Skip to content

This Study Observes the Usage of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Elderly Patients With a Heart Rhythm Disorder in Spain

Non-Interventional, Cross-sectional Study to Describe NOACs Management in Elderly Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) in Spain.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03993119
Enrollment
500
Registered
2019-06-20
Start date
2019-07-30
Completion date
2020-08-20
Last updated
2021-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

This is an observational, multicenter and cross-sectional study in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) elderly patients currently on Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment for their stroke prevention.

Interventions

DRUGNon-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients are willing and provide written informed consent prior to participate in this study * Patients ≥ 75 years-old at the time of the study visit. * Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). * Patients who are being treated with NOAC treatment according to the indication approved in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). * Patients who have started the NOAC treatment at least 3 months prior to the study visit.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from participating in this study if the following criterion is met: * Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device. * Patients who have any contraindication for NOAC treatment, according to the SmPC.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to sex is reported.
Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to SexAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to sex is reported.
Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)At the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to patients' age is reported.
Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Patient's Age (Categorical)At the single study visit (Day 1).Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patient's age (categorical) is reported.
Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to a prior diagnosis of heart failure is reported.
Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to a prior diagnosis of heart failure is reported.
Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the study visit according to patients' coronary artery disease is reported.
Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Coronary Artery DiseaseAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patients' coronary artery disease is reported.
Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to patients' diabetes is reported.
Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to DiabetesAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patients' diabetes is reported.
Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to patients' chronic kidney disease is reported.
Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patients' chronic kidney disease is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Creatinine Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Serum creatinine concentration from the last available blood sample analysis was retrieved from patients' medical records. Serum creatinine concentration from the last available blood sample analysis according to current NOAC type is reported.
Creatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve the creatinine clearance (CrCl). These results were directly collected in the Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). In cases where CrCl was not available in patients's medical record but serum creatinine was available, CrCl was estimated using Cockcroft-Gault formula: CrCl = (140 - Age(years)) x Weight (kilogram) x \[0.85 if female\] / 72 x \[Serum Creatinine (milligram/deciliterL)\] Reported are Crcl values which are calculated according to: * Cockcroft-Gault formula and CrCl values directly collected in the eCRF * Cockcroft-Gault formula only * Directly collected in the eCRF
Bilirubin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients's medical records were used to retrieve bilirubin concentration. Bilirubin concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve bilirubin concentration. Bilirubin concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.
Number of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve the creatinine clearance (CrCl). These results were directly collected in the Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). In cases where CrCl was not available in patients' medical record but serum creatinine was available, CrCl was estimated using Cockcroft-Gault formula: CrCl = (140 - Age(years)) x Weight (kilogram) x \[0.85 if female\] / 72 x \[Serum Creatinine (milligram/deciliterL)\] The number of participants for each of the following creatinine clearance (CrCl) ranges is reported: * CrCl ≥90: Kidney damage with normal or increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) * CrCl 60-89: Kidney damage with mild decreased GFR * CrCl 30-59: Moderate decrease in GFR * CrCl 15-29: Severe decrease in GFR * CrCl \<15: Kidney failure
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve AST concentration. AST concentration from the last available blood sample according to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported.
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients's medical records were used to retrieve ALT concentration. ALT concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.
Haemoglobin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve haemoglobin concentration. Haemoglobin concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.
Platelet Levels From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients's medical records were used to retrieve platelet levels. Platelet levels from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve serum creatinine, ALT, AST, bilirubin, hemoglobin concentration and platelet levels. For each reported laboratory parameter the values were categorized in two categories: Serum creatinine: * Normal value : 0.6-1.2 mg/dl in males and 0.5-1.1 mg/dl in females * High/low value ALT: * Normal values: 7-55 units per liter (UI/L) * High/low values AST: * Normal values: 8-48 UI/L * High/low values Bilirubin: * Normal values: 0.2-1.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dl) * High/low values Haemoglobin: * Normal values: 12-18 gram/deciliter (g/dL) * High/low values Platelets: * Normal values: 150-450 x10\^3/µL * High/low values
Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (day 1).The number of years since NVAF diagnosis was obtained from number of years between date of NVAF diagnosis and date of study visit. The date of NVAF diagnosis was retrieved from patient's medical records. The number of years since NVAF diagnosis and date of study visit is reported for: * All patients; * Patients treated previously with vitamin K antagonists (VKA); * Patients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant .
Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (day 1).NVAF was categorized in four categories: * Persistent; * Long standing persistent; * Permanent; * Paroxysmal.
Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC TypeAt the single study visit (day 1).The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score of atrial fibrillation is a classification system for the extent of atrial fibrillation. It places patients in one of five categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina. The EHRA categories are the following: 1-no symptoms 2a-mild symptoms; normal daily activity not affected. 2b-moderate symptoms; normal daily activity not affected. 3-severe symptoms; normal daily activity affected. 4-disabling; normal daily activity discontinued.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients with (category Yes) and without (category No) cardioversion, ablation, coronary interventions and pacemaker carrier according to current NOAC type is reported.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients in each category of coronary interventions according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. Coronary interventions were categorized in: * Percutaneous coronary intervention and * Coronary artery bypass grafting.
Clinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients in each category of heart failure, coronary artery disease, sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. Heart failure, coronary artery disease, sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia were categorized in the following two categories: * No; * Yes.
Clinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).The NYHA provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure and it has 4 categories: * A - No objective evidence of cardiovascular disease * B - Objective evidence of minimal cardiovascular disease * C - Objective evidence of moderately severe cardiovascular disease * D - Objective evidence of severe cardiovascular disease Number of heart failure patients in each category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification according to current NOAC type is reported.
Clinical Risk Factors: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. LVEF was obtained from the patients' medical records.
Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).The Charlson Comorbidity Index is a method of categorizing comorbidities of patients based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis. Each comorbidity category has an associated weight (from 1 to 6), based on the adjusted risk of mortality or resource use, and the sum of all the weights results in a single comorbidity score for a patient. A score of zero indicates that no comorbidities were found. The higher the score, the more likely the predicted outcome will result in mortality or higher resource use. Up to 12 comorbidities with various weightings can result in a maximum score of 24. The minimum score is zero.
Number of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients with (Yes) and without (No) the comorbidities which were included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index according to current NOAC type is reported. The comorbidities which were included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index were the following: * Myocardial infarction * Congestive heart failure * Peripheral vascular disease * Cerebrovascular disease * Dementia * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) * Connective tissue disease * Peptic ulcer disease * Liver disease (No/Mild/Moderate to severe) * Diabetes mellitus (No/Uncomplicated/End-organ damage) * Hemiplegia * Moderate to severe renal disease * Solid Tumor (No/Localized/Metastatic) * Leukaemia * Lymphoma * Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
Number of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reported is the number of patients in each category of: * Any history of thromboembolic events * Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) * Ischemic stroke * Haemorrhagic stroke * Embolism systemic * Deep vein thrombosis * Pulmonary embolism. Any history of thromboembolic events, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), ischemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, embolism systemic, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were categorized in the following two categories: * No * Yes.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients in each category of stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. Stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation were categorized in the following 2 categories: * Yes; * No.
Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Second NOAC treatment duration (in years) according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Total Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Total number of thromboembolic events, number of each type of thromboembolic events, number of stable and unstable anginas, and number of ST and non-ST myocardial infarction according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported.
Number of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients with (category Yes) and without (category No) any history of bleeding events and number of patients in each category of the following bleeding types is reported: * Intracranial * Digestive * Genitourinary * Gingival * Nasal * Pulmonary * Articular-muscular * Conjunctival. Intracranial, digestive, genitourinary, gingival, nasal, pulmonary, articular-muscular, conjunctival were categorized in two categories: * No * Yes.
Total Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Total number of bleeding events and number of bleeding events for the following bleeding types is reported: * Intracranial * Digestive * Genitourinary * Gingival * Nasal * Pulmonary * Articular-muscular * Conjunctival.
CHA2DS2-VASc Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).The Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (\> 75), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/TIA, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex Category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score is a clinical prediction rule to estimate the risk of stroke in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF); it is frequently used to determine the need for an anticoagulation therapy, relating the high scores to a great risk of stroke and a low score corresponds to a lower risk of stroke. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.
Number of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).The Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (\> 75), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/TIA, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex Category (CHA2DS2-VASc) total score was categorized in three categories, according to the risk of stroke: * Low risk (score 0 in male; score 1 in female) * Moderate risk (score 1 in male; score 2 in female) * High risk (score ≥2 in male; score ≥3 in female)
HAS-BLED Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol (HAS-BLED) score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. The high scores indicate a greater risk of bleeding and a low score corresponds to a lower risk of bleeding.
Number of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).The Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol (HAS-BLED) total score was categorized in three categories according to the bleeding risk: * Low risk (score 0) * Intermediate risk (score 1-2) * High risk (score ≥3)
Number of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients in each category (No;Yes) of any concomitant treatments to NOAC and number of patients in each category (No; Yes) for each concomitant treatment to NOAC at study visit according to current NOAC type is reported. The concomitant treatment to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) were the following: * Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers (ARB) or Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACE) inhibitor * Beta-blocker * Calcium channel blockers * Diuretics * Amiodarone * Statin * Proton pump inhibitor * H2-receptor antagonist * Digoxin * NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs) * Dronedarone * Ketoconazole * Cyclosporine * Itraconazole * Other antiarrhythmics
Number of Patients in Each Category of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients in each category of previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) treatment according to duration since the first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation is reported. Previous VKA treatment was categorized in 2 categories: * No; * Yes.
Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Acenocoumarol and Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Warfarin According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients treated previously (before they were treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)) with the Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) acenocoumarol and number of patients treated previously with the VKA warfarin according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Duration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Duration of treatment (in years) is reported for: * All patients treated previously with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) (row:All patients treated previously with VKA) * Patients treated only with the VKA warfarin (row: Warfarin patients) * Patients treated only with the VKA acenocoumarol (row: Acenocoumarol patients)
Duration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Duration (in years) since non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) diagnosis until first NOAC initiation according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported for: * All patients * Patients treated previously with VKA * Patients treated only with NOAC as anticoagulant (AC)
First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban as first NOAC and number of patients who received dabigatran 110 mg BID (twice daily), dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD as first NOAC according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients who changed (increased and decreased) and did not change the first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Treatment duration (in years) is reported for: * Patients who stopped first NOAC treatment; * Patients who did not stop the first NOAC treatment.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for first NOAC treatment discontinuation was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for first NOAC treatment change was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of switches to a new non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) per patient according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients based on the number of switches to a new NOAC per patient according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported. Number of switches to a new NOAC was categorized in 3 categories: * 0 switches * 1 switch * 2 switches.
Total Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Total number of switches according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for switch was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban as second NOAC and number of patients who received dabigatran 110 mg BID (twice daily), dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD as second NOAC according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients who changed (increased or decreased) and did not change the second non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for second non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment discontinuation was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for second NOAC treatment change was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban as third NOAC and number of patients who received dabigatran 110 mg BID (twice daily), dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD as third NOAC according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients who changed (increased and decreased) and did not change the third non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Duration of third NOAC treatment for patients who stopped NOAC treatment.
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for Third NOAC treatment discontinuation was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for Third NOAC treatment change was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event
Duration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Duration (in years) in NOAC treatment is reported for: * All patients (patients who received or did not receive VKA) * Patients treated previously with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) * Patients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant
Number of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients in each category of total time in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported. Total time in NOAC treatment was categorized in 4 categories: * \<1 year; * 1-2 years; * 2-3 years; * \>3 years.
Number of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients for each type of following antiplatelet treatment that the patients ever received is reported: * None (reports the patients who did not receive any antiplatelet treatment) * Acetyl salicylic acid * Clopidogrel * Prasugrel * Ticlopidine * Ticagrelor * Cilostazol * Triflusal * Dipyridamole * Others (other antiplatelet treatment than above mentioned).
Number of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Number of patients for each of the following antiplatelet treatment types at the time of study visit according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported: * None (reports the patients who did not receive any antiplatelet treatment) * Acetyl salicylic acid * Clopidogrel * Prasugrel * Ticlopidine * Ticagrelor * Cilostazol * Triflusal * Dipyridamole * Others (other antiplatelet treatment than above mentioned).
Time in Treatment With Antiplatelet Agents (in Years) According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAt the single study visit (Day 1).Time in treatment with antiplatelet agents (in years) according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.
Number of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is used commonly to assess frailty. It is a 9-point scale from 1 to 9 (1=very fit; 2=well; 3=Managing well; 4=Vulnerable; 5=Mildly frail; 6=Moderately frail; 7=Severely frail; 8=very severely frail; 9=terminally ill) that summarizes the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult after they had been evaluated by a health care professional. Applying the CFS to patients is quick and requires data collection by watching the patient (mobilize), inquiring about their habitual physical activity and ability. A person with a score \>4 was considered frail.
Number of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is used commonly to assess frailty. It is a 9-point scale from 1 to 9 (1=very fit; 2=well; 3=Managing well; 4=Vulnerable; 5=Mildly frail; 6=Moderately frail; 7=Severely frail; 8=very severely frail; 9=terminally ill) that summarizes the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult after they had been evaluated by a health care professional. Applying the CFS to patients is quick and requires data collection by watching the patient (mobilize), inquiring about their habitual physical activity and ability. CFS was categorized in two categories, according to this ranges: * Frailty patients - CFS scoring \>4 * Non-frailty patients - CFS scoring ≤4
Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypeAt the single study visit (Day 1).Reason for First NOAC usage was categorized in the following two categories: * Primary prevention; * Secondary prevention.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a non-Interventional, cross-sectional study to describe NOACs management in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Spain. RE-BELD Study.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the study. Study visit was a routine visit, one of those visits already scheduled in order to follow up the patients' NVAF (Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation). Patients were considered included when they agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dabigatran
Patients in this arm were on treatment with dabigatran (either were receiving 110 milligram (mg) dabigatran twice daily (BID) or 150 mg dabigatran BID) at the time of study visit for their non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), according to the indication approved in their Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and had initiated treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) at least 3 months before the study visit.
192
Rivaroxaban
Patients in this arm were on treatment with rivaroxaban (either were receiving 15 milligram (mg) rivaroxaban once daily (QD) or 20 mg rivaroxaban QD) at the time of study visit for their non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), according to the indication approved in their Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and had initiated treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) at least 3 months before the study visit.
76
Apixaban
Patients in this arm were on treatment with Apixaban (either were receiving 2.5 milligram (mg) apixaban twice daily (BID) or 5 mg apixaban BID) at the time of study visit for their non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), according to the indication approved in their Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and had initiated treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) at least 3 months before the study visit.
166
Edoxaban
Patients in this arm were on treatment with Edoxaban (either were receiving 30 milligram (mg) edoxaban once daily (QD) or 60 mg edoxaban QD) at the time of study visit for their non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), according to the indication approved in their Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and had initiated treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) at least 3 months before the study visit.
66
Total500

