Respiratory Failure With Hypercapnia
Conditions
Brief summary
Around 20% of the patients requiring hospitalization for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) develop hypercapnia, which is associated with an increased risk of death. Once Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) has been initiated, a reduction in Respiratory Rate (RR) and improvement in pH within 4 h predicts NIV success. If pH \<7.25 and RR \>35 breath per minutes persist, NIV failure is likely. Worsening acidosis, after initial improvement with NIV, is also associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, it has been shown that delaying intubation in patients at high risk for NIV failure has a negative impact on patient survival. Hence, assessing the risk of NIV failure is extremely important. NIV has some limitations: a) intolerance, discomfort and claustrophobia requiring frequent interruptions; b) poor patient-ventilator synchrony, especially in presence of air leaks or high ventilatory requirements. Since removing carbon dioxide by means of an artificial lung reduces the minute ventilation required to maintain an acceptable arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), the investigators hypothesize that applying Extra-Corporeal CO2 Removal (ECCO2R) in high-risk AECOPD patients may reduce the incidence of NIV failure and improve patient-ventilator interaction. After the beginning of ECCO2R, NIV could be gradually replaced by High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy (HFNCOT), potentially reducing the risk of ventilator induced lung injury, improving patient's comfort and probably allowing the adoption of a more physiologically noisy pattern of spontaneous breathing.
Interventions
PROCEDUREHFNCOT+ECCO2R
NIV will be discontinued, the ECCO2R setting will be unchanged (both sweep gas flow and blood flow through the artificial lung) and HFNCOT will be started, titrating the fraction of inspired Oxygen (FiO2) to obtain an oxygen saturation at periphery (SpO2) 88-92%; HFNCOT start temperature will be 31°C, the initial flow rate will be 60 L/min.
Sponsors
Niguarda Hospital
San Gerardo Hospital
Ospedale San Paolo
Policlinico Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patients admitted to Emergency or Pulmonology Department, with history of COPD (pulmonary function test available, any Global Obstructive Lung Disease -GOLD- stage), treated with NIV for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to AECOPD defined by: * pH \<7.35 + PaCO2 \>45 mmHg (acute hypercapnic respiratory failure) or pH \<7.35 + PaCO2 \> 20% of baseline value (acute on chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure) * Acute worsening of respiratory symptoms that results in additional therapy * Respiratory failure not fully explainable with cardiac failure and at high risk for NIV failure, defined by: * No improvement or worsening of respiratory acidosis (pH \<7.35 and PaCO2 \>45 mmHg) after 2 hours of NIV + one of the following: RR ≥30 bpm; use of accessory respiratory muscle or paradoxical breathing (Combination criteria for NIV failure) or * Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 11 after 2 hours of NIV (Single criteria for NIV failure) or * Inability to fit mask (facial deformity/intervention/burns) or marked intolerance to interface because of patient's agitation (Single Criteria for NIV failure)
Exclusion criteria
* Age \>80 years old * Contraindications to anticoagulation (any of the following: platelet count \<30.000/mm3; activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) \>1,5; stroke or severe head trauma or intracranial arteriovenous malformation or cerebral aneurysm in the previous 3 months; central nervous system mass lesion; history of congenital bleeding diatheses; gastro-intestinal bleeding in the previous 6 weeks; gastro-esophageal varices) * Cirrhosis * PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 150 mmHg * Hemodynamic instability (80-90 mmHg increase or 30-40 mmHg decrease systolic arterial pressure compared to baseline value or need of vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure higher than 85 mmHg or electrocardiogram evidence of ischemia/arrhythmias) * Body Mass Index ≥37 * Impending respiratory arrest * Catheter access to femoral vein or jugular vein impossible * Patient moribund, decision to limit therapeutic interventions * Opposition to participate obtained from the patient or their legally acceptable representative
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of partecipants failing HFNCOT+ECCO2R treatment with need of restoring NIV or need of invasive mechanical ventilation | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | ECCO2R+HFNCOT failure criteria are defined by at least two of the following after at least 1 hour of treatment 1. Respiratory acidosis (pH \<7.35) 2. RR ≥ 30 bpm 3. Development of progressive hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 \< 150) 4. Paradoxical breathing |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients treated with ECCO2R reporting one or more side effects due to ECCO2R | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | 1. Bleeding (any bleeding event requiring the administration of 1 U of packed red cells) 2. Vein perforation at cannula insertion 3. Hemodynamic instability (80-90 mmHg increase or 30-40 mmHg decrease systolic arterial pressure compared to baseline value or need of vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure higher than 85 mmHg or electrocardiogram evidence of ischemia/arrhythmias) 4. Pneumothorax 5. Ischemic bowel 6. Acute kidney failure 7. Neurological complications (occurrence, after initiation of ECCO2R, of ischemic/hemorrhagic ictus or clinical seizure or cerebral oedema) 8. Metabolic complications (occurrence, after initiation of ECCO2R of hyperbilirubinemia or glucose≥240 mg/dL) 9. Thromboembolic complications (occurrence, after initiation of ECCO2R, of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) |
| Variation of pulmonary arterial pressure before and after ECCO2R treatment either in association with NIV or HNFCOT | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Echocardiographic measurement |
| Variation of tricuspid annluar plane systolic excursion before and after ECCO2R treatment either in association with NIV or HNFCOT | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Echocardiographic measurement |
| Variation of respiratory mechanic during ECCO2R+NIV | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of Respiratory Rate (breaths per minute) |
| Variation of dyspnea during ECCO2R+NIV | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of dyspnea through Borg dyspnea scale. (ranging from a minimum of 0 point, indicating no shortness of breath, to a maximum of 10 points, indicating maximum shortness of breath) |
| Variation of comfort during ECCO2R+NIV | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of comfort through Visual Analogic Scale for comfort, ranging from a minimum of 0 point, indicating no comfort, to a maximun of 10 point, indicating maximum comfort |
| Number of partecipants failing NIV+ECCO2R treatment with need of invasive mechanical ventilation | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | NIV+ECCO2R failure is defined by two of the following occurring for at least 2 hours: 1. No improvement or worsening of respiratory acidosis (pH \<7.35) 2. RR ≥30 bpm 3. Development of progressive hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ≤150) |
| Variation of dyspnea during ECCO2R+HFNCOT | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of dyspnea through Borg dyspnea scale, ranging from a minimum of 0 point, indicating no shortness of breath, to a maximum of 10 points, indicating maximum shortness of breath |
| Variation of comfort during ECCO2R+HFNCOT | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of comfort through Visual Analogic Scale for comfort, ranging from a minimum of 0 point, indicating no comfort, to a maximun of 10 point, indicating maximum comfort |
| Variation of breathing pattern during ECCO2R+NIV | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of expiratory tidal volume, expressed in mL |
| Variation of acid-base balance during ECCO2R+NIV | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | emogasanalysis |
| Variation of acid-base balance during ECCO2R+HFNCOT | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | emogasanalysis |
| Variation of respiratory mechanic during ECCO2R+HFNCOT | Through study completion, an average of 2 years | Measurement of Respiratory Rate (breaths per minute) |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactGiacomo Grasselli, Professor
Outcome results
None listed