Skip to content

Mechanism of Action of tACS for the Treatment of MDD

Mechanism of Action for Transcranial Alternating Current (tACS) Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03994081
Acronym
GLADIATOR2
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-06-21
Start date
2021-06-09
Completion date
2023-06-02
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder, MDD

Keywords

tACS, Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, mood symptoms, sham

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to use a specific type of non-invasive brain stimulation known as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to determine its effects on brain activity (measured with EEG) and mood in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Detailed description

The device used for non-invasive brain stimulation is investigational and has not been approved by the FDA, though it has been designated as a nonsignificant risk (NSR) device study by the FDA. Half of the participants will receive tACS and half will receive sham stimulation, an inactive control procedure for comparison use only. Participation in this study includes up to eight appointments, each one lasting from 30 minutes to four hours over the course of 3 weeks. The first two appointments will be remote interviews to determine eligibility. If the subjects qualify, the next five appointments will be scheduled as consecutive stimulation sessions in the Carolina Center for Neurostimulation at the Vilcom office. The follow-up appointment will be in our center two weeks after the completion of the stimulation sessions. We estimate the total time needed to complete study participation to be about 17 hours.

Interventions

DEVICEtACS

XCSITE100

DEVICESham tACS

XCSITE100

Sponsors

Foundation of Hope, North Carolina
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Using sham stimulation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18-70 years * DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD; unipolar, non-psychotic * Hamilton Rating Depression Rating Scale (HRDS-17) score \>8 * Low suicide risk as determined by a score of \<3 on the Suicide Item on the HDRS-17 and based on additional information from the C-SSRS (no intent) * Capacity to understand all relevant risks and potential benefits of the study (informed consent)

Exclusion criteria

* DSM-V diagnosis of moderate or severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) within the last 12 months. * DSM-V diagnosis of moderate to severe substance use disorder (excluding tobacco) within the last 12 months. * Current axis I mood, or psychotic disorder other than major depressive disorder * Lifetime comorbid psychiatric bipolar or psychotic disorder * Eating disorder (current or within the past 6 months) * Obsessive-compulsive disorder (lifetime) * Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, current or within the last 6 months) * Change of ADHD medication within the last 4 weeks. * Change of benzodiazepines or anti-epileptic medication within the last 4 weeks * Antidepressant drugs taken for less than 4 weeks (i.e., recently initiated) * Neurological disorders, including but not limited to history of seizures (except childhood febrile seizures and ECT-induced seizures), dementia, history of stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral aneurysm. * Medical or neurological illness (unstable cardiac disease, AIDS, malignancy, liver or renal impairment) or treatment for a medical disorder that could interfere with study participation; comorbid neurological condition (i.e. seizure disorder, brain tumor) * History of traumatic brain injury that required subsequent cognitive rehabilitation, or cause cognitive sequelae. * Prior brain surgery and/or any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips * Current pregnancy or lactation. If the ability to become pregnant exists, unwillingness to use appropriate birth control measures during study participation * Anything that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study * Non-English speakers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured Durin Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Day 5 of Stimulation.Baseline, Day 5Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the fifth day of the intervention prior to stimulation.
Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured During Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up of Stimulation.Baseline, two-week follow-up visitFourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the two-week follow-up after intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Day 5 of Intervention and Changes in Symptoms of Depression.Baseline, Day 5Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline to Day 5 and the two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.
Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up and Depression Symptoms.Baseline, two-week follow-up visitCorrelation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline, Day 5 and to two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)
10 Hz tACS with a zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA for 40 minutes. tACS: XCSITE100
10
Sham Stimulation
20 seconds of ramp-up, 40 seconds of 10 Hz tACS with zero-to-peak amplitude of 1 mA, and 20 seconds of ramp-down for a total of 80 seconds of stimulation. Sham tACS: XCSITE100
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)Sham StimulationTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 109 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured During Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up of Stimulation.

Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the two-week follow-up after intervention.

Time frame: Baseline, two-week follow-up visit

Population: Data for 1 participant unavailable due to missed visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured During Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up of Stimulation.-0.016 microvolts^2/HzStandard Deviation 0.199
Sham StimulationChange in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured During Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up of Stimulation.0.012 microvolts^2/HzStandard Deviation 0.243
p-value: 0.79t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured Durin Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Day 5 of Stimulation.

Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes. The difference between the baseline recording on the first day of stimulation is compared to the recording on the fifth day of the intervention prior to stimulation.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 5

Population: Day 5 - Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)Change in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured Durin Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Day 5 of Stimulation.0.042 microvolts^2/HzStandard Deviation 0.221
Sham StimulationChange in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations Measured Durin Resting-state EEG Recordings From Baseline to Day 5 of Stimulation.0.169 microvolts^2/HzStandard Deviation 0.338
p-value: 0.332t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Day 5 of Intervention and Changes in Symptoms of Depression.

Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline to Day 5 and the two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 5

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Day 5 of Intervention and Changes in Symptoms of Depression.-0.263 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Sham StimulationCorrelation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Day 5 of Intervention and Changes in Symptoms of Depression.-0.109 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
p-value: 0.464Pearson's correlation
p-value: 0.765Pearson's correlation
Secondary

Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up and Depression Symptoms.

Correlation Coefficient (r) will be used to determine if there is a relationship between the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline, Day 5 and to two-week follow up and change in the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations before stimulation at baseline and Day 5 of stimulation. The HDRS is a clinician-rated measure of depression severity where higher scores indicate greater depression severity. To calculate the amplitude of left frontal alpha oscillations, Fourier transform is applied to 2 second epochs of resting-state EEG data and averaged across epochs. The amplitude of alpha oscillations is calculated and averaged across left frontal electrodes.

Time frame: Baseline, two-week follow-up visit

Population: Data for 1 participant unavailable due to missed visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alpha Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)Correlation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up and Depression Symptoms.0.624 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Sham StimulationCorrelation Between Changes in the Amplitude of Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations From Baseline to Two-week Follow-up and Depression Symptoms.0.087 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
p-value: 0.072Pearson's correlation
p-value: 0.811Pearson's correlation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026