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRivaroxabanTotalEdoxabanDabigatranApixaban
Age, Continuous80.89 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.64
81.48 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73
82.02 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
80.83 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
82.29 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Alcohol consumption
Abuse
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Alcohol consumption
Casual or non-consumer
66 Participants405 Participants56 Participants149 Participants134 Participants
Alcohol consumption
Dependence
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Alcohol consumption
Habitual
6 Participants41 Participants3 Participants19 Participants13 Participants
Body Mass Index28.13 kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.77
28.27 kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.42
27.46 kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88
28.58 kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.06
28.32 kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.71
Body mass index categorical (BMI cat)
Normal weight: 18.5 kg m2≤ BMI≤ 25 kg/m2
16 Participants89 Participants12 Participants25 Participants36 Participants
Body mass index categorical (BMI cat)
Obese: 30 kg/m2<BMI≤ 35 kg/m2
17 Participants92 Participants9 Participants33 Participants33 Participants
Body mass index categorical (BMI cat)
Overweight: 25 kg/m2< BMI≤ 30 kg/m2
31 Participants168 Participants21 Participants61 Participants55 Participants
Body mass index categorical (BMI cat)
Severely Obese: BMI> 35 kg/m2
3 Participants25 Participants2 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Body mass index categorical (BMI cat)
Underweight: BMI< 18.5 kg/m2
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Caregiver
No
41 Participants251 Participants39 Participants93 Participants78 Participants
Caregiver
Yes
30 Participants212 Participants24 Participants76 Participants82 Participants
Height160.88 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88
162.77 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.86
162.93 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.75
163.86 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28
162.64 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61
Place where patient is living
At home with partner/other family member/a friend
52 Participants363 Participants45 Participants147 Participants119 Participants
Place where patient is living
Home alone
19 Participants69 Participants10 Participants17 Participants23 Participants
Place where patient is living
Nursing home
0 Participants15 Participants2 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Place where patient is living
Other's home (e.g. family member's)
1 Participants42 Participants9 Participants15 Participants17 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants250 Participants33 Participants77 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants250 Participants33 Participants115 Participants72 Participants
Smoking habit
Ex-smoker
17 Participants145 Participants19 Participants66 Participants43 Participants
Smoking habit
Non-smoker
57 Participants329 Participants45 Participants111 Participants116 Participants
Smoking habit
Smoker
1 Participants12 Participants1 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Weight categorical
≤60 kg
12 Participants62 Participants14 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Weight categorical
>60 kg
58 Participants369 Participants49 Participants130 Participants132 Participants
Weight (Kg)73.23 Kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.57
74.52 Kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.75
71.59 Kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.41
76.33 Kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.53
74.63 Kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 206
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 206
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 206

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart Failure

Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to a prior diagnosis of heart failure is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart Failure2.27 YearsStandard Deviation 2.02
Sex: FemaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart Failure2.41 YearsStandard Deviation 2.02
Primary

Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Chronic Kidney Disease

Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patients' chronic kidney disease is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Chronic Kidney Disease2.34 YearsStandard Deviation 2.05
Sex: FemaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Chronic Kidney Disease2.25 YearsStandard Deviation 1.89
Primary

Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Coronary Artery Disease

Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patients' coronary artery disease is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Coronary Artery Disease2.38 YearsStandard Deviation 2.02
Sex: FemaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Coronary Artery Disease2.04 YearsStandard Deviation 1.99
Primary

Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Diabetes

Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patients' diabetes is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Diabetes2.39 YearsStandard Deviation 2
Sex: FemaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Diabetes2.17 YearsStandard Deviation 2.07
Primary

Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Patient's Age (Categorical)

Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to patient's age (categorical) is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Patient's Age (Categorical)2.33 YearsStandard Deviation 2.07
Sex: FemaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Patient's Age (Categorical)2.32 YearsStandard Deviation 1.93
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Patient's Age (Categorical)2.32 YearsStandard Deviation 2.05
Primary

Number of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Sex

Number of years since first Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation to study visit according to sex is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Sex2.43 YearsStandard Deviation 2.19
Sex: FemaleNumber of Years Since First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation to Study Visit According to Sex2.22 YearsStandard Deviation 1.83
Primary

Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to Sex

Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to sex is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)115 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)30 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)72 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)33 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexDabigatran 110 mg BID56 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexDabigatran 150 mg BID59 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexRivaroxaban 15 mg QD8 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexRivaroxaban 20 mg QD22 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexApixaban 2.5 mg BID31 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexApixaban 5 mg BID41 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexEdoxaban 30 mg QD13 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexEdoxaban 60 mg QD20 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexEdoxaban 30 mg QD18 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)77 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexRivaroxaban 15 mg QD23 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)46 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexApixaban 5 mg BID51 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)94 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexRivaroxaban 20 mg QD23 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)33 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexEdoxaban 60 mg QD15 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexDabigatran 110 mg BID41 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexApixaban 2.5 mg BID43 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Current NOAC Dose According to SexDabigatran 150 mg BID36 Participants
Primary

Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)

Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to patients' age is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)93 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)34 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)59 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)24 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Dabigatran 110 mg BID22 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Dabigatran 150 mg BID71 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD10 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD24 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Apixaban 2.5 mg BID16 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Apixaban 5 mg BID43 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Edoxaban 30 mg QD7 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Edoxaban 60 mg QD17 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Edoxaban 60 mg QD11 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)59 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD9 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Apixaban 2.5 mg BID21 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)23 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Dabigatran 150 mg BID20 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Edoxaban 30 mg QD11 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)48 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD14 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Dabigatran 110 mg BID39 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)22 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Apixaban 5 mg BID27 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)20 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Dabigatran 110 mg BID36 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Apixaban 5 mg BID22 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Dabigatran 150 mg BID4 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD12 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD7 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Edoxaban 30 mg QD13 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)40 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)19 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Apixaban 2.5 mg BID37 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Current NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)59 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Age (Categorical)Edoxaban 60 mg QD7 Participants
Primary

Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart Failure

Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to a prior diagnosis of heart failure is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)129 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)54 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg patients)96 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)37 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureDabigatran 110 mg BID63 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureDabigatran 150 mg BID66 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureRivaroxaban 15 mg QD21 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureRivaroxaban 20 mg QD33 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureApixaban 2.5 mg BID31 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureApixaban 5 mg BID65 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureEdoxaban 30 mg QD16 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureEdoxaban 60 mg QD21 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureEdoxaban 30 mg QD15 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)63 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureRivaroxaban 15 mg QD10 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)22 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureApixaban 5 mg BID27 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg patients)70 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureRivaroxaban 20 mg QD12 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)29 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureEdoxaban 60 mg QD14 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureDabigatran 110 mg BID34 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureApixaban 2.5 mg BID43 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to a Prior Diagnosis of Heart FailureDabigatran 150 mg BID29 Participants
Primary

Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney Disease

Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to patients' chronic kidney disease is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)166 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)64 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)130 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)48 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseDabigatran 110 mg BID76 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseDabigatran 150 mg BID90 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseRivaroxaban 15 mg QD19 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseRivaroxaban 20mg QD45 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseApixaban 2.5 mg BID43 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseApixaban 5 mg BID87 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseEdoxaban 30 mg QD17 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseEdoxaban 60 mg QD31 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseEdoxaban 30 mg QD14 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)26 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseRivaroxaban 15 mg QD12 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)12 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseApixaban 5 mg BID5 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)36 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseRivaroxaban 20mg QD0 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)18 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseEdoxaban 60 mg QD4 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseDabigatran 110 mg BID21 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseApixaban 2.5 mg BID31 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Chronic Kidney DiseaseDabigatran 150 mg BID5 Participants
Primary

Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery Disease

Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the study visit according to patients' coronary artery disease is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)156 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)63 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)142 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)53 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseDabigatran 110 mg BID78 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseDabigatran 150 mg BID78 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseRivaroxaban 15 mg QD23 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseRivaroxaban 20 mg QD40 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseApixaban 2.5 mg BID62 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseApixaban 5 mg BID80 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseEdoxaban 30 mg QD23 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseEdoxaban 60 mg QD30 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseEdoxaban 30 mg QD8 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)35 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseRivaroxaban 15 mg QD8 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)13 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseApixaban 5 mg BID11 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)21 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseRivaroxaban 20 mg QD5 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)13 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseEdoxaban 60 mg QD5 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseDabigatran 110 mg BID19 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseApixaban 2.5 mg BID10 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Coronary Artery DiseaseDabigatran 150 mg BID16 Participants
Primary

Type of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to Diabetes

Number of patients receiving dabigatran (Current NOAC: Dabigatran), rivaroxaban (Current NOAC: Rivaroxaban), apixaban (Current NOAC: Apixaban), edoxaban (Current NOAC: Edoxaban), dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) BID, dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD at the time of study visit according to patients' diabetes is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)135 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)51 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)113 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)47 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesDabigatran 110 mg BID68 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesDabigatran 150 mg BID67 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesRivaroxaban 15 mg QD22 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesRivaroxaban 20 mg QD29 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesApixaban 2.5 mg BID51 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesApixaban 5 mg BID62 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesEdoxaban 30 mg QD21 Participants
Sex: MaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesEdoxaban 60 mg QD26 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesEdoxaban 30 mg QD10 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)57 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesRivaroxaban 15 mg QD9 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)25 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesApixaban 5 mg BID30 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)53 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesRivaroxaban 20 mg QD16 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesCurrent NOAC: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)19 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesEdoxaban 60 mg QD9 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesDabigatran 110 mg BID29 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesApixaban 2.5 mg BID23 Participants
Sex: FemaleType of Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and NOAC Dose According to DiabetesDabigatran 150 mg BID28 Participants
Secondary

Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

The Charlson Comorbidity Index is a method of categorizing comorbidities of patients based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis. Each comorbidity category has an associated weight (from 1 to 6), based on the adjusted risk of mortality or resource use, and the sum of all the weights results in a single comorbidity score for a patient. A score of zero indicates that no comorbidities were found. The higher the score, the more likely the predicted outcome will result in mortality or higher resource use. Up to 12 comorbidities with various weightings can result in a maximum score of 24. The minimum score is zero.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleAge-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Sex: FemaleAge-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Age: ≥85 YearsAge-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5.99 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
EdoxabanAge-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type6.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Secondary

Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients's medical records were used to retrieve ALT concentration. ALT concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type22.38 units per liter (UI/L)Standard Deviation 13.66
Sex: FemaleAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type18.28 units per liter (UI/L)Standard Deviation 8.95
Age: ≥85 YearsAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type21.52 units per liter (UI/L)Standard Deviation 17.81
EdoxabanAlanine Aminotransferase (ALT) From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type20.15 units per liter (UI/L)Standard Deviation 20.76
Secondary

Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve AST concentration. AST concentration from the last available blood sample according to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type24.13 international units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 11.34
Sex: FemaleAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type21.60 international units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 7.43
Age: ≥85 YearsAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type25.57 international units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 16.01
EdoxabanAspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type20.81 international units per liter (IU/L)Standard Deviation 8.58
Secondary

Bilirubin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients's medical records were used to retrieve bilirubin concentration. Bilirubin concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve bilirubin concentration. Bilirubin concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleBilirubin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type0.83 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.47
Sex: FemaleBilirubin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type0.79 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.51
Age: ≥85 YearsBilirubin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type0.74 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.47
EdoxabanBilirubin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type0.75 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

CHA2DS2-VASc Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

The Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (\> 75), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/TIA, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex Category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score is a clinical prediction rule to estimate the risk of stroke in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF); it is frequently used to determine the need for an anticoagulation therapy, relating the high scores to a great risk of stroke and a low score corresponds to a lower risk of stroke. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleCHA2DS2-VASc Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Sex: FemaleCHA2DS2-VASc Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Age: ≥85 YearsCHA2DS2-VASc Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
EdoxabanCHA2DS2-VASc Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Secondary

