Skip to content

A Phase 3 Study to Confirm the Efficacy and Safety of Linzagolix to Treat Endometriosis-associated Pain

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Linzagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-associated Pain.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03986944
Enrollment
85
Registered
2019-06-14
Start date
2019-05-23
Completion date
2021-02-16
Last updated
2025-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Keywords

Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia, Dyschezia, Non-menstrual pelvic pain

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of linzagolix administered orally once daily for 3 months at a dose of 75 mg alone or of 200 mg in combination with add-back hormone replacement therapy (ABT: estradiol (E2) 1 mg / norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg) versus placebo, in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (EAP).

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of linzagolix administered orally once daily at doses of 75 mg alone and 200 mg in combination with low dose ABT (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg) versus placebo in the management of moderate to severe EAP in 450 women. Eligible subjects who have completed the 6-month treatment period may enter a separate extension study for 6 additional months of active treatment (no placebo control). Subjects who do not continue in the extension study will enter a 6 month treatment-free follow-up phase.

Interventions

For oral administration once daily

For oral administration once daily

For oral administration once daily

For oral administration once daily

For oral administration once daily

For oral administration once daily

Sponsors

Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: The subject must have: * Her most recent surgical and - if available - histological diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis up to 10 years before screening. * Moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain during the screening period. * Regular menstrual cycles. * BMI ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit. Key

Exclusion criteria

The subject will be excluded if she: * Is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the treatment period of the study. * Is less than 6 months postpartum or 3 months postabortion/ miscarriage at the time of entry into the screening period. * Has had a surgical history of any major abdominal surgery within 6 months or any interventional surgery for endometriosis performed within a period of 2 months before screening. * Did not respond to prior treatment with GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis. * Has a history of, or known, osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease. * Has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy which would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis-associated pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DysmenorrheaBaseline to Month 3Change at Month 3 from baseline in the mean daily assessment of dysmenorrhea (DYS) measured on a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using an electronicdiary * The 4-point VRS scale for DYS ranges from 0 to 3 (0: No pain; 1: Mild pain; 2: Moderate pain; 3: Severe pain). * A negative change in scores would be indicative of an improvement in the pain of DYS.
Non-menstrual Pelvic PainBaseline to Month 3Change at Month 3 from baseline in the mean daily assessment of non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) measured on a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using anelectronic diary * The 4-point VRS scale for NMPP ranges from 0 to 3 (0: No pain; 1: Mild pain; 2: Moderate pain; 3: Severe pain). * A negative change in scores would be indicative of an improvement in the NMPP.

Countries

Canada, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of the 492 subjects screened, 85 were randomized. Between randomization and Day 1 (i.e., first day of dosing), 1 subject in the placebo group discontinued due to protocol deviation. Thus, 84 randomized subjects were treated and comprised the Safety Analysis Set.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis were enrolled in a 1:1:1 ratio in one of three treatment groups: LGX 75 mg, LGX 200 mg+ABT or Placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LGX 75 mg
One Linzagolix 75 mg tablet, one Linzagolix 200 mg matching placebo tablet and one ABT matching placebo capsule were administered once daily orally for 6 months.
28
LGX 200 mg+ABT
One Linzagolix 200 mg tablet and one Linzagolix 75 mg matching placebo tablet and ABT capsules (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) were administered once daily orally for 6 months.
29
Placebo
One Linzagolix 75 mg matching placebo tablet one Linzagolix 200 mg matching placebo tablet and ABT matching placebo capsule were administered once daily orally for 6 months.
27
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event123
Overall StudyDiscontinuation after moving to Follow-up Period [Study termination per Sponsor]100
Overall StudyDiscontinuation after moving to Follow-up Period [Subject's Request (Family Issue)]010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation011
Overall StudyStudy termination101010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject355

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLGX 75 mgLGX 200 mg+ABTPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants29 Participants27 Participants84 Participants
Age, Continuous32.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Age, Customized32.5 years34.0 years31.0 years33.0 years
BMI29.08 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
28.54 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.48
26.61 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.84
28.10 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants12 Participants9 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants17 Participants18 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants27 Participants20 Participants69 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 participants2 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
4 participants2 participants0 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants25 participants28 participants76 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants29 Participants27 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Weight78.130 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.904
76.540 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.207
71.280 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.05
75.379 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.885

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 290 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 2816 / 2912 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 290 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Dysmenorrhea

Change at Month 3 from baseline in the mean daily assessment of dysmenorrhea (DYS) measured on a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using an electronicdiary * The 4-point VRS scale for DYS ranges from 0 to 3 (0: No pain; 1: Mild pain; 2: Moderate pain; 3: Severe pain). * A negative change in scores would be indicative of an improvement in the pain of DYS.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 3

Population: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was terminated early and only 85 out of the planned 450 subjects were randomized. As there were insufficient number of treated subjects at study termination, no analyses of efficacy were conducted. This time, we calculated mean±SD from only 6 subjects with DYS \& NMPP data on both D1 \& M3 and entered them as efficacy results in this table. There were no other subjects besides these 6 who had both data at baseline and another time point (M3, M6, M9 or M12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LGX 75 mgDysmenorrhea-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
LGX 200 mg+ABTDysmenorrhea0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboDysmenorrhea0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Primary

Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain

Change at Month 3 from baseline in the mean daily assessment of non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) measured on a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using anelectronic diary * The 4-point VRS scale for NMPP ranges from 0 to 3 (0: No pain; 1: Mild pain; 2: Moderate pain; 3: Severe pain). * A negative change in scores would be indicative of an improvement in the NMPP.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 3

Population: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was terminated early and only 85 out of the planned 450 subjects were randomized. As there were insufficient number of treated subjects at study termination, no analyses of efficacy were conducted. This time, we calculated mean±SD from only 6 subjects with DYS \& NMPP data on both D1 \& M3 and entered them as efficacy results in this table. There were no other subjects besides these 6 who had both data at baseline and another time point (M3, M6, M9 or M12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LGX 75 mgNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
LGX 200 mg+ABTNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026