Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Behavioral Symptoms
Conditions
Brief summary
A comparative effectiveness study using an individual-level randomized design along with a pragmatic, mixed-methods approach to compare two strategies (e.g. in-person supported care, technology-supported care) all of which include evidence-based components for delivering IBD and BH care. Quantitative (e.g. self-report, electronic health record, process) and qualitative (e.g., interviews) data will be collected across multiple time points during the study period.
Detailed description
The investigators propose to conduct a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of two evidence-based, patient-centered approaches implemented within an existing Specialty Medical Home (SMH) model: TEAM, an in-person, multidisciplinary team-based approach delivered at point of care and TECH, a technology-based (digital therapeutics, and telehealth) approach delivered at the patient's convenience with the guidance of health coaches. Both are designed to support care for adult patients with complex, chronic health conditions and behavioral health (BH) disorders, and will be tested in three of the nation's largest and most established SMHs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD serves as an exemplary chronic disease model where untreated BH issues have been associated with poor medical outcomes. Primary outcomes are composite scores of measures focused on 1) IBD Symptom Severity, and 2) BH Symptom Severity. IBD Symptom Severity is measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score involving responses to two patient-reported scales: the PROMIS-GI measure and either the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for participants with Crohn's disease) or ulcerative colitis activity index (for participants with ulcerative colitis). BH Symptom Severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS), a composite of two patient-reported scale for measuring anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8). Scales are further defined in Results, Outcome Measures.
Interventions
TEAM incorporates team-based care with traditional in-person clinic visits. The care team includes a gastroenterologist, nurse practitioner, nutritionist, social worker/behavioral health specialist, and a psychologist or psychiatrist.
TECH uses team-based care similar to TEAM, but in-person care is substituted with telemedicine (i.e., video visits and consultations) and digital behavioral health tools.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Comparison between technology interventions and in-person interventions.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis of Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis. Behavioral health symptoms mild to severe, defined as a score of \>= 6 on the Personal Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4)
Exclusion criteria
* Lack of smart phone, and/or are unable to speak, read or understand English at the minimum-required level.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IBD Symptom Severity | Compare scores at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes | IBD symptom severity was measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score developed by clinical researchers to quantify both biological and psychosocial domains of IBD within an SMH setting. It includes the sum of patient-reported responses to two scales: the PROMIS GI symptoms scale, evaluating four domains of gastrointestinal symptoms; and disease-specific PRO-2 disease severity indices taken from the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for individuals with Crohn's disease) and Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (for individuals with ulcerative colitis). The complexity score is calculated by adding the value of the patient's PRO-2 to the cumulative PROMIS-GI score. Lower scores indicate lower symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is open-ended based on patient response. Only the total IBD Complexity Score is reported. |
| Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Compare at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes | Behavioral health symptom severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) - which combines the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scales - as a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item depression scale (PHQ-8) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) are among the best validated and most commonly used depression and anxiety measures, respectively. The PHQ-ADS is the sum of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7, where a decrease in scores indicates a decrease in BH symptom severity; a decrease of 3-4 points indicates MCID. Lower scores indicate lower levels of behavioral health symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is 45. Only the total PHQ-ADS is reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care Utilization | Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-months for any changes | Health care utilization was captured through EHR data to measure categorical (yes or no) instances of ED visits and inpatient hospitalizations at both 6- and 12-months post-enrollment. |
| Functional Impairment | Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes | Functional impairment was measured using the validated Short Form 12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2) which includes 12 items from the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and yields a physical and mental composite score as well as 8 subscale values: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Responses are tallied via a norm-based scoring algorithm provided by the assessment licensing company. Lower scores correspond with poorer health-related functioning; higher scores indicate better health-related functioning. The minimum score is 18.5; the maximum score is 142.6. Only the total composite score (the sum of both the physical and mental scales) is reported. |
| Quality of Life | Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes | Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), a validated tool which measures physical, social, and emotional health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. On a 7-point scale, lower scores correspond with a lower perceived QOL, while higher scores represent a higher perceived QOL. Responses for each question are summed for a total score between 10 and 70, with 10 reflecting poor QOL and 70 reflecting high QOL. Each item is scored 1-7, with 1 being assigned for responses indicating the highest severity of symptoms, and 7 being assigned for those reflecting the lowest severity of symptoms. Only total scores are reported. |
| Patient Engagement | Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes | Patient engagement was measured using the validated IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) which assesses one's confidence level in managing stress and emotions, managing medical care, managing symptoms and disease, and maintaining remission. The IBD-SES measures self-management activities across four subscales (Stress and Emotions; Medical Care; Symptoms and Disease; Remission), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-management. Responses for each question are summed to produce one overall and four subscale scores. The total score range is between 29 and 290, with 29 indicating the lowest level of self-efficacy and 290 indicating the highest. Each item is scored 1-10, with 1 being assigned for responses of Not confident at all and a score of 10 assigned for responses of Totally confident. Only total scores are reported. |
| IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity was measured using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) to more accurately capture IBD symptom severity for many individuals with IBD, particularly those with inactive IBD but persistent functional GI symptoms (e.g., IBD-IBS). The IBS-SSS scores pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal bloating, bowel satisfaction and interference with life on a 0-100 scale with a total score of 500. A 50-point or more reduction in this score is considered clinically meaningful. Total scores range from 0 to 500 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Answers to all questions are summed to achieve the total score. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (\>300) IBS. Only total scores are reported. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment began on July 1, 2019 and was completed on February 28, 2024. A brief pause in recruitment occurred between March 13 and September 13, 2020 to account for disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. All participants were recruited from one of three specialty medical home clinics at large urban academic centers in the northeastern US: UPMC in Pittsburgh, Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, and the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland.