Clinical Risk Factors: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. LVEF was obtained from the patients' medical records.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type59.47 percent ejection fraction (%)Standard Deviation 9.66
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type59.43 percent ejection fraction (%)Standard Deviation 10.45
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type58.85 percent ejection fraction (%)Standard Deviation 12.27
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type57.91 percent ejection fraction (%)Standard Deviation 12.57
Secondary

Clinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

The NYHA provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure and it has 4 categories: * A - No objective evidence of cardiovascular disease * B - Objective evidence of minimal cardiovascular disease * C - Objective evidence of moderately severe cardiovascular disease * D - Objective evidence of severe cardiovascular disease Number of heart failure patients in each category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification according to current NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS with heart failure. NYHA classification for heart failure patients is missing.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeB - Objective evidence of minimal cardiovascular disease39 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeC - Objective evidence of moderately severe cardiovascular disease18 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeA - No objective evidence of cardiovascular disease2 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeD - Objective evidence of severe cardiovascular disease2 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeA - No objective evidence of cardiovascular disease0 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeB - Objective evidence of minimal cardiovascular disease12 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeD - Objective evidence of severe cardiovascular disease2 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeC - Objective evidence of moderately severe cardiovascular disease6 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeA - No objective evidence of cardiovascular disease3 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeD - Objective evidence of severe cardiovascular disease4 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeC - Objective evidence of moderately severe cardiovascular disease29 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeB - Objective evidence of minimal cardiovascular disease25 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeC - Objective evidence of moderately severe cardiovascular disease12 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeB - Objective evidence of minimal cardiovascular disease8 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeD - Objective evidence of severe cardiovascular disease2 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Heart Failure Patients in Each Category of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeA - No objective evidence of cardiovascular disease0 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Number of patients in each category of heart failure, coronary artery disease, sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. Heart failure, coronary artery disease, sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia were categorized in the following two categories: * No; * Yes.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureNo129 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureYes63 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseNo156 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseYes35 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeNo170 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeYes19 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionNo46 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionYes146 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaNo76 Participants
Sex: MaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaYes116 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseNo63 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaNo28 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseYes13 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeNo70 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeYes6 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionNo13 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaYes48 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionYes63 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureNo54 Participants
Sex: FemaleClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureYes22 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionYes144 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionNo22 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaYes97 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureNo96 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseYes21 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeYes11 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaNo68 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureYes70 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeNo152 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseNo142 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeNo57 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionYes59 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndromeYes9 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaYes49 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHypertensionNo7 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureYes29 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseNo53 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery diseaseYes13 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHeart failureNo37 Participants
EdoxabanClinical Risk Factors: Number of Patients in Each Category of Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Sleep Apnoea-hypopnoea Syndrome, Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHyperlipidaemiaNo17 Participants
Secondary

Creatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve the creatinine clearance (CrCl). These results were directly collected in the Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). In cases where CrCl was not available in patients's medical record but serum creatinine was available, CrCl was estimated using Cockcroft-Gault formula: CrCl = (140 - Age(years)) x Weight (kilogram) x \[0.85 if female\] / 72 x \[Serum Creatinine (milligram/deciliterL)\] Reported are Crcl values which are calculated according to: * Cockcroft-Gault formula and CrCl values directly collected in the eCRF * Cockcroft-Gault formula only * Directly collected in the eCRF

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCrCl calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula and CrCl values directly collected in the eCRF63.50 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 18.49
Sex: MaleCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDirectly collected in the eCRF66.27 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 17.27
Sex: MaleCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCalculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula only62.72 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 18.82
Sex: FemaleCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCrCl calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula and CrCl values directly collected in the eCRF55.42 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 17.59
Sex: FemaleCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDirectly collected in the eCRF59.98 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 16.47
Sex: FemaleCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCalculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula only54.59 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 17.79
Age: ≥85 YearsCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCalculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula only53.77 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 19.35
Age: ≥85 YearsCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCrCl calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula and CrCl values directly collected in the eCRF54.45 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 18.65
Age: ≥85 YearsCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDirectly collected in the eCRF56.30 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 16.69
EdoxabanCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCrCl calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula and CrCl values directly collected in the eCRF53.04 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 18.4
EdoxabanCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDirectly collected in the eCRF53.59 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 17.69
EdoxabanCreatinine Clearance From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCalculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula only52.83 milliliter/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 18.84
Secondary

Duration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Duration (in years) in NOAC treatment is reported for: * All patients (patients who received or did not receive VKA) * Patients treated previously with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) * Patients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleDuration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAll patients0.29 YearsStandard Deviation 0.03
Sex: MaleDuration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant0.29 YearsStandard Deviation 0.03
Sex: MaleDuration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated previously with VKA0.29 YearsStandard Deviation 0.03
Sex: FemaleDuration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAll patients2.45 YearsStandard Deviation 1.96
Sex: FemaleDuration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated previously with VKA2.39 YearsStandard Deviation 1.98
Sex: FemaleDuration (in Years) in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant2.54 YearsStandard Deviation 1.94
Secondary

Duration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation

Duration of treatment (in years) is reported for: * All patients treated previously with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) (row:All patients treated previously with VKA) * Patients treated only with the VKA warfarin (row: Warfarin patients) * Patients treated only with the VKA acenocoumarol (row: Acenocoumarol patients)

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleDuration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAcenocoumarol patients3.65 YearsStandard Deviation 3.85
Sex: MaleDuration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAll patients treated previously with VKA3.65 YearsStandard Deviation 3.85
Sex: FemaleDuration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAcenocoumarol patients3.88 YearsStandard Deviation 4.14
Sex: FemaleDuration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationWarfarin patients3.35 YearsStandard Deviation 1.94
Sex: FemaleDuration of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAll patients treated previously with VKA3.87 YearsStandard Deviation 4.07
Secondary

Duration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Duration (in years) since non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) diagnosis until first NOAC initiation according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported for: * All patients * Patients treated previously with VKA * Patients treated only with NOAC as anticoagulant (AC)

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleDuration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAll patients1.62 YearsStandard Deviation 2.77
Sex: MaleDuration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated previously with VKA3.71 YearsStandard Deviation 3.7
Sex: MaleDuration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated with NOAC as first AC0.58 YearsStandard Deviation 1.3
Sex: FemaleDuration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAll patients3.27 YearsStandard Deviation 4.95
Sex: FemaleDuration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated previously with VKA4.84 YearsStandard Deviation 4.79
Sex: FemaleDuration Since Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Diagnosis Until First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients treated with NOAC as first AC0.99 YearsStandard Deviation 4.27
Secondary

First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban as first NOAC and number of patients who received dabigatran 110 mg BID (twice daily), dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD as first NOAC according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Dabigatran ( 110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)23 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)2 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)9 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)5 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Dabigatran 110 mg BID6 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Dabigatran 150 mg BID17 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD0 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD2 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Apixaban 2.5 mg BID4 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Apixaban 5 mg BID5 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Edoxaban 30 mg QD4 Participants
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Edoxaban 60 mg QD1 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Edoxaban 30 mg QD26 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Dabigatran ( 110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)174 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD30 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)81 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Apixaban 5 mg BID90 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)143 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD51 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC received: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)63 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Edoxaban 60 mg QD37 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Dabigatran 110 mg BID88 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Apixaban 2.5 mg BID53 Participants
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and First NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationFirst NOAC dose: Dabigatran 150 mg BID86 Participants
Secondary

First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Treatment duration (in years) is reported for: * Patients who stopped first NOAC treatment; * Patients who did not stop the first NOAC treatment.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients who stopped first NOAC treatment0.01 Years
Sex: MaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients who did not stop the first NOAC treatment0.30 YearsStandard Deviation 0.03
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients who stopped first NOAC treatment1.60 YearsStandard Deviation 1.61
Sex: FemaleFirst Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatients who did not stop the first NOAC treatment2.38 YearsStandard Deviation 1.93
Secondary

Haemoglobin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve haemoglobin concentration. Haemoglobin concentration from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleHaemoglobin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type13.23 gram/deciliter (g/dl)Standard Deviation 1.66
Sex: FemaleHaemoglobin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type13.37 gram/deciliter (g/dl)Standard Deviation 1.61
Age: ≥85 YearsHaemoglobin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type12.99 gram/deciliter (g/dl)Standard Deviation 1.9
EdoxabanHaemoglobin Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type13.17 gram/deciliter (g/dl)Standard Deviation 1.92
Secondary

HAS-BLED Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol (HAS-BLED) score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. The high scores indicate a greater risk of bleeding and a low score corresponds to a lower risk of bleeding.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleHAS-BLED Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Sex: FemaleHAS-BLED Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Age: ≥85 YearsHAS-BLED Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type2.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
EdoxabanHAS-BLED Total Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type2.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Secondary

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type

The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score of atrial fibrillation is a classification system for the extent of atrial fibrillation. It places patients in one of five categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina. The EHRA categories are the following: 1-no symptoms 2a-mild symptoms; normal daily activity not affected. 2b-moderate symptoms; normal daily activity not affected. 3-severe symptoms; normal daily activity affected. 4-disabling; normal daily activity discontinued.

