Skip to content

Pain Response to Cannabidiol in Induced Acute Nociceptive Pain, Allodynia and Hyperalgesia By Using a Model Mimicking Acute Pain in Healthy Adults

Pain Response to Cannabidiol in Induced Acute Nociceptive Pain, Allodynia and Hyperalgesia By Using a Model Mimicking Acute Pain in Healthy Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03985995
Acronym
CANAB I
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-06-14
Start date
2019-09-16
Completion date
2019-12-23
Last updated
2020-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allodynia, Hyperalgesia, Pain Sensation

Keywords

Cannabidiol (CBD)

Brief summary

This study is to investigate the effect of CBD on acute pain in healthy volunteers in a well-established acute pain model.

Detailed description

There are no studies investigating Cannabidiol (CBD) in an acute pain model in human beings. This is however of great clinical value because: 1. Patients are often treated insufficiently with the commonly used analgesics in acute pain therapy or the available selection of analgesics is limited by their contraindications and side-effects. 2. CBD could be an option to optimize pain therapy if the pain relief is not satisfactory. 3. CBD in contrast to ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) has only few side effects and due to a possible dose reduction of other analgesics patients might benefit from a better side-effect profile. This study is to investigate the effect of CBD on acute pain in healthy volunteers in a well-established acute pain model.

Interventions

DRUGCBD 800 mg p.o

cannabidiol solution 100 mg/ml 8 ml in single-dose containers for per os administration. After a washout period of at least two weeks, the treatment group will be receiving a single-dose of the placebo solution 8 ml as a second intervention.

DRUGPlacebo p.o

single dose of oral placebo solution 8 ml matched to the IMP. After a washout period of at least two weeks, the control intervention group will be receiving the cannabidiol solution 100 mg/ml 8 ml as a second intervention.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy adults * BMI between 18.5 until 25 kg/m2 * Able to understand the study and the NRS scale * Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Regular consumption of cannabinoids or other drugs / substances * Regular intake of medications potentially interfering with pain sensation (analgesics, antihistamines, calcium and potassium channel blockers, serotonin / noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, corticosteroids) * Neuropathy * Chronic pain * Neuromuscular disease * Psychiatric disease * Known or suspected kidney or liver disease * Pregnancy/ Lactation * Allergy / hypersensitivity to cannabidiol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain (numeric rating scale (NRS): 0 = no pain and 10 = maximum tolerable pain)pain will be assessed every 10 minutes using the NRS from minute 70 to 130Change in pain for 60 min (from minute 70 to 130) after inducing defined pain in an experimental setting (Koppert model). 2 microdialysis catheters are inserted into intradermal surface of forearm and attached to a constant current stimulator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in area of hyperalgesia (cm)from minute 70 to 130Change in area of hyperalgesia (from minute 70 to 130) after inducing a defined pain in an experimental setting (Koppert model). Immediately after every pain rating the area of pinprick hyperalgesia is determined using a 256 MilliNewton (mN) von Frey Filament. The von Frey Filament will be moved towards the site of stimulation in 0.5 cm increments until the subject reports increased pain sensations from the von Frey filament (hyperalgesia). To create an area from these linear measurements, the assumption is made, that this field has the shape of an ellipse. The area is calculated using the formula 1/4πD·d.
Change in area of allodynia (cm)from minute 70 to 130Change in area of allodynia (from minute 70 to 130) after inducing a defined pain in an experimental setting (Koppert model). Immediately after every pain rating the area of allodynia is determined using a dry cotton swab. The Cotton swab will be moved towards the site of stimulation in 0.5 cm increments until the subject reports an unpleasant rougher sensation from the cotton swab (allodynia). To create an area from these linear measurements, the assumption is made, that this field has the shape of an ellipse. The area is calculated using the formula 1/4πD·d.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026