Skip to content

Efficacy of High Density Voltage and Fractionation Map Guided Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Efficacy of High Density Voltage and Fractionation Map Guided Ablation Compared to Anatomy-based Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03989726
Acronym
INVENTION
Enrollment
160
Registered
2019-06-18
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2021-05-31
Last updated
2019-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of high density voltage and fractionation map guided ablation compared to anatomy-based circumferential pulmonary vein Isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Detailed description

In this study, a test group includes those who undergoing atrial fibrillation(AF) ablation guided by high density voltage and fractionation map. A control group will be chosen from database of patients who underwent AF ablation between 2018-2019. A control group includes the same number of consecutive patients who underwent anatomy-based circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAF ablation

AF ablation includes pulmonary vein isolation and/or voltage and fractionation guided ablation

Sponsors

Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Age over 20 years old and under 80 years old 2. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation 3. Patients having AF even after receiving continued treatment with at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug for more than 6 weeks 4. Patients who can understand the information sheet and consent form on the need and procedure of catheter ablation and submitted them 5. Patients who are available of follow-up at least for more than three months after catheter ablation

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients unsuitable for catheter ablation because the size of left atrium is over 6.0 cm 2. Patients unsuitable for catheter ablation due to previous history of pulmonary surgery or structural heat disease. 3. Patients who cannot receive standard treatments such as anticoagulation therapy which need to be continuously performed prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation 4. Patients in the subject group vulnerable to clinical study 5. Patients who had undergone a prior catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Free from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months12 monthsFreedom from any atrial arrhythmia lasting longer than 30 seconds during 1 year follow-up after single ablation with or without the use of antiarrhythmic medications with the exclusion of the 3-month blanking period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute AF termination rate during the procedureDuring the procedureAcute AF termination rate during the procedure
Complication rate12 monthsCompare complication rate between two groups
Total procedure time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time12 monthsTotal procedure time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time between two groups

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactHyoung-Seob Park, MD
drparkgyver@gmail.com+82-53-258-7725

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026