Time frame: At the single study visit (day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type3-severe10 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2a-mild83 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type4-disabling3 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2b-moderate45 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type1-none47 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2b-moderate11 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type3-severe3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type4-disabling0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2a-mild30 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type1-none25 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2b-moderate28 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type1-none52 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2a-mild70 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type3-severe6 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type4-disabling1 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type3-severe3 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2a-mild31 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type1-none17 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type2b-moderate11 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of EHRA Scale for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Related Symptoms According to Current NOAC Type4-disabling0 Participants
Secondary

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

NVAF was categorized in four categories: * Persistent; * Long standing persistent; * Permanent; * Paroxysmal.

Time frame: At the single study visit (day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePersistent32 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePermanent99 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeParoxysmal37 Participants
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLong standing persistent21 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePermanent26 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLong standing persistent3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePersistent11 Participants
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeParoxysmal31 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLong standing persistent10 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePermanent66 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePersistent31 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeParoxysmal53 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLong standing persistent5 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeParoxysmal10 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePermanent36 Participants
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Patients in Each Category of NVAF Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePersistent12 Participants
Secondary

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

The number of years since NVAF diagnosis was obtained from number of years between date of NVAF diagnosis and date of study visit. The date of NVAF diagnosis was retrieved from patient's medical records. The number of years since NVAF diagnosis and date of study visit is reported for: * All patients; * Patients treated previously with vitamin K antagonists (VKA); * Patients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant .

Time frame: At the single study visit (day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAll patients4.78 YearsStandard Deviation 4.26
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant2.79 YearsStandard Deviation 2.71
Sex: MaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated previously with VKA6.30 YearsStandard Deviation 4.59
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAll patients5.85 YearsStandard Deviation 4.7
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant3.52 YearsStandard Deviation 3.21
Sex: FemaleNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated previously with VKA7.95 YearsStandard Deviation 4.87
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated previously with VKA7.60 YearsStandard Deviation 5.43
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAll patients6.01 YearsStandard Deviation 6.54
Age: ≥85 YearsNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant3.95 YearsStandard Deviation 7.28
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAll patients5.63 YearsStandard Deviation 4.99
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated with NOAC as first anticoagulant1.72 YearsStandard Deviation 1.74
EdoxabanNon-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Characteristics: Number of Years Since NVAF Diagnosis According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePatients treated previously with VKA7.59 YearsStandard Deviation 4.94
Secondary

Number of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve the creatinine clearance (CrCl). These results were directly collected in the Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). In cases where CrCl was not available in patients' medical record but serum creatinine was available, CrCl was estimated using Cockcroft-Gault formula: CrCl = (140 - Age(years)) x Weight (kilogram) x \[0.85 if female\] / 72 x \[Serum Creatinine (milligram/deciliterL)\] The number of participants for each of the following creatinine clearance (CrCl) ranges is reported: * CrCl ≥90: Kidney damage with normal or increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) * CrCl 60-89: Kidney damage with mild decreased GFR * CrCl 30-59: Moderate decrease in GFR * CrCl 15-29: Severe decrease in GFR * CrCl \<15: Kidney failure

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type60-89 ml/min/1.73m^255 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type15-29 ml/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type≥90 ml/min/1.73m^214 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type30-59 ml/min/1.73m^272 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type<15 ml/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type30-59 ml/min/1.73m^241 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type60-89 ml/min/1.73m^225 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type≥90 ml/min/1.73m^22 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type15-29 ml/min/1.73m^23 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type<15 ml/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type30-59 ml/min/1.73m^292 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type<15 ml/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type15-29 ml/min/1.73m^210 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type60-89 ml/min/1.73m^246 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type≥90 ml/min/1.73m^28 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type60-89 ml/min/1.73m^218 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type15-29 ml/min/1.73m^27 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type<15 ml/min/1.73m^20 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type30-59 ml/min/1.73m^237 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Participants in Each Category of Creatinine Clearance Range From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type≥90 ml/min/1.73m^21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation

Number of patients for each type of following antiplatelet treatment that the patients ever received is reported: * None (reports the patients who did not receive any antiplatelet treatment) * Acetyl salicylic acid * Clopidogrel * Prasugrel * Ticlopidine * Ticagrelor * Cilostazol * Triflusal * Dipyridamole * Others (other antiplatelet treatment than above mentioned).

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationCilostazol0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationTriflusal0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDipyridamole0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationOthers (other antiplatelet treatment than listed above)0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationNone (no antiplatelet treatment received)35 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAcetyl salicylic acid4 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationClopidogrel1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationPrasugrel0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationTiclopidine0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationTicagrelor0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationPrasugrel2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationCilostazol0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAcetyl salicylic acid124 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationTriflusal3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationTicagrelor1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDipyridamole0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationClopidogrel43 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationOthers (other antiplatelet treatment than listed above)0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationTiclopidine1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationNone (no antiplatelet treatment received)314 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients for each of the following antiplatelet treatment types at the time of study visit according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported: * None (reports the patients who did not receive any antiplatelet treatment) * Acetyl salicylic acid * Clopidogrel * Prasugrel * Ticlopidine * Ticagrelor * Cilostazol * Triflusal * Dipyridamole * Others (other antiplatelet treatment than above mentioned).

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNone38 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAcetyl salicylic acid0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationClopidogrel1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPrasugrel0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationTiclopidine0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationTicagrelor0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationCilostazol0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationTriflusal0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationDipyridamole0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationOthers0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationTriflusal3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNone444 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationTicagrelor1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAcetyl salicylic acid9 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationOthers0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationClopidogrel11 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationCilostazol0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPrasugrel0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationDipyridamole0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients for Each Type of Antiplatelet Treatment at the Time of Study Visit According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationTiclopidine0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is used commonly to assess frailty. It is a 9-point scale from 1 to 9 (1=very fit; 2=well; 3=Managing well; 4=Vulnerable; 5=Mildly frail; 6=Moderately frail; 7=Severely frail; 8=very severely frail; 9=terminally ill) that summarizes the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult after they had been evaluated by a health care professional. Applying the CFS to patients is quick and requires data collection by watching the patient (mobilize), inquiring about their habitual physical activity and ability. CFS was categorized in two categories, according to this ranges: * Frailty patients - CFS scoring \>4 * Non-frailty patients - CFS scoring ≤4

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNon-frailty patients (CFS scoring ≤4)159 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeFrailty patients (CFS scoring >4)33 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeFrailty patients (CFS scoring >4)21 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNon-frailty patients (CFS scoring ≤4)55 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNon-frailty patients (CFS scoring ≤4)116 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeFrailty patients (CFS scoring >4)50 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNon-frailty patients (CFS scoring ≤4)52 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category Clinical Frailty Scale at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeFrailty patients (CFS scoring >4)14 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Number of patients with (category Yes) and without (category No) cardioversion, ablation, coronary interventions and pacemaker carrier according to current NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionNo171 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionYes16 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationNo178 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationYes11 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsNo167 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsYes22 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierNo166 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierYes23 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsYes11 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsNo65 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionYes6 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierYes9 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierNo67 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationYes1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationNo75 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionNo70 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierNo151 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationNo160 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationYes6 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsNo148 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsYes17 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierYes15 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionNo151 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionYes14 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAblationYes2 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionYes9 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCardioversionNo57 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsNo60 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierYes8 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePacemaker carrierNo58 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Cardioversion, Ablation, Coronary Interventions and Pacemaker Carrier According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary interventionsYes5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Number of patients in each category of coronary interventions according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. Coronary interventions were categorized in: * Percutaneous coronary intervention and * Coronary artery bypass grafting.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who underwent coronary interventions.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePercutaneous coronary intervention19 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery bypass grafting3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery bypass grafting2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePercutaneous coronary intervention9 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePercutaneous coronary intervention14 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery bypass grafting3 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePercutaneous coronary intervention4 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Coronary Interventions According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCoronary artery bypass grafting1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

The Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol (HAS-BLED) total score was categorized in three categories according to the bleeding risk: * Low risk (score 0) * Intermediate risk (score 1-2) * High risk (score ≥3)

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk45 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntermediate risk147 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntermediate risk64 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk12 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk48 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntermediate risk118 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntermediate risk48 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of HAS-BLED Score According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients based on the number of switches to a new NOAC per patient according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported. Number of switches to a new NOAC was categorized in 3 categories: * 0 switches * 1 switch * 2 switches.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation0 switches38 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation1 switch1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation2 switches0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation0 switches419 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation1 switch36 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation2 switches6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation

