Glaucoma, Glaucoma, Suspect
Conditions
Keywords
glaucoma
Brief summary
Early glaucomatous visual field changes can be missed with the routinely used Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) and the 24-2 test pattern due to limited sampling of the central 10 degrees. While this shortcoming can be overcome with the addition of a 10-2 test, performing both tests places extra demand on the perimetric services (doubling test times) and patients. Smart Supra Perimetry (SSP) uses a new faster algorithm that can complete both 24-2 and 10-2 test patterns in a similar time frame to a single 24-2 SAP test. This comparative study aims to determine the sensitivity and specificity (i.e. diagnostic accuracy) of SSP in identifying early glaucomatous visual field loss. A sample of 100 patients with early/suspect glaucoma will undergo SAP 24-2 and 10-2 (SITA algorithm) using Humphrey visual field perimetry and SSP 24+10-2 using Henson 9000. Eyes will be categorised into 2 groups i.e., glaucoma and non-glaucoma, on the basis of structural changes to the disc as evaluated by the clinician. The sensitivity and specificity of the SAP and SSP tests will be established along with test duration. The size and location of defects established with both the SAP and SSP strategies will also be compared.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHumphrey Visual Field Test
SITA Standard and 24-2 and 10-2 visual field tests
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Scan
Circle and Wide Angle Scans
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSmart Perimetry - Henson 9000
24+10-2 Smart Supra test
Sponsors
University of Manchester
Columbia University
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
All participants will have the same examinations but in a randomised order, these examinations are: Humphrey Visual Fields Test (10-2 and 24-2, SITA Standard), OCT Scan (Cube scan, Wide angle and macula scan) and Smart Perimetry - Henson 9000.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Reliable SAP visual field results (fixation loss \< 33%, false positive \< 15% and false negative \< 20%). * Visual acuity better or equal to 0.20 logMAR. * Spherical refractive error within -6.00 to +6.00D and cylindrical error \<2.00D * No ocular co-morbidity likely to affect the visual field or OCT results. * Age: 40-80 yrs Additional inclusion criteria for glaucomatous group: * Optic disc showing glaucomatous changes. * SAP MD not worse than -6dB Additional inclusion criteria non-glaucoma group: * Normal SAP visual field data (MD, PSD, GHT within normal range) * No evidence of glaucoma or other Ocular co-morbidity in the eye suitable for the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic performance of smart supra perimetry | 12 months | Area under the curve for Smart Suprathrold Perimetry using probability thresholds to differentiate early glaucoma from non-glaucomatous visual fields. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic performance of Optical Coherent Tomography | 12 months | Sensitivity and specificity for Optical Coherent Tomography in the detection of early glaucoma. |
| Diagnostic performance of Standard Automated perimetry | 12 months | Sensitivity and specificity for Standard Automated perimetry in the detection of early glaucoma. |
Countries
United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed