Department treatment area. Members were screened for pathological back pain by history and physical, and if negative were offered enrollment into the study. After informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), demographics were collected as well as an initial Visual Analog Score (VAS) score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, and back pain functional scale (BPFS). Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group based on a random number generator. Subjects then received either BFA or the standard care, which was a pre-determined medicinal treatment. Participants were reassessed at 30-40 minutes post intervention for effectiveness of intervention for both pain and satisfaction. After initial pain control was achieved subjects completed a questionnaire on their perceived effectiveness of BFA as well as if they would repeat BFA in the future. If participants did not feel pain was adequately controlled in the either treatment arm they were provided rescue pain medications based on the preference of the treating provider. At discharge, participants were given further instructions including a follow-up telephone interview between 48-72 hours. In the telephone follow-up, participants were assessed on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), repeat functionality questionnaire, and if they used any other pain medications since discharge to help improve their pain (either pain medications given at discharge from the emergency department or their regularly prescribed pain medications). Data Analysis: In this study, the independent variables were treatment for musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department (standard care, battlefield acupuncture) and time (before treatment, 30 to 40 minutes post-treatment and 48 to 72 hours post-treatment). The dependent variable is pain measured on a VAS or NRS at 48-72 hours post-treatment. The null hypothesis is that there is no statistically significant difference in pain related to treatment or time between treatment groups. With 26 subjects per group (52 total), the investigator was able to detect a 1.0 standard deviation (SD) difference measured by a 13mm change in the VAS or a 2 point change in the NRS.
Interventions
DEVICEBattlefield Acupuncture
1-10 needles inserted in systematic nature as described by Battlefield acupuncture protocol.
DRUGAcetaminophen
Acetaminophen 500mg-1000mg,
DRUGDiclofenac
Diclofenac 50mg-75 mg orally
DRUGDiazepam
Diazepam 5mg-10 mg intravenous or oral
DRUGHydrocodone
Hydrocodone 5mg/325mg-10mg/650mg mg
DRUGKetorolac
oral, or intramuscular Ketorolac 30mg-60 mg
Sponsors
San Antonio Military Medical Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Individuals to be enrolled the study will be: * Emergency Room patient * Able to provide informed consent (of sound mind) * acute defined as less than 3 months, or acute on chronic musculoskeletal pain * Individuals will be between 18-55 years of age and include Active Duty (AD) service members and beneficiaries * Pain at prescreening will be greater than or equal to 3 based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). * Non-pathological acute back pain
Exclusion criteria
* The individuals eligible for the study will be in good health, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2006). Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity (WHO, 2006). Specific
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| time-response of BFA, and the association with pain level using the Visual Analog scale (0-10 mm) scoring as well as the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) scoring | before treatment, 30-40 minutes post-treatment, and 48 to 72 hours post-treatment | determine if there is any significant change in pain in the BFA treatment group at specific time points using the Visual Analog scale (0-10 mm) scoring as well as the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) scoring |
| Evaluate the change of pain on Visual Analog scale (0-10mm) scoring with BFA administered in the emergency department for persons presenting with non-pathologic back pain. | baseline and at 30-40 minutes post treatment | Using the Visual Analog scale which is a 10mm line, the patient will place a mark on the graph which will be measured to determine if there is any significant difference between the BFA treatment group pain at specific timepoints using the VAS. The lower the score determined on the scale corresponds to a lower pain level for the patient and a higher score corresponds to a higher pain level. |
| Evaluate the change of pain on Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) scoring with BFA administered in the emergency department for persons presenting with non-pathologic back pain. | baseline, 30-40 minutes, and 48-72 hours | The Numeric Rating scale which is a scale that is verbally asked to determine the patients pain response on a scale from 0 to 10 determine if there is any significant difference between the BFA treatment group pain at specific timepoints using the NRS. The lower the score determined on the scale corresponds to a lower pain level for the patient and a higher score corresponds to a higher pain level. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| time-response | 30-40 minutes after treatment, and between 48-72 hours after discharge | Time response will determine change in pain associated with the Numeric Rating scale (measured 0-10, 0 being least, 10 being most) from baseline, at 30-40 minutes after treatment, and between 48-72 hours after discharge. |
| The need for any additional pain medication outside of the treatment protocol | recorded at the 48-72 hours from discharge for the follow up interview | Number of patients that required any additional pain medications either in the Emergency Room or at home to include over the counter or prescription |
| Examine the functionality score changes at 3 time points using the Back Pain Functional Scale | baseline, at the time the patient is to be discharged from the Emergency Room (0-3 hrs post baseline assessment), and 48-72 hours after discharge | Stratford et al developed the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) (scored 0-60 with higher scores showing no difficulty and lower scores showing patient is unable to perform activity) to evaluation functional ability in patients with back pain. The authors are from McMaster University Appalachian Physical Therapy (Georgia) and Virginia Commonwealth University. |
| Explore participant satisfaction of pain control in the BFA treatment group: 1 question | At discharge from the Emergency Room (0-3 hours post baseline assessment) and between 48-72 hours after discharge | 1 question regarding overall pain control satisfaction, and 2 specifically addressing those in the acupuncture group |
Outcome results
None listed