Skip to content

Rectal Gas Removal Through Small Catheter Placement Prior to MRI of the Prostate

Rectal Gas Removal Through Small Catheter Placement Prior to MRI of the Prostate: Assessment of the Impact on Diffusion Weighted Images Artifacts and Diagnostic Accuracy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03987737
Acronym
GAS
Enrollment
46
Registered
2019-06-17
Start date
2019-08-31
Completion date
2020-10-31
Last updated
2019-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

Prostatic neoplasm, Prostate, bp MRI of the prostate, small rectal catheter placement

Brief summary

The presence of rectal gas can cause distortion at air-tissue interfaces on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) of prostate MRI and reduce image quality due to these susceptibility artifacts. Small catheter placement in the rectum before MRI is one of the ways that is advocated in PI-RADS v2 guidelines to reduce rectal gas. The goal of this study is to prospectively evaluate the effect of small catheter placement on artifacts on diffusion weighted images and to see whether it improves diagnostic accuracy.

Detailed description

The value of MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer has already been shown in many studies \[1\]. With MRI widely available and general accepted by urologists and radiologist for prostate imaging, a good execution and high quality of the images have become crucial. Recently Caglic et al published an article about optimizing prostate mpMRI \[2\]. One of the factors that influences image quality is rectal loading and bowel movement. The prostate is located anterior in the immediate vicinity of the rectum, so prostatic MRI is prone to artifacts caused by bowel movements and to susceptibility artifacts at the air-tissue interface \[3\]. Rectal movements are correlated to the degree of rectal distension and result in significant displacement of the prostate gland \[4\]. Rectal distension has a negative impact on the quality of both T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion weighted images (DWI) \[5\], which are the two most important sequences in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. A study by Lim et al \[6\] showed a significant correlation between the amount of stool in the rectum and the severity of motion artifacts, however reducing the amount of stool with an enema did not improve the quality of T2W, DWI or dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images compared to the non-enema group. As the authors have declared, this could be due to the fact that only a minority of patients in the non-enema group had moderate or large amounts of stool (15.6%). This study by Lim et al also showed that the amount of rectal gas did not correlate with the severity of distortion artifacts on diffusion images, which could mean that even a small amount of gas could already cause substantial (susceptibility) artifacts on DWI. A larger study by Griethuysen et al \[7\] showed that a micro-enema shortly before the examination reduces both the incidence and the severity of gas-induced artifacts. So, moving gas appears to be the main concern and preparation is recommended. There is no evidence that one rectal emptying strategy is better than another \[8\]. In PI-RADS v2, different approaches are suggested, the aforementioned micro-enema, performing the MRI exam with patient in the prone position or to decompress the rectum using a small catheter \[9\]. This study aims to assess the efficacy of small catheter placement just before the MRI examination in reducing susceptibility on diffusion weighted images.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsmall urinary catheter placement in the rectum

The MRI technician will place a small urinary catheter in the rectum prior to MRI of the prostate to evacuate excessive gasses. This catheter will stay in the rectum during the whole MRI examination.

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, single center, comparative study between two rectal emptying strategies. Patients will be randomized into one of two arms. In both arms the subjects will be asked to evacuate the rectum as much as possible prior to the MRI exam. In the study arm, a small catheter will be placed in the rectum by the MRI technician and the examination will be executed with the small catheter in situ. In the control arm, subjects will be scanned immediately after rectal evacuation on the toilet. If the DWI sequence is non-interpretable due to susceptibility artefacts, excessive air will be removed with small catheter placement eventually and the scan will be repeated.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* willing to participate in the study by giving written informed consent. * male subjects aged between 45 to 80 years. * scheduled for a prostate MRI due to clinical suspicion of prostatic carcinoma (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in blood and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)), staging, follow-up or active surveillance. * good health condition based on medical history, physical examination and vital sign measurements.

Exclusion criteria

* has a contra-indication for MRI (claustrophobia, non-compatible metallic implants). * has a prior history of hip prosthesis. * has any condition, physical, mental, familial or sociological, that could impede compliance with the study protocol and further follow-up. This is not an absolute contra-indication, but should be discussed with patient prior to registration in the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
degree of distortion of the prostate on AP direction on DWI compared to T2W images in mm1 weekThe difference in diameter in anterio-posterior direction between axial DWI and the corresponding T2W images

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of clinically significant cancers detected more due to improved quality of imageswithin 1 yearcompared to control group, and with biopsy/pathological specimen as reference
Number of rescans due to insufficient image quality after small catheter placementwithin 1 yearcompared to control group

Contacts

Primary ContactCindy Mai, MD
cindy.mai@uzleuven.be003216345032
Backup ContactHilde Vandenhout
hilde.vandenhout@uzleuven.be003216343636

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026