Skip to content

Finnish Trial on Practices of Anterior Cervical Decompression (FACADE) Comparing Outpatient vs. Inpatient Care

Finnish Trial on Practices of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (FACADE): A Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Outpatient vs. Inpatient Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03979443
Acronym
FACADE
Enrollment
104
Registered
2019-06-07
Start date
2019-06-12
Completion date
2021-10-30
Last updated
2023-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radiculopathy

Keywords

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion, cervical fusion, cervical spine, spinal surgery, outpatient care, randomized controlled trial, Protocol

Brief summary

FACADE is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel group non-inferiority trial comparing the traditional hospital surveillance (inpatient, patients staying in the hospital for 1-3 nights after surgery) to outpatient care (discharge on the day of the surgery, usually within 6-8 hours after procedure) in patients who have undergone anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) procedure.

Detailed description

To determine whether early discharge (outpatient care) is noninferior to inpatient care, the investigators will randomize 104 patients to these two groups and follow them for 6 months using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as the primary outcome. The investigators expect that early discharge is not significantly worse (inferior) than the current care in terms of change in NDI. Noninferiority will be declared if the mean improvement for outpatient care is no worse than the mean improvement for inpatient care, within statistical variability, by a margin of 17.3%. The investigators hypothesize that a shorter hospital stay results in more rapid return to normal daily activities, shorter duration of sick leave and decreased secondary costs to health care system. Secondary outcomes in the study are arm pain and neck pain using the Numeric Rating Scale, operative success (Odom's criteria), patient's satisfaction to treatment, general quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), work ability score (WAS), sickness absence days, return to previous leisure activities, and complications. Patients who are eligible for the trial, but are not willing to undergo randomization, will be asked to be included in a simultaneous, pragmatic follow-up cohort.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDischarge on the day of surgery

Patient discharge on the day of the surgery, usually within 6-8 hours after procedure

Sponsors

Turku University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Oulu University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 62 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Cervical radiculopathy syndrome (CRS) unresponsive to non-operative treatment for at least six weeks or with severe progressive signs and symptoms of nerve root compression during conservative treatment of shorter duration. 2. CRS is defined as pain, paresis or paresthesia in corresponding nerve root distribution areas of C5, C6, C7 or C8. 3. Nerve root stenosis determined by magnetic resonance imaging at treatment level correlating to CRS/symptoms 4. Neck Disability Index score ≥30 out of 100 5. Age between 18 to 62 years 6. No previous cervical operations 7. Currently employed 8. No co-morbidities causing a need for a sick leave 9. Provision of informed consent from the participant 10. No contraindication for randomization in postoperative check (see below)

Exclusion criteria

1. MRI finding inconsistent with patient's symptoms 2. Diagnosed osteoporosis or permanent use of oral corticosteroids 3. ACDF operation requiring plate or cage fixation with screws 4. Active malignancy 5. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification system (ASA) 4 and 5 patients (seriously ill patients) 6. Pregnancy 7. Abundant use of alcohol, drugs or narcotics 8. No possibility to be accompanied by an adult person over the first postoperative night after the surgery 9. Insufficient Finnish language skills 10. Distance to the closest hospital emergency more than 60 min

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline Neck Disability Index at 6 months after operationBefore and up to 6 months after operationNeck disability Index scale score ranges from 0 to 100%. Score 0 indicates no disability as score 100% indicates worst possible disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline Numeric rating scale on neck pain at six months after operationBefore and up to 6 months after operationNumeric rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain
Change from baseline Numeric rating scale on arm pain at six months after operationBefore and up to 6 months after operationNumeric rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain
Rate of returning to previous leisure activities after operationBefore and up to 6 months after operationBefore the operation, participants will be asked to name the most important daily leisure activity they are not able to perform because of the disease. At each follow-up time point (Table 2), participants will be asked to respond to the following question: Have you been able to return to your leisure activity? (yes or no)
Change from baseline Work Ability Score (WAS) at six months after operationBefore and up to 6 months after operationNumeric rating score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates that participant is completely incapable to work and 10 indicates participants work ability at its best
The duration of sick leaveBefore and after operationthe number of sickness absence days from work both before and after the operation. The number of sickness absence days will be treated as a continuous variable

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative successat one week, one month, three months and six months after operationpatient subjectively rates the perception of operative success from poor to excellent by the modified Odom's criteria. the first and second categories ('excellent' and 'good') as a successful outcome of the operation and conversely, last two categories ('fair' and 'poor') as an unsuccessful outcome.
Rate of complications and adverse effectsFrom operation up to six months postoperativelyThe rate of complications related to intervention or operation in both group after operation
Patient satisfaction to treatmentat six months after operationpatients' global assessment of satisfaction to the treatment at six months after operation with this question: If you were to choose again, would you choose an operative treatment? (yes or no).
Change from baseline Euroqol 5 dimensional questionnaire of generic quality of life measurement (EQ-5D-5L) at six months after operationBefore and at 6 months after operationEQ-5D-5L descriptive score ranges from 0 (no problems in health state) to 25 (maximal problem in health state). EQ-5D-5L Visual analogic score (VAS) ranges form 0 (the worst health) to 100 (the best health) assessed by participant.

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026