Number of patients in each category of previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) treatment according to duration since the first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) initiation is reported. Previous VKA treatment was categorized in 2 categories: * No; * Yes.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationNo26 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationYes13 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationNo187 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Previous Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) Treatment According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationYes274 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Reason for first NOAC treatment change was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Only patients who changed dose in first NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationLack of effectiveness2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationInvestigator's decision24 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatient's decision0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAdverse event8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Reason for first NOAC treatment discontinuation was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Only patients who stopped first NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationLack of effectiveness0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationInvestigator's decision0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatient's decision0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAdverse event1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAdverse event19 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationLack of effectiveness1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatient's decision7 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationInvestigator's decision15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC Type

Reason for First NOAC usage was categorized in the following two categories: * Primary prevention; * Secondary prevention.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypePrimary prevention138 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypeSecondary prevention52 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypeSecondary prevention14 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypePrimary prevention61 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypePrimary prevention135 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypeSecondary prevention31 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypePrimary prevention54 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Usage at the Time of First NOAC Initiation According to Current NOAC TypeSecondary prevention12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Reason for second NOAC treatment change was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who changed dose in second NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationLack of effectiveness0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationInvestigator's decision2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatient's decision0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAdverse event0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Reason for second non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment discontinuation was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who stopped second NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationLack of effectiveness0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationInvestigator's decision2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationPatient's decision0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAdverse event4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Change Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Reason for Third NOAC treatment change was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who changed dose in third NOAC treatment. No patients stopped the third NOAC treatment.

Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Reason for Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Discontinuation According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Reason for Third NOAC treatment discontinuation was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who stopped third NOAC treatment. No patient stopped the third NOAC treatment.

Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients' medical records were used to retrieve serum creatinine, ALT, AST, bilirubin, hemoglobin concentration and platelet levels. For each reported laboratory parameter the values were categorized in two categories: Serum creatinine: * Normal value : 0.6-1.2 mg/dl in males and 0.5-1.1 mg/dl in females * High/low value ALT: * Normal values: 7-55 units per liter (UI/L) * High/low values AST: * Normal values: 8-48 UI/L * High/low values Bilirubin: * Normal values: 0.2-1.2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dl) * High/low values Haemoglobin: * Normal values: 12-18 gram/deciliter (g/dL) * High/low values Platelets: * Normal values: 150-450 x10\^3/µL * High/low values

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinHigh/low levels38 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinNormal levels91 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTNormal levels122 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletHigh/low levels34 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineHigh/low levels27 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinHigh/low levels12 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTHigh/low levels6 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTNormal levels121 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletNormal levels140 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinNormal levels143 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTHigh/low levels6 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineNormal levels132 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineHigh/low levels19 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinHigh/low levels12 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTHigh/low levels1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletHigh/low levels8 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletNormal levels65 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTHigh/low levels1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTNormal levels65 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinNormal levels46 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTNormal levels61 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinHigh/low levels7 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineNormal levels44 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinNormal levels63 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTNormal levels127 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTHigh/low levels11 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTNormal levels133 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTHigh/low levels10 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinNormal levels109 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinHigh/low levels10 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinNormal levels121 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinHigh/low levels44 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletNormal levels128 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletHigh/low levels32 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineNormal levels72 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineHigh/low levels50 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletHigh/low levels16 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinNormal levels50 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinHigh/low levels4 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTHigh/low levels0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineNormal levels32 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeTotal bilirubinNormal levels41 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTHigh/low levels3 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeASTNormal levels59 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeSerum creatinineHigh/low levels15 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypePlateletNormal levels48 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeHemoglobinHigh/low levels14 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Serum Creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin, Hemoglobin and Platelet Levels According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral (NOAC) TypeALTNormal levels59 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC Type

Number of patients in each category of stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported. Stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation were categorized in the following 2 categories: * Yes; * No.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaNo187 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaYes4 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaNo190 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaYes1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationNo183 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationYes8 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationNo183 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationYes8 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationYes8 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationNo65 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationYes4 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationNo69 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaYes1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaNo72 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaNo73 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationNo156 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaNo158 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaYes6 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationNo153 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationYes11 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationYes8 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaNo161 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaYes4 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeUnstable anginaYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeStable anginaNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationNo62 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationYes8 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction without ST segment elevationNo57 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Category of Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation and Myocardial Infarction Without ST Segment Elevation According to Current NOAC TypeMyocardial infarction with ST segment elevationYes3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients in each category of total time in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported. Total time in NOAC treatment was categorized in 4 categories: * \<1 year; * 1-2 years; * 2-3 years; * \>3 years.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation<1 year39 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation1-2 years0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation2-3 years0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation>3 years0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation>3 years151 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation<1 year149 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation2-3 years74 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Category of Total Time in Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation1-2 years87 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is used commonly to assess frailty. It is a 9-point scale from 1 to 9 (1=very fit; 2=well; 3=Managing well; 4=Vulnerable; 5=Mildly frail; 6=Moderately frail; 7=Severely frail; 8=very severely frail; 9=terminally ill) that summarizes the overall level of fitness or frailty of an older adult after they had been evaluated by a health care professional. Applying the CFS to patients is quick and requires data collection by watching the patient (mobilize), inquiring about their habitual physical activity and ability. A person with a score \>4 was considered frail.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5-Mildly frail13 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type2-Well24 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type6-Moderately frail15 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type7-Severely frail4 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type9-Terminally ill0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type3-Managing well79 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1-Very fit11 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4-Vulnerable45 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type8-Very severely frail1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4-Vulnerable11 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type3-Managing well23 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type7-Severely frail3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type9-Terminally ill0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type6-Moderately frail10 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type2-Well15 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type8-Very severely frail0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1-Very fit6 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5-Mildly frail8 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type8-Very severely frail1 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1-Very fit8 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type2-Well18 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type3-Managing well44 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4-Vulnerable46 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5-Mildly frail16 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type6-Moderately frail24 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type7-Severely frail9 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type9-Terminally ill0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type9-Terminally ill0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type7-Severely frail3 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type4-Vulnerable19 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type3-Managing well24 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type8-Very severely frail1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type2-Well9 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1-Very fit0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type6-Moderately frail3 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients in Each Score of Clinical Frailty Scale Grading at the Time of the Study Visit According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type5-Mildly frail7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

The Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (\> 75), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/TIA, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex Category (CHA2DS2-VASc) total score was categorized in three categories, according to the risk of stroke: * Low risk (score 0 in male; score 1 in female) * Moderate risk (score 1 in male; score 2 in female) * High risk (score ≥2 in male; score ≥3 in female)

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate risk0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate risk0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate risk0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk166 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLow risk0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHigh risk66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients on Each Category of CHA2DS2-VASc Score According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate risk0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Acenocoumarol and Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Warfarin According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients treated previously (before they were treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)) with the Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) acenocoumarol and number of patients treated previously with the VKA warfarin according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who previously received VKA treatment. One patient received acenocoumarol and warfarin during the study, so the total percentage is not 100%.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Acenocoumarol and Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Warfarin According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAcenocoumarol13 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Acenocoumarol and Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Warfarin According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationWarfarin0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Acenocoumarol and Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Warfarin According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationAcenocoumarol263 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Acenocoumarol and Number of Patients Treated Previously With the VKA Warfarin According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationWarfarin12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients who changed (increased and decreased) and did not change the first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNo39 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (increase)0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (decrease)0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNo427 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (increase)8 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (decrease)26 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients who changed (increased and decreased) and did not change the third non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who started third NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNo6 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (increase)0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased and Decreased) and Did Not Change the Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (decrease)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients who changed (increased or decreased) and did not change the second non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who stopped the first NOAC treatment and switched to a second NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNo1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (increase)0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (decrease)0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationNo40 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (increase)1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients Who Changed (Increased or Decreased) and Did Not Change the Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationYes (decrease)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Number of patients with (category Yes) and without (category No) any history of bleeding events and number of patients in each category of the following bleeding types is reported: * Intracranial * Digestive * Genitourinary * Gingival * Nasal * Pulmonary * Articular-muscular * Conjunctival. Intracranial, digestive, genitourinary, gingival, nasal, pulmonary, articular-muscular, conjunctival were categorized in two categories: * No * Yes.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsYes14 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalNo191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsNo177 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalNo191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryYes2 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryNo189 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularYes2 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularNo189 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialNo188 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryNo191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialYes3 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalNo191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveYes8 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveNo183 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsNo68 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsYes8 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialNo74 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialYes2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveNo73 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveYes3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalNo75 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalYes1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalNo73 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalYes3 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryYes3 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialYes7 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalYes8 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsNo120 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularNo162 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalYes1 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsYes46 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalNo157 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryNo158 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalNo164 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryNo162 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularYes3 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryYes6 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalYes2 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveYes26 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialNo158 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalNo163 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveNo140 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsNo56 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGingivalYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalNo62 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNasalYes3 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIntracranialNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonaryYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of bleeding eventsYes9 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularNo65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConjunctivalYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryNo63 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveYes3 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeGenitourinaryYes2 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeArticular-muscularYes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Bleeding Events and Number of Patients in Each Category of Bleeding Type According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDigestiveNo62 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Reported is the number of patients in each category of: * Any history of thromboembolic events * Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) * Ischemic stroke * Haemorrhagic stroke * Embolism systemic * Deep vein thrombosis * Pulmonary embolism. Any history of thromboembolic events, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), ischemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, embolism systemic, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were categorized in the following two categories: * No * Yes.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicNo191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeYes1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeNo173 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismYes1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeNo189 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeYes19 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisYes1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsNo153 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)No180 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismNo190 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisNo190 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)Yes10 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsYes39 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisNo71 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsNo53 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsYes23 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)No66 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)Yes9 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeNo65 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeYes7 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeNo73 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicNo73 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisYes2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismNo73 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismYes1 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisNo162 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismNo161 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsYes46 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)Yes8 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisYes2 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsNo120 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicYes0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeYes1 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeYes20 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)No155 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeNo146 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismYes3 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeNo163 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicNo164 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeNo65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHaemorrhagic strokeYes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismNo64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicNo63 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)No64 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeEmbolism systemicYes2 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsYes18 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisNo65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePulmonary embolismYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDeep vein thrombosisYes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeNo60 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAny history of thromboembolic eventsNo48 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeIschemic strokeYes5 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without Any History of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Patients in Each Category of Different Types of Thromboembolic Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeTransient Ischemic Attack (TIA)Yes2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Number of patients with (Yes) and without (No) the comorbidities which were included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index according to current NOAC type is reported. The comorbidities which were included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index were the following: * Myocardial infarction * Congestive heart failure * Peripheral vascular disease * Cerebrovascular disease * Dementia * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) * Connective tissue disease * Peptic ulcer disease * Liver disease (No/Mild/Moderate to severe) * Diabetes mellitus (No/Uncomplicated/End-organ damage) * Hemiplegia * Moderate to severe renal disease * Solid Tumor (No/Localized/Metastatic) * Leukaemia * Lymphoma * Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; No176 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: Yes4 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: No191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: No135 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: Yes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: No161 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: No166 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: Yes1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: Yes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: Yes31 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Moderate to severe0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: Yes63 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: No153 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: No189 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: Yes26 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: Yes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: No192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: Yes3 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: End-organ damage9 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; Yes16 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: Yes39 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: No187 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: Yes20 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: No192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Metastatic1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: Yes5 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: No129 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: No172 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: No192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: No190 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: No188 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: No178 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Localized13 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Mild2 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: Uncomplicated48 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Mild2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: No69 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Moderate to severe0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: Yes2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: No51 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: Yes12 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: Uncomplicated18 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: Yes5 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: End-organ damage7 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; No65 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: No64 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: No76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: Yes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: No63 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: No74 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: Yes13 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: No72 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: No55 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: Yes4 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: Yes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: Yes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: No66 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: No76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: Yes10 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: No76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: No76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: Yes21 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: Yes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Metastatic0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: No74 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: Yes2 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Localized7 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: No74 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: No70 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; Yes11 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: Yes0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; No147 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; Yes18 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: No96 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: Yes70 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: No151 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: Yes15 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: No133 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: Yes33 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: No153 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: Yes13 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: No141 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: Yes24 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: No164 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: Yes2 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: No156 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: Yes10 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: No161 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Mild5 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Moderate to severe0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: No113 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: Uncomplicated36 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: End-organ damage17 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: No164 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: Yes2 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: No130 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: Yes36 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: No148 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Localized16 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Metastatic2 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: No166 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: No165 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: Yes1 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: No165 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: Yes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Mild1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: Yes28 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: No57 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: No65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: Yes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCongestive heart failure: No38 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Localized7 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeptic ulcer disease: No65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: Yes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: Yes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeSolid tumor: Metastatic2 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeConnective tissue disease: No66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: Yes12 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeAIDS: No66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: No66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCOPD: No54 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: Yes6 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDementia: No60 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLeukaemia: Yes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: Yes9 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeCerebrovascular disease: No57 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; Yes11 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: No65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: Yes7 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypePeripheral vascular disease: No59 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: Yes4 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeHemiplegia: No62 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: End-organ damage8 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeMyocardial infarction; No55 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: No48 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: Uncomplicated11 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeDiabetes mellitus: No47 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLymphoma: Yes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeModerate to severe renal disease: Yes18 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With and Without the Comorbidities Included in the Charlson Comorbidity Index According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeLiver disease: Moderate to severe0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC Type

Number of patients in each category (No;Yes) of any concomitant treatments to NOAC and number of patients in each category (No; Yes) for each concomitant treatment to NOAC at study visit according to current NOAC type is reported. The concomitant treatment to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) were the following: * Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers (ARB) or Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACE) inhibitor * Beta-blocker * Calcium channel blockers * Diuretics * Amiodarone * Statin * Proton pump inhibitor * H2-receptor antagonist * Digoxin * NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs) * Dronedarone * Ketoconazole * Cyclosporine * Itraconazole * Other antiarrhythmics

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsNo87 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACYes192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorNo54 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorYes138 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerNo82 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerYes110 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersNo154 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersYes38 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACNo0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsYes105 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneNo174 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneYes18 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinNo83 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinYes109 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorNo89 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorYes103 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistNo191 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistYes1 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinNo168 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinYes24 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsNo180 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsYes12 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneNo192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleNo192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineNo192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleNo192 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleYes0 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsNo188 Participants
Sex: MaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsYes4 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistNo75 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerYes49 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistYes1 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsYes4 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneYes9 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinNo71 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsYes44 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsNo72 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinYes5 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerNo27 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsYes3 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsNo73 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinNo34 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsNo32 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorYes56 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineYes0 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinYes42 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersNo53 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorNo20 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersYes23 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorNo29 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneNo67 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACYes76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorYes47 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineNo76 Participants
Sex: FemaleNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACNo0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsNo160 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsNo56 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsYes110 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineNo166 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneNo146 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneYes20 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinNo77 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinYes89 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineYes0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorNo58 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorYes108 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistNo162 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistYes4 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleNo166 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinNo153 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinYes13 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsNo155 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsYes11 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleYes0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneNo163 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneYes3 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsYes6 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACNo0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACYes166 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleNo166 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorNo57 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorYes109 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerNo54 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerYes112 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleYes0 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersNo136 Participants
Age: ≥85 YearsNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersYes30 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneNo62 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorYes49 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleYes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACNo0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineYes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeProton pump inhibitorNo17 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerYes45 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAny concomitant treatments to NOACYes66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsNo19 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinYes48 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDiureticsYes47 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorNo18 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeKetoconazoleNo66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeStatinNo18 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersYes19 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeARB or ACE inhibitorYes48 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinYes9 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleNo66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsNo65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsNo61 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDigoxinNo57 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeAmiodaroneYes4 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeNSAIDsYes5 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCalcium channel blockersNo47 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeH2-receptor antagonistNo65 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeBeta-blockerNo21 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneNo66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeItraconazoleYes0 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeOther antiarrhythmicsYes1 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeCyclosporineNo66 Participants
EdoxabanNumber of Patients With Any Concomitant Treatments to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) and Number of Patients for Each Concomitant Treatment to NOAC at Study Visit According to Current NOAC TypeDronedaroneYes0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation

Reason for switch was categorized in four categories: * Lack of effectiveness * Investigator's decision * Patient's decision * Adverse event

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who switched to a new NOAC.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sex: MaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationLack of effectiveness0 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: MaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationInvestigator's decision0 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: MaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationPatient's decision0 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: MaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAdverse event1 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: FemaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationAdverse event23 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: FemaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationLack of effectiveness1 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: FemaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationPatient's decision7 Switches to another NOAC
Sex: FemaleNumber of Switches in Each Category of Reason for Switch According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationInvestigator's decision17 Switches to another NOAC
Secondary

Number of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of switches to a new non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) per patient according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleNumber of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation0.03 switches per patientStandard Deviation 0.16
Sex: FemaleNumber of Switches to a New Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Per Patient According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation0.10 switches per patientStandard Deviation 0.35
Secondary

Platelet Levels From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Results from the last available blood sample analysis from patients's medical records were used to retrieve platelet levels. Platelet levels from the last available blood sample according to NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MalePlatelet Levels From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type203.37 x 10^3/microliter (μL)Standard Deviation 60.5
Sex: FemalePlatelet Levels From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type222.07 x 10^3/microliter (μL)Standard Deviation 77.13
Age: ≥85 YearsPlatelet Levels From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type215.59 x 10^3/microliter (μL)Standard Deviation 81.48
EdoxabanPlatelet Levels From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type189.45 x 10^3/microliter (μL)Standard Deviation 68.8
Secondary

Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban as second NOAC and number of patients who received dabigatran 110 mg BID (twice daily), dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD as second NOAC according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Number of patients who stopped the first NOAC treatment and switched to a second NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: MaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Apixaban 2.5 mg BID0 Participants
Sex: MaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)0 Participants
Sex: MaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Apixaban 5 mg BID1 Participants
Sex: MaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)1 Participants
Sex: MaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)0 Participants
Sex: MaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)0 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Dabigatran 150 mg BID2 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD3 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD2 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Apixaban 2.5 mg BID13 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Apixaban 5 mg BID8 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Edoxaban 30 mg QD3 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Edoxaban 60 mg QD5 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Dabigatran (110 mg BID and 150 mg BID patients)8 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Rivaroxaban (15 mg QD and 20 mg QD patients)5 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Apixaban (2.5 mg BID and 5 mg BID patients)21 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC received: Edoxaban (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD patients)8 Participants
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Second NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationSecond NOAC dose: Dabigatran 110 mg BID6 Participants
Secondary

Second Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Second NOAC treatment duration (in years) according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who stopped second NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: FemaleSecond Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation0.49 YearsStandard Deviation 0.39
Secondary

Serum Creatinine Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Serum creatinine concentration from the last available blood sample analysis was retrieved from patients' medical records. Serum creatinine concentration from the last available blood sample analysis according to current NOAC type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleSerum Creatinine Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1.00 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.23
Sex: FemaleSerum Creatinine Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1.05 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.29
Age: ≥85 YearsSerum Creatinine Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1.15 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.41
EdoxabanSerum Creatinine Concentration From the Last Available Blood Sample According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type1.14 milligram/deciliter (mg/dl)Standard Deviation 0.39
Secondary

Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Number of patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban as third NOAC and number of patients who received dabigatran 110 mg BID (twice daily), dabigatran 150 mg BID, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (QD), rivaroxaban 20 mg QD, apixaban 2.5 mg BID, apixaban 5 mg BID, edoxaban 30 mg QD and edoxaban 60 mg QD as third NOAC according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who stopped second NOAC treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC received: Dabigatran1 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC received: Rivaroxaban1 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC received: Apixaban4 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC received:Edoxaban0 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC dose: Dabigatran 110 mg BID1 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC dose: Dabigatran 150 mg BID0 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD1 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC dose: Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD0 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC dose: Apixaban 2.5 mg BID3 Participants
Sex: FemaleThird Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Received and Third NOAC Dose According to Duration Since the First NOAC InitiationThird NOAC dose: Apixaban 5 mg BID1 Participants
Secondary

Third Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Treatment Duration (in Years) According to Duration Since the First NOAC Initiation

Duration of third NOAC treatment for patients who stopped NOAC treatment.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who stopped third NOAC treatment. No patient stopped the third NOAC treatment.

Secondary

Time in Treatment With Antiplatelet Agents (in Years) According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation

Time in treatment with antiplatelet agents (in years) according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleTime in Treatment With Antiplatelet Agents (in Years) According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation5.82 YearsStandard Deviation 1.66
Sex: FemaleTime in Treatment With Antiplatelet Agents (in Years) According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation5.98 YearsStandard Deviation 7.06
Secondary

Total Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Type

Total number of bleeding events and number of bleeding events for the following bleeding types is reported: * Intracranial * Digestive * Genitourinary * Gingival * Nasal * Pulmonary * Articular-muscular * Conjunctival.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of digestive events0.06 eventsStandard Deviation 0.36
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of conjunctival events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of gingival events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of genitourinary events0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of articular-muscular events0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of intracranial events0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of total bleeding events0.10 eventsStandard Deviation 0.42
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of pulmonary events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of nasal events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of nasal events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of total bleeding events0.12 eventsStandard Deviation 0.36
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of intracranial events0.03 eventsStandard Deviation 0.16
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of digestive events0.04 eventsStandard Deviation 0.2
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of genitourinary events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of gingival events0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.11
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of pulmonary events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of articular-muscular events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of conjunctival events0.04 eventsStandard Deviation 0.2
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of total bleeding events0.48 eventsStandard Deviation 1.01
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of gingival events0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.11
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of nasal events0.07 eventsStandard Deviation 0.36
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of intracranial events0.04 eventsStandard Deviation 0.2
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of pulmonary events0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.19
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of conjunctival events0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.08
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of articular-muscular events0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.19
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of genitourinary events0.04 eventsStandard Deviation 0.19
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of digestive events0.27 eventsStandard Deviation 0.8
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of pulmonary events0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of total bleeding events0.28 eventsStandard Deviation 0.82
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of gingival events0.03 eventsStandard Deviation 0.25
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of intracranial events0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of articular-muscular events0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of nasal events0.08 eventsStandard Deviation 0.37
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of genitourinary events0.06 eventsStandard Deviation 0.35
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of conjunctival events0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
EdoxabanTotal Number of Bleeding Events and Number of Each Type of Bleeding Events According to Current Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) TypeNumber of digestive events0.06 eventsStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Total Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Initiation

Total number of switches according to duration since the first NOAC initiation is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Participants of FAS who switched to a new NOAC.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDabigatran to Apixaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationApixaban to Dabigatran0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationRivaroxaban to Dabigatran0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationApixaban to Rivaroxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDabigatran to Rivaroxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationApixaban to Edoxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationRivaroxaban to Apixaban1 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDabigatran to Edoxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationEdoxaban to Rivaroxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationRivaroxaban to Edoxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationEdoxaban to Apixaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationEdoxaban to Dabigatran0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationEdoxaban to Apixaban6 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDabigatran to Rivaroxaban3 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDabigatran to Apixaban9 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationDabigatran to Edoxaban2 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationRivaroxaban to Dabigatran0 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationRivaroxaban to Apixaban10 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationRivaroxaban to Edoxaban2 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationApixaban to Dabigatran5 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationApixaban to Rivaroxaban3 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationApixaban to Edoxaban4 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationEdoxaban to Dabigatran4 Switches to a new NOAC
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Switches According to Duration Since the First Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) InitiationEdoxaban to Rivaroxaban0 Switches to a new NOAC
Secondary

Total Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC Type

Total number of thromboembolic events, number of each type of thromboembolic events, number of stable and unstable anginas, and number of ST and non-ST myocardial infarction according to current non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) type is reported.

Time frame: At the single study visit (Day 1).

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who provided informed consent for this study and fulfilled all selection criteria. Only participants with non-missing outcomes were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of deep vein thrombosis0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.14
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of embolism systemic0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of haemorrhagic strokes0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.07
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions without ST segment elevation0.05 eventsStandard Deviation 0.24
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions with ST segment elevation0.04 eventsStandard Deviation 0.2
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)0.05 eventsStandard Deviation 0.22
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeTotal number of thromboembolic events0.29 eventsStandard Deviation 0.66
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of unstable anginas0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.07
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of stable anginas0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.14
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of ischemic strokes0.10 eventsStandard Deviation 0.3
Sex: MaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of pulmonary embolisms0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.07
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of ischemic strokes0.10 eventsStandard Deviation 0.3
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeTotal number of thromboembolic events0.54 eventsStandard Deviation 1.24
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)0.19 eventsStandard Deviation 0.63
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of haemorrhagic strokes0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of embolism systemic0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of deep vein thrombosis0.05 eventsStandard Deviation 0.37
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of pulmonary embolisms0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of stable anginas0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of unstable anginas0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions with ST segment elevation0.12 eventsStandard Deviation 0.37
Sex: FemaleTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions without ST segment elevation0.07 eventsStandard Deviation 0.3
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions with ST segment elevation0.07 eventsStandard Deviation 0.25
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of deep vein thrombosis0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.11
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of pulmonary embolisms0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.13
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeTotal number of thromboembolic events0.49 eventsStandard Deviation 1.19
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of stable anginas0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.15
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)0.06 eventsStandard Deviation 0.25
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of unstable anginas0.12 eventsStandard Deviation 0.74
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of haemorrhagic strokes0.01 eventsStandard Deviation 0.08
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions without ST segment elevation0.06 eventsStandard Deviation 0.29
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of embolism systemic0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
Age: ≥85 YearsTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of ischemic strokes0.13 eventsStandard Deviation 0.35
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions without ST segment elevation0.12 eventsStandard Deviation 0.33
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of ischemic strokes0.09 eventsStandard Deviation 0.34
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of deep vein thrombosis0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of stable anginas0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of myocardial infarctions with ST segment elevation0.05 eventsStandard Deviation 0.21
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of unstable anginas0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of pulmonary embolisms0.02 eventsStandard Deviation 0.12
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)0.03 eventsStandard Deviation 0.17
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeTotal number of thromboembolic events0.36 eventsStandard Deviation 0.69
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of embolism systemic0.03 eventsStandard Deviation 0.17
EdoxabanTotal Number of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Each Type of Thromboembolic Events, Number of Stable and Unstable Anginas, and Number of ST and Non-ST Myocardial Infarction According to Current NOAC TypeNumber of haemorrhagic strokes0.00 eventsStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026