Pre-assignment details
All participants were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention arms upon successful enrollment in the study. Allocation was stratified based on age (18-30 or 31-60), IBD diagnosis (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) and disease activity (low or high).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| TEAM TEAM is a high-human touch, multidisciplinary specialty medical home approach that connects participants with a personalized care team including gastroenterologists, advanced practice providers, behavioral health specialists, dietitians, registered nurses, pharmacists, and health coordinators who provide intensive support and resources for patients. | 329 |
| TECH TECH is a low-human touch approach leveraging behavioral digital tools - primarily RxWell, a digital cognitive behavioral therapy mobile application with embedded health coaches - to deliver behavioral health care at the patient's convenience. | 328 |
| Total | 657 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | TEAM | Total | TECH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced therapy No | 144 Participants | 303 Participants | 159 Participants |
| Advanced therapy Yes | 185 Participants | 354 Participants | 169 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 34.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 34.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 | 34.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 |
| Comorbidity No | 182 Participants | 367 Participants | 185 Participants |
| Comorbidity Yes | 147 Participants | 290 Participants | 143 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 17 Participants | 30 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 269 Participants | 544 Participants | 275 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 43 Participants | 83 Participants | 40 Participants |
| IBD Diagnosis Crohn's disease | 222 Participants | 440 Participants | 218 Participants |
| IBD Diagnosis Ulcerative colitis | 107 Participants | 217 Participants | 110 Participants |
| Opioid use Missing | 5 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Opioid use No | 216 Participants | 434 Participants | 218 Participants |
| Opioid use Yes | 108 Participants | 213 Participants | 105 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 24 Participants | 37 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 5 Participants | 16 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 40 Participants | 70 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 254 Participants | 525 Participants | 271 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Female | 211 Participants | 424 Participants | 213 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Male | 93 Participants | 183 Participants | 90 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Missing | 22 Participants | 45 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Other | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Gender Prefer not to answer | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Steroid Use No | 208 Participants | 417 Participants | 209 Participants |
| Steroid Use Yes | 121 Participants | 240 Participants | 119 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 329 | 2 / 328 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 329 | 0 / 328 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 329 | 0 / 328 |
Outcome results
Behavioral Health Symptom Severity
Behavioral health symptom severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) - which combines the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scales - as a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item depression scale (PHQ-8) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) are among the best validated and most commonly used depression and anxiety measures, respectively. The PHQ-ADS is the sum of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7, where a decrease in scores indicates a decrease in BH symptom severity; a decrease of 3-4 points indicates MCID. Lower scores indicate lower levels of behavioral health symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is 45. Only the total PHQ-ADS is reported.
Time frame: Compare at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Score at baseline | 25.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.88 |
| TEAM | Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Score at 6-month follow-up | 18.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| TEAM | Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Score at 12-month follow-up | 18.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| TECH | Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Score at 6-month follow-up | 19.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| TECH | Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Score at baseline | 26.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
| TECH | Behavioral Health Symptom Severity | Score at 12-month follow-up | 19.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
IBD Symptom Severity
IBD symptom severity was measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score developed by clinical researchers to quantify both biological and psychosocial domains of IBD within an SMH setting. It includes the sum of patient-reported responses to two scales: the PROMIS GI symptoms scale, evaluating four domains of gastrointestinal symptoms; and disease-specific PRO-2 disease severity indices taken from the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for individuals with Crohn's disease) and Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (for individuals with ulcerative colitis). The complexity score is calculated by adding the value of the patient's PRO-2 to the cumulative PROMIS-GI score. Lower scores indicate lower symptom severity; higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The minimum score is 0; the maximum score is open-ended based on patient response. Only the total IBD Complexity Score is reported.
Time frame: Compare scores at Baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
Population: Participants were included in the analysis for IBD Symptom Severity as long as they had complete covariate data and the IBD Complexity Score measured at at least one timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | IBD Symptom Severity | Score at baseline | 75.9 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31 |
| TEAM | IBD Symptom Severity | Score at 6-month follow-up | 63.5 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30 |
| TEAM | IBD Symptom Severity | Score at 12-month follow-up | 62.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.2 |
| TECH | IBD Symptom Severity | Score at baseline | 79.9 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.3 |
| TECH | IBD Symptom Severity | Score at 6-month follow-up | 65.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.2 |
| TECH | IBD Symptom Severity | Score at 12-month follow-up | 64.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.2 |
Functional Impairment
Functional impairment was measured using the validated Short Form 12 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2) which includes 12 items from the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and yields a physical and mental composite score as well as 8 subscale values: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Responses are tallied via a norm-based scoring algorithm provided by the assessment licensing company. Lower scores correspond with poorer health-related functioning; higher scores indicate better health-related functioning. The minimum score is 18.5; the maximum score is 142.6. Only the total composite score (the sum of both the physical and mental scales) is reported.
Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | Functional Impairment | Score at 12-month follow-up | 33.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| TEAM | Functional Impairment | Score at baseline | 37.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.57 |
| TEAM | Functional Impairment | Score at 6-month follow-up | 34.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.98 |
| TECH | Functional Impairment | Score at baseline | 38.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.36 |
| TECH | Functional Impairment | Score at 6-month follow-up | 34.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.58 |
| TECH | Functional Impairment | Score at 12-month follow-up | 33.5 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.07 |
Health Care Utilization
Health care utilization was captured through EHR data to measure categorical (yes or no) instances of ED visits and inpatient hospitalizations at both 6- and 12-months post-enrollment.
Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-months for any changes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | Health Care Utilization | ED Visits | Yes | 27 Participants |
| TEAM | Health Care Utilization | ED Visits | Missing | 5 Participants |
| TEAM | Health Care Utilization | Hospitalizations | Yes | 35 Participants |
| TEAM | Health Care Utilization | Hospitalizations | No | 292 Participants |
| TEAM | Health Care Utilization | Hospitalizations | Missing | 2 Participants |
| TEAM | Health Care Utilization | ED Visits | No | 297 Participants |
| TECH | Health Care Utilization | Hospitalizations | Missing | 1 Participants |
| TECH | Health Care Utilization | ED Visits | Yes | 31 Participants |
| TECH | Health Care Utilization | Hospitalizations | No | 291 Participants |
| TECH | Health Care Utilization | ED Visits | Missing | 0 Participants |
| TECH | Health Care Utilization | ED Visits | No | 297 Participants |
| TECH | Health Care Utilization | Hospitalizations | Yes | 36 Participants |
IBD-IBS Symptom Severity
IBD-IBS Symptom Severity was measured using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) to more accurately capture IBD symptom severity for many individuals with IBD, particularly those with inactive IBD but persistent functional GI symptoms (e.g., IBD-IBS). The IBS-SSS scores pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal bloating, bowel satisfaction and interference with life on a 0-100 scale with a total score of 500. A 50-point or more reduction in this score is considered clinically meaningful. Total scores range from 0 to 500 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Answers to all questions are summed to achieve the total score. Subjects can be categorized as having mild (75-175), moderate (175-300), or severe (\>300) IBS. Only total scores are reported.
Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Score at 6-month follow-up | 185 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 125 |
| TEAM | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Score at 12-month follow-up | 174 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 124 |
| TEAM | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Score at baseline | 222 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 135 |
| TECH | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Score at baseline | 238 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 130 |
| TECH | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Score at 6-month follow-up | 175 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 123 |
| TECH | IBD-IBS Symptom Severity | Score at 12-month follow-up | 179 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 125 |
Patient Engagement
Patient engagement was measured using the validated IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) which assesses one's confidence level in managing stress and emotions, managing medical care, managing symptoms and disease, and maintaining remission. The IBD-SES measures self-management activities across four subscales (Stress and Emotions; Medical Care; Symptoms and Disease; Remission), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in self-management. Responses for each question are summed to produce one overall and four subscale scores. The total score range is between 29 and 290, with 29 indicating the lowest level of self-efficacy and 290 indicating the highest. Each item is scored 1-10, with 1 being assigned for responses of Not confident at all and a score of 10 assigned for responses of Totally confident. Only total scores are reported.
Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | Patient Engagement | Score at baseline | 161 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 40 |
| TEAM | Patient Engagement | Score at 6-month follow-up | 174 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 47.5 |
| TEAM | Patient Engagement | Score at 12-month follow-up | 178 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 54 |
| TECH | Patient Engagement | Score at 6-month follow-up | 178 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 46.9 |
| TECH | Patient Engagement | Score at baseline | 157 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.8 |
| TECH | Patient Engagement | Score at 12-month follow-up | 178 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 49.7 |
Quality of Life
Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), a validated tool which measures physical, social, and emotional health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. On a 7-point scale, lower scores correspond with a lower perceived QOL, while higher scores represent a higher perceived QOL. Responses for each question are summed for a total score between 10 and 70, with 10 reflecting poor QOL and 70 reflecting high QOL. Each item is scored 1-7, with 1 being assigned for responses indicating the highest severity of symptoms, and 7 being assigned for those reflecting the lowest severity of symptoms. Only total scores are reported.
Time frame: Compare at baseline, 6-month and 12-month for any changes
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | Quality of Life | Score at baseline | 37.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| TEAM | Quality of Life | Score at 6-month follow-up | 42.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| TEAM | Quality of Life | Score at 12-month follow-up | 43.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.5 |
| TECH | Quality of Life | Score at baseline | 35.5 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| TECH | Quality of Life | Score at 6-month follow-up | 41.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.9 |
| TECH | Quality of Life | Score at 12-month follow-up | 43.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |