Skip to content

Nutrition Health Literacy of Cancer Patients and Their Support Networks.

Implications of Nutrition Health Literacy on Accessibility and Engagement With Nutrition Information in Cancer Patients and Their Support Networks

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03978312
Acronym
NiiCproject
Enrollment
58
Registered
2019-06-07
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Haematological Malignancy, Nutrition Aspect of Cancer, Oncologic Disorders

Keywords

Nutrition, Health, Literacy, Education, Information, Knowledge

Brief summary

An exploration of the impact of nutrition literacy on ability of cancer patients and their support networks to get, understand and use nutrition information during cancer treatment.

Detailed description

The study is composed of two component projects: Project A: Validation of a NLit tool for UK population. NLit tool is a measurement tool developed at Kansas University to measure nutrition health literacy. It assesses the following functional literacy skills: numeracy & literacy and the following nutrition knowledge fields: macronutrients, food labels, portion sizes, food groups and consumer skills. This project has two phases: Phase A: Nominal consensus groups x 2 - consumer adaptation and tool review for UK use and pilot testing of electronic tool. Phase B: Testing adapted tool in a group of cancer patients for statistical validation. Project B: Planned survey of people with cancer and their families to explore experiences of access to nutrition information This survey is a combination of validated and unvalidated questions built on models of nutrition health literacy. With validated fields being used to evaluate and understand responses to unvalidated questions. It explores access to nutrition information, self-efficacy, confidence, health care infrastructure and support with nutrition information, population demographics, food security, sources of nutrition information, perceived practical skills and knowledge base.

Interventions

OTHERNominal consensus group

NLit-UK linguistic and cultural adaptation (NLit-UK) 2 x nominal consensus groups evidence review and topic expert engagement

OTHERObservational cohort (validity and reliability testing)

Nutrition Literacy Measurement Tool validation (NLit-UK). Target sample 366 on treatment cancer patients confirmatory binary analysis for validity and reliability.

Sponsors

Macmillan Cancer Support
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kansas
CollaboratorOTHER
Bishop Grosseteste University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Newcastle University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

NLit-UK development Inclusion Criteria: * Members of the public (carers, health service users, lay persons) * Cancer patients with confirmed diagnosis * Friends or family members supporting a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer * \> 18 yrs old * Received cancer treatment at Nottingham University Hospitals between Jan 15 and March 20

Exclusion criteria

* Paediatrics \< 18yrs at the time of diagnosis and treatment * Unconfirmed diagnosis of cancer * Patients on watch and wait

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nutrition health literacy - UKJun 19 - Mar 2020Measured by UK modified NLit developed during study cultural and linguistic modification of (Gibbs et al., 2018 - original validation) - 64 item questionnaire Scoring interpretation from study: NLit-UK (63item) and NLit-UK short (42-item) NLit-UK (63-item): Scoring interpretation is ≤44 correct is likelihood of poor nutrition literacy; 45-57 is possibility of poor nutrition literacy; and scores ≥58 is likelihood of good nutrition literacy NLit-UK short (42-item): Scoring interpretation is ≤28 correct is likelihood of poor nutrition literacy; 29-37 is possibility of poor nutrition literacy; and scores ≥39 is likelihood of good nutrition literacy
NVS-UK health literacyJun 19 - Mar 2020Validated tool - 6 part question (Rowlands et al, 2013) Scoring interpretation: low health literacy (≤1), intermediate health literacy (2-3), adequate health literacy (≥4).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
How important did you consider nutrition was in helping you through your treatment?Jun 19 - Mar 2020Response sets: Didn't know enough to consider / Not important ; Moderately Important; Very or extremely important
Economic status (modified HINTS 2)Jun 19 - Mar 2020At the end of the month, how much money are you able to put aside? (Nothing, £100 or less, £101-250, £251-500, £501-1000, more than £1000, do not want to say).
Prior KnowledgeJun 19 - Mar 2020Did you receive any nutrition advice as part of your care for any of these conditions? (Yes or No).
Educational status (modified HINTS4 Cyc1)Jun 19 - Mar 2020What is the highest grade or level of schooling you completed? GCSE D or less/ GCSE C or above/ Unsure

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026