Skip to content

Amyloidosis Typing Using Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics: a New Accurate Tool for Difficult Typing

Amyloidosis Typing Using Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics: a New Accurate Tool for Difficult Typing

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03984721
Acronym
TYPAMYL
Enrollment
27
Registered
2019-06-13
Start date
2019-07-25
Completion date
2021-09-08
Last updated
2023-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyloidosis

Keywords

Mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis, NanoLC-MS/MS, Amyloidosis typing

Brief summary

The main objective is to establish that a new technique of amyloidosis typing by Proteomics (based on nanoLC-MS/MS mass spectrometry) allows typing in \> 90% of observations in patients whose Amyloidosis is reported to have failed typing (impossible typing, uncertain or inconsistent) with the traditional anatomopathological approach, and this in a cohort of 40 patients identified consecutively in the Department of pathological anatomy and cytology of the University Hospital of Toulouse and included prospectively.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAmyloidosis typing using mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Amyloidosis typing using nanoLC-MS/MS method

Sponsors

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Inclusion of 40 patients identified by the Department of Anatomy and pathological cytology at the University of Toulouse.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Amyloidosis by Red Congo staining and birefringence in polarized light on tissue sampling * Immunolabeling Amyloidosis typing 1. impossible (no frozen sample available) 2. or inconclusive (doubtful) 3. or inconsistent with clinical, biological, genetic and iconographic data * Signature of the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient tissue material to perform the new technique * Person placed under judicial protection * Pregnant and breastfeeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amyloidosis typingDay 0Amyloidosis typing rate with the new technique

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to return the resultDay 0Time to return the result with the new technique (time in days)
ConcordanceDay 0Agreement between the proteomic conclusion and the clinical judgement (binary answer : yes/no)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026