Skip to content

Bursa Augmentation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Biological Augmentation With Subacromial Bursa in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair - Postoperative Findings Using Doppler Ultrasonography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03986749
Acronym
ARCR-Bursa
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-06-14
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2023-08-22
Last updated
2024-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tear or Rupture, Not Specified as Traumatic

Keywords

arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, bursa augmentation, neovascularization, Doppler ultrasonography

Brief summary

The aim of this first study is to investigate in a case series through sequential sonographic imaging, using Doppler ultrasonography, the postoperative morphology, especially vascularity and findings of neovascularity, after bursa augmentation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Detailed description

The outcome of rotator cuff (RC) reconstruction with and without bursa augmentation, considering also the inflammatory status of the bursa, will be systematically investigated for the first time. The influencing role of the inflammatory status of the bursa, of the RC tendon and the synovial membrane at the time of the operation on the tendinous healing rate, the patient-relevant outcome factors and the revision rate will be assessed. In a further approach, basic knowledge about the role of bursa inflammation and its influence in the development and regeneration of tendon pathologies shall be gained. The findings of the whole project could lead to improve tendon healing in the reconstruction of the rotator cuff, taking advantage of augmentation potential of the subacromial bursa.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDoppler ultrasonography after bursa augmentation

Dynamic ultrasound examination with Grading of blood vessels using the modified Ohberg Score in the longitudinal scan in dynamic ultrasound of the rotator cuff tendon - primary to surgery and 3 weeks later.

Sponsors

Schulthess Klinik
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective observational case-series

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient aged 18 years and older * Patient with C-shaped posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (SSP / ± ISP, ± SCP Tear Lafosse ≤ 1 (SCP no repair, only debridement)) * Retraction ≤ 2 according to Patte * Fatty infiltration ≤ 2 according to Goutallier * Eligible for arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair in Suture Bridge technique. * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Legal incompetence * Last subacromial cortisone infiltration ≤ 6 months * Systemic rheumatologic-inflammatory disease * Diabetes Mellitus * Smoker

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic ultrasound examination with grading of blood vessels3 monthsusing the modified Ohberg Score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tendon condition6 monthsThickness of the repaired tendons (mm)
Range of motion6 monthsElevation (flexion), abduction, external rotation by 0° abduction, external-internal rotation by 90° abduction
Shoulder muscle strength6 monthsShoulder strength in 90° Abduction (kg) measured using a spring balance
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)6 monthsPatient-reported Oxford Shoulder Score from 0 (worse) to 48 (best)
Tendon integrity6 monthsintact / partially ruptured / ruptured
Constant Murley score (CMS)6 monthsConstant Murley functional score from 0 (worse) to 100 (best)
Level of satisfaction6 monthsLevel of satisfaction using Number Rating Scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (highly satisfied)
EQ-5D utilities6 monthsPatient-reported Quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L) as Utility index from 0 (worse) to 1 (best health)
Adverse events6 monthsNumber of patients with adverse events
Subjective shoulder value (SSV)6 monthsPatient-reported Subjective shoulder value from 0 (worse) to 100% (best)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026