Skip to content

Time to Post-Anesthesia Neurological Evaluation With Three Different Anesthetic Techniques

Time to Post-Anesthesia Neurological Evaluation and Hemodynamic Stability in Carotid Endarterectomy Comparing Three General Anesthetic Techniques Targeted to a Preset Bispectral Index Value: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03996148
Enrollment
21
Registered
2019-06-24
Start date
2017-09-29
Completion date
2018-09-19
Last updated
2022-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Stenosis

Brief summary

The objective of this pilot study is to analyze the differences in time to first postoperative neurological examination (cranial nerve XII - tongue movement, movement of extremities) and intraoperative hemodynamic stability with three different general anesthetic techniques that are used for carotid endarterectomy. Carotid endarterectomy surgery removes the plaque and stenosis but has a 1-3% risk of periprocedural stroke or death. The ability to detect neurological abnormalities early after surgery is vital in this patient population to facilitate timely additional diagnostics or interventions if a potential stroke is detected. Anesthetic techniques that facilitate an earlier reliable neurological exam will thus greatly benefit this surgical patient population. The primary objective of this pilot study is to determine the time difference from end of surgery to first neurologic exam between three commonly used anesthetic methods for carotid endareterectomy.

Detailed description

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the incidence of stroke in people with symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are risks associated with this procedure such as stroke from carotid clamping with poor collateral brain circulation or embolization of carotid plaque debris (Sheth, 2017). Few surgeons monitor the brain during the procedure using SSEP or EEG, as most rely on intraoperative blood pressure management, shunting, and postoperative neurological exam (De Santis, 2016; Kobayashi, 2011). A Cochrane review of regional versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy reveals no significant difference in outcomes (Vaniyaping, 2013). It is common practice at Cooper Hospital to deliver general anesthesia. The general anesthetic given may affect the length of time to first post-operative neurological response and the hemodynamic stability, though this is not well studied. A search in PubMed in April 2017 for carotid endarterectomy AND (general anesthesia OR total intravenous anesthesia OR regional anesthesia) AND neurologic exam (endarterectomy, carotid\[MeSH Terms\] OR (endarterectomy\[All Fields\] AND carotid\[All Fields\]) OR carotid endarterectomy\[All Fields\] OR (carotid\[All Fields\] AND endarterectomy\[All Fields\])) AND ((general anaesthesia\[All Fields\] OR anesthesia, general\[MeSH Terms\] OR (anesthesia\[All Fields\] AND general\[All Fields\]) OR general anesthesia\[All Fields\] OR (general\[All Fields\] AND anesthesia\[All Fields\])) OR (total\[All Fields\] AND (intravenous anaesthesia\[All Fields\] OR anesthesia, intravenous\[MeSH Terms\] OR (anesthesia\[All Fields\] AND intravenous\[All Fields\]) OR intravenous anesthesia\[All Fields\] OR (intravenous\[All Fields\] AND anesthesia\[All Fields\]))) OR (regional anaesthesia\[All Fields\] OR anesthesia, conduction\[MeSH Terms\] OR (anesthesia\[All Fields\] AND conduction\[All Fields\]) OR conduction anesthesia\[All Fields\] OR (regional\[All Fields\] AND anesthesia\[All Fields\]) OR regional anesthesia\[All Fields\])) AND (neurologic\[All Fields\] AND exam\[All Fields\]) revealed no studies comparing anesthetic types and time to first post-operative neurological response in this surgical population. Through anecdotal experience at Cooper Hospital, patients are noted to emerge faster and follow commands sooner when not given preoperative midazolam and given a combined Total Intravenous Anesthetic (TIVA) and volatile inhalational anesthetic technique titrated to a bispectral index (BIS) of 50-60. Ruling out anesthetic causes of abnormal neurological function is vital in this patient population. Neurological dysfunction that is surgical in nature may require early intervention such as surgical reexploration or CT scan. Time is brain, and a few minutes difference is enough to cause permanent neurological damage if a progressing stroke is not quickly identified. Anesthetic techniques that demonstrate a quicker return to baseline neurological function will greatly benefit this surgical patient population.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil, Propofol, and Desflurane

