Skip to content

ROTEM-guided Transfusion Protocol in Attempt to Reduce Blood Transfusions in Major Oncological Surgery

ROTEM-guided Transfusion Protocol Versus Standard Care in Attempt to Reduce Blood Transfusions in Potentially Curative Major Abdominal and Urological Oncological Surgery

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03993977
Acronym
ROTEM-SUR
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-06-21
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
2020-10-13
Last updated
2020-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Loss Requiring Transfusion, Blood Loss, Surgical, Coagulation Defect; Acquired

Keywords

ROTEM, thromboelastometry, blood transfusion, cancer, surgery, abdominal, oncological

Brief summary

Need for perioperative blood transfusion is still high in certain types of oncological abdominal surgery. Allogeneic blood transfusion may be detrimental in cancer patients undergoing a potentially curative resection of malignant tumor, although the detailed mechanism of this effect is still under debate. We plan to evaluate whether a new, rotational thromboelastography-guided algorithm (ROTEM) to guide hemostatic resuscitation intra-operatively decreases the use of allogeneic blood products, the total amount of bleeding, transfusion related side effects, thromboembolic complications and costs. Its effect on each patient's post-operative hemostatic profile is also measured. 60 patients having a potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy (or resection of cauda of pancreas), total removal or partial resection of kidney and open radical cystectomy are recruited when an active blood loss of more than 1500 ml is estimated and/or measured and are randomized into two groups: one will be treated conventionally, ie. using massive transfusion protocol (MTP) if necessary, clinical judgement and conventional coagulation tests, the other treated using a ROTEM-based algorithm.

Interventions

ROTEM-guided protocol of hemostatic resuscitation

OTHERConventional treatment

Clinical judgement and conventional coagulation tests

Sponsors

Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants do not know which group he/she is randomized into. They are under general anaesthesia, thus not knowing which protocol is used. When assessing outcomes, two groups are labeled only by number: the assessor does not know which arm is number 1 or 2 until whole data is analyzed.

Intervention model description

60 patients having a potentially curative abdomino-oncological surgery and reaching an active blood loss of more than 1500 ml are randomized into two groups. One will be treated conventionally, ie. using MTP if necessary, clinical judgement and conventional coagulation tests, the other treated using a ROTEM-based algorithm. Randomization (ratio 1:1 in blocks of 10) between the two groups will be done beforehand. Each paper containing the treatment protocol in question will be put into a closed envelope. The envelopes are numbered from 1 to 60 and are placed in a box in the operative department.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 18, radical cystectomy, total or partial nephrectomy for malignant disease or pancreaticoduodenectomy planned and estimated intraoperative hemorrhage over 1500ml, written and informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Known hemophilia or von Willebrandt's disease (treatment planned beforehand in collaboration with haematologist), unacceptance of allogeneic blood products (jehovah's witnesses).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of transfused red blood cell (RBC) units24 hours after beginning of surgeryRed blood cell units transfused per patient during operation or up to 24 hours after beginning of surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensive care admissions30 days after surgeryNumber of patients admitted to intensive care or high dependency, if this is considered associating with the surgery
Length of hospital stay30 days after surgeryNumber of days patient is in hospital immediately after surgery
Transfusion-related side effects30 days after surgeryAny side-effect considered or suspected originating from blood product transfusion
Thromboembolic events30 days after surgeryClinically diagnosed deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, stroke or other thromboembolic event

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Signs of altered coagulation12-24 hours after surgeryPossible signs hypercoagulopathy in thromboelastometry: EXTEM value of more than 72 mm

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026