Skip to content

The Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a Measure of Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerate Disc Disease.

The Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a Measure of Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerate Disc Disease.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03977961
Acronym
6MWT-DDD
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-06-06
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
2020-05-01
Last updated
2022-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spine Degeneration

Brief summary

The study determines the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).

Detailed description

The purposes of the study is to assess the ability of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a reliable and standardized objective outcome assessment and its relation to already established subjective patient reported outcome measures in patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disc disease. We want to use an existing smartphone-application that uses global positioning system (GPS) coordinates to measure walking distance. Applying self- measurement of the 6MWT before and after a therapeutic intervention, we determine objective functional impairment (OFI) in patients. The results of this study add to the understanding of achievable objective outcomes after therapeutic interventions applied to patients with DDD and examines patients acceptance for smartphone based self-measurement. Primary Objectives The primary objective is to determine the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) Secondary objectives are 1. to correlate objective functional impairment (OFI) with already established patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) in the sense of cross-validation. 2. To correlate OFI, as determined by the 6MWT with OFI that is determined by another objective test, the TUG test 3. to then analyze the change in OFI in patients before and after surgical intervention 4. to determine whether patients prefer the objective (6MWT) or subjective (PROMs) repeated assessment of their functional condition.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

PD Dr. med. Martin Stienen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
PD Dr. med. Oliver Gautschi, Neuro- und Wirbelsäulen Zentrum Zentral-schweiz, Luzern
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Patient scheduled for spine surgery with one of the following diagnosis (1) lumbar disc herniation (LDH), (2) lumbar spinal stenosis lumbar (LSS) or lumbar DDD with or without instability requiring lumbar fusion (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, or extreme lateral interbody fusion) * Male and Female subjects ≥ 18 years * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Inability to walk (extreme pain or severe neurological deficits) * Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD) corresponding to ≥ Gold III * Severe heart failure corresponding to ≥ New York Heart Association (NYHA) III * Lung cancer and diffuse parenchymal lung disease * Other medical reasons interfering with the patient's ability to walk and perform the 6MWT (e.g., osteoarthritis disease of the lower extremities, Parkinson's disease, heart failure, hip or knee prosthesis etc.) * Unavailability for follow up and/or inability to complete assessment (planning to move, no smartphone, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Raw walking distance4-12 weeksRaw walking distance (in m), as measured with the 6MWT, between the baseline- (before surgery) and follow-up assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DTFS4-12 weeksDifference in Distance to First Symptoms (DTFS, in m), as measured by the 6MWT, between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)4-12 weeksDifference in PROM, as measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ average score, range 0 (best) - 4,5 (worst), between the baseline- and follow-up assessment.
Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)4-12 weeksDifference in health-related quality of life (hrQoL), as measured by the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI average score, range 0 (best) - 10 (worst)), between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
TTFS/ZCQ baseline4-12 weeksCorrelation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the ZCQ score at baseline
TTFS/ZCQ follow-up4-12 weeksCorrelation of TTFS in the 6MWT with the ZCQ score at follow-up
TTFS4-12 weeksDifference in Time to First Symptoms (TTFS; in sec) as measured by the 6MWT, between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
TTFS/COMI follow-up4-12 weeksCorrelation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the COMI score at follow-up
TTFS/TUG baseline4-12 weeksCorrelation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the Timed up go Test (TUG) at baseline
TTFS/TUG follow-up4-12 weeksCorrelation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the TUG at follow-up
Test-retest reliability of the 6MWT6 weeks to 1 day before surgery as well as 4-12 weeks after surgeryTest-retest reliability of the 6MWT in patients with lumbar degenerate disc disease, tested two consecutive times with the 6MWT App (within 3 days) before as well as after surgery.
TTFS/COMI baseline4-12 weeksCorrelation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the COMI score at baseline

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026