Remifentanil - titratable; initial starting dose 0.05 mcg/kg/min Propofol - titratable; initial starting dose 75 mcg/kg/min Desflurane 0.5 MAC

DRUGRemifentanil, Dexmedetomidine, and Desflurane

Remifentanil - titratable; initial starting dose 0.05 mcg/kg/min Dexmedetomidine - titratable; initial starting dose 0.5 mcg/kg/hr Desflurane 0.5 MAC

Remifentanil - titratable; initial starting dose 0.05 mcg/kg/min Desflurane - titratable

Sponsors

The Cooper Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years of age and older 2. Having carotid endarterectomy surgery 3. Able to undergo a preoperative neurological exam

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant patients 2. Prisoners 3. Patients with dementia or reduced mental status acute or chronic 4. Known brain tumor or head trauma 5. Known severe, uncorrected coronary artery disease (CAD) 6. Ejection fraction (EF) less than 15% 7. Patients with intraaortic ballon pump (IABP) or other mechanical circulatory assist device 8. Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 9. Combined surgical procedures (CABG and CAD) 10. Patients with uncontrolled or severe anxiety requiring benzodiazepine administration 11. Patients with history of difficult airway 12. Sedation other than propofol, dexmedetomidine or volatile anesthetic agent (VAA) is needed for patient (i.e. ketamine in patients with history of neuropathic pain) 13. Intubated or unconscious patients 14. Patients on methadone or fentanyl patch 15. Patients with known unusual or extreme anesthetic requirements 16. Patients who would require an unusual amount of narcotic to control pain 17. Patients having endarterectomy wherein surgeon requests local-regional anesthesia only 18. Patients with known history of prolonged emergence from anesthesia 19. Morbidly obese patients (BMI \>40) 20. Patients with scalp or forehead defects that prohibit application of BIS monitor strip

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Neurological Examup to 1 hour after emergence from general anesthesia.Time to first neurological exam after emergence from general anesthesia

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Remifentanil, Propofol, and Desflurane
Study group A: no midazolam given; maintenance drugs started immediately after induction and airway is secured. Remifentanil, Propofol, and Desflurane: Remifentanil - titratable; initial starting dose 0.05 mcg/kg/min Propofol - titratable; initial starting dose 75 mcg/kg/min Desflurane 0.5 MAC
7
Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine, and Desflurane
Study group B: no midazolam given; maintenance drugs started immediately after induction and airway is secured. Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine, and Desflurane: Remifentanil - titratable; initial starting dose 0.05 mcg/kg/min Dexmedetomidine - titratable; initial starting dose 0.5 mcg/kg/hr Desflurane 0.5 MAC
6
Remifentanil and Desflurane
Study group C (control group): no midazolam given; maintenance drugs started immediately after induction and airway is secured. Remifentanil and Desflurane: Remifentanil - titratable; initial starting dose 0.05 mcg/kg/min Desflurane - titratable
7
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRemifentanil, Propofol, and DesfluraneRemifentanil, Dexmedetomidine, and DesfluraneRemifentanil and DesfluraneTotal
Age, Continuous70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Confusion Assessment Method (3D CAM)0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Preoperative Short Blessed Test4 units on a scale0 units on a scale5 units on a scale4 units on a scale
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants6 participants7 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants6 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 70 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 70 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 71 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Time to First Neurological Exam

Time to first neurological exam after emergence from general anesthesia

Time frame: up to 1 hour after emergence from general anesthesia.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Remifentanil, Propofol, and DesfluraneTime to First Neurological Exam9 MinutesStandard Deviation 4
Remifentanil, Dexmedetomidine, and DesfluraneTime to First Neurological Exam7 MinutesStandard Deviation 4
Remifentanil and DesfluraneTime to First Neurological Exam7 MinutesStandard Deviation 3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026