Skip to content

A Prospective Randomised Multi-centre Trial Comparing cArdiac MRI Guided CRT Versus Conventional CRT Implantation in Patients With Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

A Prospective Randomised Multi-centre Trial Comparing cArdiac MRI Guided CRT Versus Conventional CRT Implantation in Patients With Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03992560
Acronym
TACTIC CRT
Enrollment
218
Registered
2019-06-20
Start date
2019-07-05
Completion date
2026-07-05
Last updated
2023-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether MRI guided CRT implantation (using Siemen's software prototype) is superior to standard treatment in terms of CRT response. Data will be collected at enrolment, implant, pre-discharge, 6 weeks and 6 months. The total duration of the investigation will be 6 months. The primary endpoint will be assessed by calculating the difference in the proportion of responders (\>15% reduction in end systolic volume derived from 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiogram at 6 months post CRT implant).

Interventions

DEVICEGuide CRT Software Prototype

The medical device in the trial is a software programme that allows image fusion of previously acquired MRI images with real-time X-Ray fluoroscopic images in the cardiac catheter laboratory. We are able to use the MRI information to assess the best location to place the left ventricular lead for a CRT device and then superimpose this location onto the real-time X-Ray fluoroscopic images during the left ventricular lead implantation

Sponsors

King's College London
CollaboratorOTHER
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18yrs of age * Standard indication for CRT-P or CRT-D according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Heart Rhythm (EHRA) guidelines.1 * Stable on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months * Ischaemic aetiology * Patients with atrial fibrillation can be included

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication to pacing /implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant * Requirement for endocardial pacing * Contraindication to gadolinium contrast enhanced cardiac Magnetic Resonance (MR) scanning * Significant claustrophobia * Significant renal impairment with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73m2 * Existing pacemaker or ICD system or extraction of a CRT system within the last 6 months * Participation in other studies with active treatment/ investigational arm * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 7 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
>15% reduction in end systolic volume6 months\>15% reduction in end systolic volume derived from 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiogram at 6 months post CRT implant

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5% absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction6 months5% absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction as derived from 2D echocardiogram
>10% reduction in end diastolic volume6 months\>10% reduction in end diastolic volume as derived from 2D echocardiogram

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026