Skip to content

Modeling Clinical Failure in Prostate Cancer Patients Based on a Two-stage Statistical Model

Modeling Clinical Failure in Prostate Cancer Patients Based on a Two-stage Statistical Model

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03979079
Acronym
PREDYC
Enrollment
2384
Registered
2019-06-07
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2017-01-01
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

Biomarker series can indicate disease progression and predict clinical endpoints. When a treatment is prescribed depending on the biomarker, confounding by indication might be introduced if the treatment modifies the marker profile and risk of failure. The two-stage model fitted within a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo framework is particularly flexible to account for such data. Prostate-specific antigens in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy can be monitored. In the presence of rising prostate-specific antigens after external beam radiation therapy, salvage hormone therapy can be prescribed to reduce both the prostate-specific antigens concentration and the risk of clinical failure, an illustration of confounding by indication. The prognostic value of hormone therapy and prostate-specific antigens trajectory on the risk of failure based on a two-stage model within a Bayesian framework to assess the role of the prostate-specific antigens profile on clinical failure while accounting for a secondary treatment prescribed by indication. the aim of this research is to model prostate specific antigens using a hierarchical piecewise linear trajectory with a random changepoint. Residual prostate-specific antigens variability can be expressed as a function of prostate-specific antigens concentration. Covariates in the survival model can include : hormone therapy, baseline characteristics, and individual predictions of the prostate-specific antigens nadir and timing and prostate-specific antigens slopes before and after the nadir as provided by the longitudinal process.

Detailed description

The two-stage modeling approach allows estimation of the regression coefficients in a time-dependent Cox model, while addressing the limitations with the knowledge of the true marker trajectory. In the first stage, the longitudinal process is modeled using a repeated measures component model, such as a random effects model. In the second stage, estimated characteristics of the longitudinal marker trajectory, such as slopes, are included as covariates in a survival model to assess their prognostic value. Our aim was to highlight the flexibility of a two-stage model fitted within a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework. We applied this model to assess the prognostic value of the prostate-specific antigens (PSA) profile (level and timing of the nadir; pre- and post-nadir slopes) as well as salvage hormonal treatment (HT) on the risk of clinical failure following external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the presence of confounding by indication. We first present the longitudinal hierarchical PSA model that we developed earlier. This model was particularly flexible since it allowed us to account for the presence of a random changepoint as well as the modeling of the residual variability as a function of the PSA concentration. We next extend the longitudinal model to a two-stage model by using estimated parameters of the longitudinal process as covariates in a Cox proportional hazards model to assess prognostic factors of clinical failure including baseline characteristics, PSA trajectory, and HT.

Interventions

RADIATIONexternal beam radiation therapy

Sponsors

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Institut Bergonié
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinically localized prostate cancer * Clinical stage T1 to T4 * Node and metastasis negative * Treated with external beam radiation therapy (RT).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with baseline or planned hormonotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Failure After Initiation of Radiotherapywithin 10 years following initiation of radiotherapyClinical failure is defined as any of the following events following initiation of radiotherapy: distant metastases, nodal recurrence, or any palpable or biopsy-detected local recurrence three years after radiation; any local recurrence within three years of RT if the most previous PSA was\>2 ng/ml; and death from prostate cancer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With Initiation of Salvage Therapy After Radiotherapywithin 10 years following initiation of radiotherapy

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eligible Patients
Eligible Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing EBRT Treatment
2,384
Total2,384

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEligible Patients
Age, Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2384 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2,384
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Failure After Initiation of Radiotherapy

Clinical failure is defined as any of the following events following initiation of radiotherapy: distant metastases, nodal recurrence, or any palpable or biopsy-detected local recurrence three years after radiation; any local recurrence within three years of RT if the most previous PSA was\>2 ng/ml; and death from prostate cancer.

Time frame: within 10 years following initiation of radiotherapy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PatientsNumber of Participants With Clinical Failure After Initiation of Radiotherapy315 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Initiation of Salvage Therapy After Radiotherapy

Time frame: within 10 years following initiation of radiotherapy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PatientsNumber of Participants With Initiation of Salvage Therapy After Radiotherapy267 Participants
Post Hoc

Prognostic Value of Hormone Therapy on the Risk of Clinical Failure.

Time frame: within 10 years following initiation of radiotherapy

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PatientsPrognostic Value of Hormone Therapy on the Risk of Clinical Failure.0.21 hazard ratio
95% CI: [0.14, 0.3]Two-stage model.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026