Event-Related Potentials, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Treatment Resistant Depression
Conditions
Brief summary
Study of individualized accurate targeting rTMS intervention on motivational anhedonia of treatment resistant depression and brain network mechanism
Detailed description
Before treatment, Magnetic resonance images of each participant were acquired from scanner of the same type (3.0T, Discovery GE750w). As the key role of nucleus accumbens (NACC, -7.5, 5.5, 9) in anhedonia, the accurate target of left dlPFC was defined as the strongest functional connectivity with NACC. Each treatment session was under neuronavigation with a Visor neuronavigation system (ANT Neuro, Enschede, Netherlands) for coil positioning. All patients underwent a medical evaluation that included physical examination and routine laboratory studies before and after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to real group or sham group by coin toss. A threshold of 3 points on the Hamilton Depression scale has been specified by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to determine a clinically meaningful difference between active pharmacotherapy and placebo. We plan to enroll minimum total sample size of 29 participants in real and sham group respectively according to the Power and Sample Size program. The decision to enroll a patient was always made prior to randomization. Patients were studied using a double-blind design. The participants, clinical raters, and all personnel responsible for the clinical care of the patient remained masked to the allocated condition and allocation parameters. Only the rTMS administrators had access to the randomization list. They had minimal contact with the patients, and no role in assessing depression. Each patient would be treated for continuous 15 days by rTMS. Before the rTMS treatment, depression symptom of each participant was assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Self-Rating Scale. The anhedonia severity was evaluated by The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale, the Self-Report Apathy Evaluation Scale, Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale, the Motivation and Pleasure Scale. The neuroimaging data was collected using functional magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities, resting electroencephalography, and event-related potentials during monetary incentive delay task, and Iowa-gambling test. The participants had also received a battery measure of neuropsychological tests (standardized tests to investigate their cognitive problems). After the last treatment, the same scales and neuroimaging scan were used again to assess the treatment effect of the rTMS and the underlying brain mechanism. Each participant was interviewed in detail about the adverse event of the rTMS intervention during the past 15 days. A month after the last treatment, each participant received follow-up visit by telephone to access the persistent effect of the intervention. Every participant should take part in the study in voluntary and sign an informed consent form before the study.
Interventions
DEVICErepeated transcranial magnetic stimulation with real coil
repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation with real coil is a noninvasive technique to activate and modify the activity of the neurons
DEVICErepeated transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham coil
repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham coil is a placebo
Sponsors
Anhui Medical University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Meet criteria of depression assessed by at least two psychiatrists according to the five version of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 2. The score of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-24 was larger than 18. 3. The score of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was larger than 15. 4. Psychotropic medication was at steady dosages for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry and for the duration of the trial. 5. Age was between 18 to 60 year old. 6. The intelligence quotient score was larger than 85. 7. The education duration was at least 6 years. 8. The vision or corrected vision was normal. 9. Right handedness. 10. No treatment of rTMS, transcranial direct current stimulation or electroconvulsive therapy before.
Exclusion criteria
1. History of significant head trauma or neurological disorders. 2. Alcohol or drug abuse. 3. Focal brain lesions. 4. History of seizure. 5. First degree relative with epilepsy, significant neurological illness or head trauma, endocrine disease. 6. Significant unstable medical condition. 7. Recent aggression or other forms of behavioral dyscontrol. 8. Left-handedness. 9. Pregnancy. 10. Current alcohol or drug abuse 11. Inability to provide informed consent. 12. Patients with contraindications or factors affecting imaging quality, such as pacemakers, cochlear implants, or hearts Cerebrovascular metal stent, and metal denture.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Scale | baseline;15 day post-treatment | The participants' depression symptom assessed by the Hamilton Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Self-Rating Scale change from baseline after the treatment. |
| Change from baseline in Motivation and Pleasure Scale | baseline;15 day post-treatment | The severity of participants' anhedonia assessed by the Motivation and Pleasure Scale change from baseline after the treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The change from baseline in behavioral results of Monetary Incentive Delay task | baseline; 15 day post-treatment change from baseline after the treatment. | The motivational anhedonia assessed by accuracy and response time in Monetary Incentive Delay task |
| The change from baseline in event-related brain potentials during the monetary incentive delay task | baseline; 15 day post-treatment | The amplitudes of brain potentials of contingent negative variation, P3 and Feed-back negativity assessed by event-related brain potentials methods change from baseline after the treatment. |
| The change from baseline in neuroimaging results of functional magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities | baseline; 15 day post-treatment | The activation of nucleus accumbens, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex and the functional connection these brain area assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging scan in multimodalities change from baseline after the treatment. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactFengqiong Yu, MD
Backup ContactTingting Chen, Master
Outcome results
None listed