Anesthesia
Conditions
Keywords
LMA Protector Cuff Pilot, LMA Supreme, Clinical Performance
Brief summary
Comparison of clinical performance between LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure, time to insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, laryngeal view, incidence of sore throat
Interventions
DEVICELMA Protector Cuff Pilot
Assessing the clinical performance of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot
DEVICELMA Supreme
Assessing the clinical performance of LMA Supreme
Sponsors
Liu Chian Yong
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients planned for general anaesthesia without muscle relaxant usage via supraglottic airway device.
Exclusion criteria
* BMI \> 35 * Patients with likelihood of difficult intubation (Simplified Airway Risk Index Score of 4 or more) * Patients with increased risks of aspirations (gastrooesophageal reflux disease, obstetric patients, hiatus hernia)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) | During induction of anaesthesia | To assess the OLP of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean time to insertion | During induction of anaesthesia | To compare mean time to insertion of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme |
| Gastric tube insertion | After induction of anaesthesia | To compare the ease of gastric tube insertion in LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme |
| Laryngeal view | After induction of anaesthesia | To compare the laryngeal view between LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme |
| Complications | 24 hours | To compare the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness of voice after insertion of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme |
Countries
Malaysia
Outcome results
None listed