Skip to content

Enhanced Consent and Preparedness for Surgery Trial

Enhanced Consent and Preparedness for Surgery (ECAPS) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03988569
Acronym
ECAPS
Enrollment
158
Registered
2019-06-17
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2024-02-22
Last updated
2024-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence

Brief summary

To develop an audiovisual decision aid (AVDA) to improve the informed consent process. The investigators aim to examine the impact of a comprehensible AVDA that is written below the 8th grade reading level. The AVDA would be used for surgical consent compared to traditional verbal consent. Additionally, the investigators plan to determine whether this effect varies across the measured levels of health literacy of our patients.

Detailed description

To address the limitations of consent, interventions have been developed to improve the quality of information provided to patients including written pamphlets, videos, and websites. Such interventions have been called decision aids. Decision aids may promote informed consent through greater knowledge and consistency of personal values or attitudes with an enacted choice. Providing adequate information increases satisfaction, more rapid symptom resolution, reduced emotional distress, reduced use of analgesia, and possibly shorter hospital admissions. Cochrane reviews have established that audiovisual decision aids enhance informed surgical consent, yet little data exists about the benefits of such aids in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS)4.

Interventions

OTHERaudiovisual decision aid

Will view AVDA and then have opportunity for questions with physician before signing consent forms

Sponsors

Loyola University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

the proposed study is to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in surgical preparedness between women who receive a standard surgical consent for pelvic reconstructive surgery (control) and those who receive a standard surgical consent that is enhanced with an audiovisual decision aid (treatment) for the same surgery. Equivalently, the null hypothesis is that the odds ratio is 1.00.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients electing for surgical intervention of pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, urgency urinary incontinence by treating physicians in the Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients ≤ 18 years old * Non-English speaking patients * Patients with video or audio impairments who are unable to view the AVDA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Preparedness for surgeryDay 0To compare the odds of higher agreement between patients assigned to receive enhanced audiovisual aided consent versus standard consent on the question Overall, I feel prepared for my upcoming surgery. This item is asked on day of consent and patients respond using a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026