Neck Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Chronic Neck Pain, Interferential Current Electrotherapy, Therapeutic Exercise, Physical Therapy
Brief summary
Objectives: To analyze the number of sessions needed to achieve a positive impact after combining interferential current therapy and therapeutic exercise, compared with therapeutic exercise alone, on self-reported pain, disability and range of motion in subjects with chronic neck pain. Design: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Subjects: Patients between 18 and 65 years old, with idiopathic chronic neck pain. Methods: The experimental group who will perform a combined treatment using Interferential current therapy and therapeutic exercise for two weeks. The control group will receive the same program of therapeutic exercise during the same period of time.
Interventions
OTHERInterferential Current and Therapeutic Exercise Program
The Interferential Current Program will be based on a bipolar application using the Sonopuls 692 device (Enraf Nonius, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). The current parameters will be: a) 4000Hz carrier frequency; and b) 60 Hz AMF with a modulation frequency of 90 Hz. The intensity of the current will be adapted to the sensitivity of each patient. The Therapeutic Exercise Program will be applied by a physiotherapist and will consist of: 1. Ergonomic advices on reducing repetitive movements and/or maintained positions 2. A protocol of active physiotherapy for neck and shoulder muscles. This protocol will include: active stretching exercises; isometric muscle strengthening exercises; reeducation of the ocular and neck muscles with control retraining exercises
The Therapeutic Exercise Program will be applied by a physiotherapist and will consist of: 1. Ergonomic advices on reducing repetitive movements and/or maintained positions 2. A protocol of active physiotherapy for neck and shoulder muscles. This protocol will include: active stretching exercises; isometric muscle strengthening exercises; reeducation of the ocular and neck muscles with control retraining exercises
Sponsors
University of Seville
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Nonspecific mechanical neck pain (chronic neck pain diagnosed by a physician) * Age between 18 and 65 years old * Both males and females * Non apprehension to electrotherapy (determined by the Personal Psychological Apprehension scale- EAPP) * Self-reported pain higher than 2 in the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Exclusion criteria
* Metallic implants in the vertebral column * Apprehension to electrotherapy (a score \>45 points in EAPP) * Cervicogenic headache * Cervicogenic Dizziness * Neck pain associated with neurological deficits * Unexplained fever * Cervical surgery associated to persistent pain * Specific diagnostics (cervical myelopathy, cervical stenosis, osteomyopathy) * Other diagnostics such as visceral pain referred to the neck or non-cervical cause. * Involvement in litigation * Manual treatment for the neck-shoulder area in the last month before data collection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Neck pain intensity | From baseline to immediately after treatment | Participants will rate the intensity of their neck pain at rest on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale, where 0 is no pain and 11 maximum pain. The subjects will be ask to indicate the pain levels that they experienced before treatment and after treatment. |
| Disability | From baseline to immediately after treatment | The Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be used in the Spanish version to measure level of disability of the neck area during the daily life activities. where under 9 denotes No Disability; from 10 to 29 denotes Slight Disability; from 30 to 49 denotes Moderate Disability; from 50 to 69 denotes Severe Disability and more tan 70 denote Complete Disability. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Range of movement (ROM) | From baseline to immediately after treatment | The secondary outcome measure will be the active cervical range of motion assessed with the CROM device (Performance Attainment Associates, Lindstrom, MN). The measurements will be made separately for each direction and in a standard sequence: flexion, extension, right lateral flexion, left lateral flexion, right rotation and left rotation. Two measurements will be recorded for each movement and the average of the two measurements will be used in the analysis of results |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed