Skip to content

Comparison Thymoglobulin® and Grafalon®

Comparison Thymoglobulin® Versus Grafalon® in Renal Transplantation - Spiesser Group (Retro/Prospective Study) I

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03996278
Acronym
THYGRET
Enrollment
300
Registered
2019-06-24
Start date
2019-05-22
Completion date
2021-11-22
Last updated
2020-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Transplantation

Keywords

THYMOGLOBULINE®, GRAFALON®

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, observational, non -interventional study with comparison with an historical cohort Investigators will compare the efficacy and safety of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis) versus Grafalon (Neovii, previously ATG-Fresenius) in renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, delayed graft function, acute rejection, DSA occurrence and toxicities, various infections including CMV and BK virus incidence, MACE (major cardiac adverse event) and cancer. Investigators will also compare cumulative treatment and follow up costs and other key criteria available in the ASTRE database.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, observational, non -interventional study with comparison with an historical cohort Investigators will compare the efficacy and safety of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis) versus Grafalon (Neovii, previously ATG-Fresenius) in renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, delayed graft function, acute rejection, DSA occurrence and toxicities, various infections including CMV and BK virus incidence, MACE (major cardiac adverse event) and cancer. Investigators will also compare cumulative treatment and follow up costs and other key criteria available in the ASTRE database. Justification for a non-interventional study: in the study the medicinal products will be prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorisation. The assignment of the patient to the product is not decided in advance by a trial protocol but falls within current practice of the centre and the prescription of the medicine is clearly separated from the decision to include the patient in the study. No additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures are applied to the patients and epidemiological methods are used for the analysis of collected data.

Interventions

None interventional study but there are two groups

Sponsors

University Hospital, Brest
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* For the Grafalon prospective group: all first 11-12 patients from the 13 transplant centres receiving Grafalon according to the local practice * For the Thymoglobulin group: a group of 130 patients matched for: age (donor and recipient) gender indication (immunological indication versus DFG) CMV status

Exclusion criteria

* Patient younger than 18 years old * Living donor * Donor after cardiac death (because the Maastricht 3 donors are authorized recently in France)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison adverse events of the 2 ATGs and data collected thanks to the ASTRE databaseDuring one yearAll events: Death, graft loss, acute rejection, DGF, de novo DSA Severe infection (SAE), hematological adverse event (SAE), CMV infection, BK virus infection, MACE(major cardiac adverse event) and cancer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recipient Efficacy (any adverse events)During one yearcomparison during the first year between the two groups for: patient and graft survival, delayed graft function, one year rate of acute rejection, occurrence od de novo DSA, renal function at one year (eGFR,MDRD)
Recipient Safety (any adverse events)During one yearComparison during the first year between the two groups for various infections (virus, bacteria, fungi), hematological adverse event (SAE or not)
Reconstitution of the T, and B cell populationsDuring one yearReconstitution of the T, and B cell populations at D0, D7, M3, M12
Cost comparisonDuring one yearHospitals costs at 1 year months (including re-hospitalisation costs)

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactYannick LE MEUR
yannick.lemeur@chu-brest.fr298-347-074
Backup ContactChristelle RATAJCZAK
christelle.ratajczak@chu-brest.fr298-347-061

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026