Skip to content

Using Decision Aids to Reducing Decision Conflict in Angiography Patients for Choosing Hemostasis

Using Decision Aids to Reducing Decision Conflict in Angiography Patients for Choosing Hemostasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03995381
Acronym
N201902036
Enrollment
150
Registered
2019-06-24
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2019-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Haemostatic Adverse Reaction

Keywords

Haemostasis

Brief summary

Vascular closure device, hemostatic bandage and manual compression can achieve hemostasis after angiographic examination. These three methods of hemostasis changed the rate of hemostasis, early ambulation, hematoma , hemostasis failure rate, and expense. Therefore, shared decision making (SDM) is necessary to aid patients to choose hemostasis.The investigators have developed a decision aids (DA) and planned a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate its impact on angiographic patients. The measurements include a battery of interview-based questionnaires and evaluations of decision conflicts. The investigators expect the DAs would benefit the intervention group in the aspects of knowledge, communication and choice conflicts.during and after thier Hemostasis procedure.

Interventions

Shared decision making with decision aids

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who needs an angiographic examination or treatment. * Patients with angiographic indications * Patients who were able to give consent and complete the interview

Exclusion criteria

* The angiographic procedure uses patients with a catheter size more than 7fr. * Patients in critical situations requiring urgent treatment * Patients had cognitive impairment * Patients were physically unfit to be interviewed * Patients were non-Mandarin or -Taiwanese

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decisional conflict1 hour before AngiographyTotal score of decisional conflict scale

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYi-Chun Huang
12020@s.tmu.edu.tw886-2-88490088

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026