Skip to content

Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing Versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy.

Effect of Laparoscopic Suturing Versus Bipolar Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03989856
Acronym
Eolsb
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-06-18
Start date
2019-03-15
Completion date
2019-09-20
Last updated
2019-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovary Injury

Brief summary

In women undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy which is less harmfull on the ovarian reserve (electrocoagulation or suturing).

Detailed description

The aim of the present study was to determine which hemostatic procedure (hemostatic suture or electrocautery) may be less harmful after laparoscopic cystectomy, based on the longterm status of the ovarian reserve.

Interventions

DEVICE2-0 polyglican absorbable sutures

The sutures will be performed with intracorporeal knots using 2-0 polyglican absorbable sutures (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc., New Jersey, USA). Suture is performed using needle holders for the closure of ovarian parenchyma and controlling bleeding. Bleeding from ovarian hilus will only resolve by suturing.

DEVICEDiathermy

bipolar coagulation technique will be used to control significant bleeding (40 W current; Richard Wolf, Germany). I

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Allocation and concealment will be done by sequentially sealed opaque envelopes. 60 envelopes will be numbered serially from 1 to 60, 30 envelopes will contain the letter c and the other 30 will contain the letter S. In each envelope, the corresponding letter which donates the allocated group will be put according to the randomization table and them all envelopes will be closed and put in one box. When the first patient arrives, the first envelope will be opened and the patient will be allocated according to the letter inside.

Intervention model description

The study population comprises females in childbearing period underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Faculty of medicine.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18- 45. 2. Regular menstrual cycle. 3. Unilateral ovarian cyst clinical & us finding as endometriotic cyst. 4. C/O of pelvic pain. 5. No medications (oral pills & hormonal drugs) in the past 3 monthes before enrollement. 6. No evidence of endocrine disorders (DM, Thyroid dysfunction,hyper prolactenemia, congenital adrenal hyperplesia, cushing's syndrome or adrenal insufficiency) 7. No previous adnexial surgery. 8. Pathology diagnosis of excised ovarian tissue (endometriotic cyst) 9. Appropriate medical condition for laparoscopic surgery. 10. Completely understand the process of the study with written consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. PCO according to Rotterdam criteria. 2. Pathological diagnosis of excised ovarian tissue as non endometriotic cyst. 3. Previous ovarian surgery. 4. Suspected ovarian malignancy. 5. Patient whose histopathology showed benign cyst apart from endometrioma. 6. Irregular menstrual cycles. 7. Post menopausal status. 8. Bilateral ovarian cyst. 9. AMH \< 0.5 ng/ml. 10. Premature ovarian failure in family.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ovarian reserve3 monthsBy measuring Anti-mullerian hormone

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Abd elfatah el senity, Lecturer
M.elsenity@yahoo.com+201226573332
Backup ContactAhmad Yousef riad, M.B.B.C.H
ahmedriadaboelnaga90@gmail.com+201093151434

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026