Skip to content

Dutch Version Fear-Avoidance Component Scale (FACS)

Validation and Reliability of the Dutch Version of the Fear-Avoidance Component Scale (FACS)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03994861
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-06-21
Start date
2019-08-01
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2023-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fear of Injury, Fear of Pain, Hip Pain Chronic, Knee Pain Chronic, Low Back Pain, Recurrent, Musculoskeletal Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain Disorder, Neck Pain, PROMs, Shoulder Pain

Brief summary

Chronic musculoskeletal disorders such as low back and neck pain are responsible for an enormous global burden. Fear-avoidance (FA) can be a predictor for the transition from subacute to chronic low back pain. In patients with neck pain, those who were less fearful about harming their neck, had higher pain tolerance, which might have a positive impact on their level of disability. A new scale, the Fear-Avoidance Component Scale (FACS) was developed by Neblett, Mayer, Hartzell, Williams and Gatchel (2015) to assess FA. It consists of an all-encompassing set of constructs that more effectively deals with all critical issues of the FA concept than current scales do. Current scales have been criticized because of following findings: limited construct validity, little evidence on treatment responsiveness, a lack of evidence-based cut-off scores and items being too narrow or too general. The new scale comprehensively assesses all cognitive, emotional and behavioral components related to the updated version of the FA model by combining items of well-known scales in context of the FA model with items on one's perception of victimization and blame related to an injury. A Dutch version of the FACS is currently lacking. Subsequently, the aim of this study is to investigate different psychometric properties of the generated Dutch version in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAssessment of disability and behavior (by questionnaires)

Assessment of disability and behavior (by questionnaires)

Sponsors

Jessa Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hasselt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Patients with musculoskeletal disorders are compared to matched healthy controls.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for all patients * between 18-80 years old * current pain complaint is not surgically treated * not being currently treated by a physiotherapist for pain complaint * Dutch language is mother tongue * At least 6 weeks of pain

Exclusion criteria

for all patients * Pain from a non-musculoskeletal origin (e.g., tumour) * neurological disease * impaired cognition Inclusion criteria for healthy controls * Not being disabled due to MSK pain based on cut-off per disability questionnaire * Between 18-80 years old * Dutch language is mother tongue

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The fear-avoidance component scale (FACS)day 0Questionnaire evaluating fear-avoidance related to pain (for all participants) 20 items range from 0-100
Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) for shoulder pain patientsday 0Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with shoulder pain) 30 items Range total score 0-100 5 point-scale
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) for hip pain patientsday 0Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with hip pain) Subscores per domain 40 items 5 point scale 5 domains: symptoms (5 items), pain (10 items), activities of daily living (17 items), sport and leisure time (4 items), quality of life (4 items)
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for knee pain patientsday 0Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with knee pain) Subscores per domain 42 items 5 domains: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items), activities of daily life (17 items), sports and leisure (5 items), quality of life (4 items) 5 point Likert scale
Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back painday 0Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with low back pain) 10 items Total score range from 0-100
Neck Disability Index for neck pain patientsday 0Questionnaire evaluating disability (only used in patients with neck pain) 10 items Total score range from 0-100
Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaireday 03 subscales: physical activity (4 items; 0-30), work (7 items; 0-66) and rest (5 items)
Tampa scale for kinesiophobiaday 0Questionnaire evaluating kinesiophobia related to pain (for all participants) 17 items total score from 17-68
Pain catastrophizing scaleday 0Questionnaire evaluating catastrophizing (for all participants) 13 items 5 point Likert Scale Total score 0-52
IEQ-Dutch scale for perceived injusticeday 0Questionnaire evaluating perceived injustice (for all participants) 12 items 5 point Likert-scale Total score range 0-48
Hospital anxiety and depression scaleday 0Questionnaire evaluating anxiety and depression (for all participants) 2 subscales: anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items) Total score 0-21 per subscale

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026