Skip to content

Real-time Location System Feasibility Study

Real-time Location System Feasibility Study Part 2

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03988751
Enrollment
22
Registered
2019-06-17
Start date
2019-06-06
Completion date
2022-08-19
Last updated
2024-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mobility, Surgery

Brief summary

The proposed study will investigate the feasibility of using the Wake Forest Real-time Location System (RTLS) in monitoring patient movement during their in-hospital postoperative recovery. The study will involve patients who have undergone surgery requiring inpatient admission to the surgical ward. Actual patient movement will be monitored during their postoperative recovery and compared with data recorded by the Wake Forest location system. In this small pilot study, a subgroup of participants will be randomized to two cohorts, continuous walking and interval walking. Tolerability of the varied walking intensity will be measured.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAmbulation

Variation in ambulatory intensity.

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients between the ages of 18 and 90. * Admitted to the Surgical Ward. * Recovering from surgery. * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent document. * Ability to understand and complete the study survey instruments in English.

Exclusion criteria

* Non-surgical patient. * Emergency surgical procedure. * Anticipated discharge less than 24 hour. * Unable to ambulate or ambulation not permitted by treating provider. * Unable to understand and complete the study survey instruments in English. * Post-operative complications that in the opinion of the study investigator would impair the ability of the patient to adhere to the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Characterize Number of Participants Who Tolerate Continuous vs Interval 40m Walk.1 dayCharacterize number of participants who tolerate continuous vs interval 40m walk by evaluation of adverse events and change in vital signs.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Continuous Ambulation
The subject will walk a total distance of 40 meters. Study team members will walk, support, and coach the subject to walk as slow as he/she wants.
10
Interval Ambulation
The subject will walk a total distance of 40 meters. This distance will be divided into four intervals of 10 meters to equal the same measured distance as the continuous group. The subject will receive two minutes of rest between each interval and will be supported and coached to walk as fast as they can.
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterval AmbulationTotalContinuous Ambulation
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Age, Continuous64 years64 years65 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants17 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants10 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Characterize Number of Participants Who Tolerate Continuous vs Interval 40m Walk.

Characterize number of participants who tolerate continuous vs interval 40m walk by evaluation of adverse events and change in vital signs.

Time frame: 1 day

Population: Number of participants who completed 40 meter ambulation without adverse event or significant change in vital signs

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Continuous AmbulationCharacterize Number of Participants Who Tolerate Continuous vs Interval 40m Walk.10 Participants
Interval AmbulationCharacterize Number of Participants Who Tolerate Continuous vs Interval 40m Walk.10 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026