Skip to content

Prophylaxis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections With Calcium Sulfate Beads in Patients With Non-modifiable Risk Factors.

Application of Antibiotic Loaded Calcium Sulfate as Prophylaxis for Patients With Non Modifiable Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03976466
Acronym
Stimulan
Enrollment
87
Registered
2019-06-06
Start date
2019-05-22
Completion date
2020-07-15
Last updated
2020-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection

Keywords

Periprosthetic Joint Infection, Prophylaxis, Joint Replacement, Calcium Sulfate Beads

Brief summary

To demonstrate the prophylactic effect of calcium sulfate beads loaded with antibiotic in patients with non-modifiable risk factors that will undergo a hip or knee joint replacement, comparing with a control group. To know the economic cost generated in antibiotic prophylaxis with calcium sulfate beads in patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement with non-modifiable risk factors.

Detailed description

Since joint replacement procedures have been successful in recent decades, every year the number of implanted prostheses is increasing, however, at the same time, orthopaedic surgeons also find complications inherent to this surgery, where peri-prosthetic infection results to be the most devastating. In order to find a solution to this terrible complication, prophylactic and therapeutic measures have been implemented, emerging techniques where the application of local antibiotics in the surgical site has turned out to be a promising concept. It has been shown that the non-modifiable risk factors of patients undergoing joint replacement surgery increase the risk of infection rate. Therefore, the identification of risk factors, decolonization and the prophylactic administration of antibiotics allow an effective reduction of periprosthetic infection. In order to reduce and, as far as posible, avoid periprosthetic infections in participants undergo knee or hip joint replacement with non-modifiable risk factors, the prophylactic use of calcium sulphate loaded with antibiotic for local application is proposed.

Interventions

DEVICEAntibiotic local prophylaxis with medicated calcium sulfate beads

Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with non-modifiable risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection

PROCEDUREClassical parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with non-modifiable risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection

Sponsors

Hospital Regional Tlalnepantla
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

No participant will know during the study in which group will be assigned.

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled trial. Study participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: the experimental group receiving the Calcium sulfate beds with antibiotics and a comparison group (control) which receives a conventional prophylactic therapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with fracture or osteoarthrosis of the hip or knee that require treatment by joint replacement. * patients who have any of the Non-Modifiable Risk Factors prior to surgery or during transoperative period. * Patients entitled to the ISSEMyM (Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de Mexico y Municipios)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that lose their validity of institutional rights and do not follow up * Patients who die during the study due to other causes not related to the orthopedic procedure. * Patients who do not have any of the risk factors for periprosthetic infection * Patients allergic to vancomycin or ceftriaxone.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Partipants Achieving a Lower Hip or Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rate With Local Versus Conventional Intravenous Antibiotic Prophilaxys, Measured With CRP, ERS in Serum and Sinovial Fluid Leukocytes , Over the 12-week Observation Period.Day 5, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Acute periprosthetic knee or hip infection was determined using CRP and ESR serum biomarkers, which are the most commonly published serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infection literature. The cut off point for CRP was considered 93mg/L and 44mm/hr for ESR. The serum biomarker sample was taken and evaluated on day 5 and weeks 4, 8 and 12. Leukocytes in synovial fluid are among the criteria for definition of periprosthetic joint infection with a cut off point above 12,800 cells/µL and were only included if serum biomarkers were elevated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Stay as an Indicator of the Hospital Economic BurdenSurgical procedure day to hospital discharge.The length of stay is an important indicator of efficiency and hospital economic burden. The reduction in number of hospitalization days results in lower risk of infection and less medication side effects and decreased need of hospital supplies. The difference in the average days of hospitalization between both groups indirectly represents the economic cost spent by the hospital.

Countries

Mexico

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Inclusion critera for patients to complete enrolled protocol were: patients over 60 years old, no history of cephalosporine allergy, to have any of the non-modifiable risk factors, patients who accept blood transfusion. Patientes who are institutional entitled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Calcium Sulfate Group
Group of members that will be submitted to prophylaxis with medicated calcium sulfate beads for hip or knee joint replacement Antibiotic local prophylaxis with medicated calcium sulfate beads: Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with non-modifiable risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection
43
Control Group
Group of members that will be submitted to classic prophylaxis for hip or knee joint replacement Classical parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis: Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with non-modifiable risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection
40
Total83

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCalcium Sulfate GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Continuous75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.14
77.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
76.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Location of Joint Prosthesis
HIP
26 Participants19 Participants45 Participants
Location of Joint Prosthesis
KNEE
17 Participants21 Participants38 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Blood transfusion Transoperative Bleeding
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Body Mass Index
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Corticosteroid Therapy
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Decompensated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
History of nosocomial infection
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
History of prosthetic surgery
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Immunosuppression
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Malignancy
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Prolonged surgical time
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Rheumatoid Arthritis
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Serum Albumin
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
non-modifiable risk factors
Wound Drain, dehiscence or surgical active infecti
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Periprosthetic Joint Infection
Without periprosthetic infection
39 Participants13 Participants52 Participants
Periprosthetic Joint Infection
With periprosthetic infection
4 Participants27 Participants31 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
43 participants40 participants83 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants18 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 440 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 440 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 440 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Partipants Achieving a Lower Hip or Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rate With Local Versus Conventional Intravenous Antibiotic Prophilaxys, Measured With CRP, ERS in Serum and Sinovial Fluid Leukocytes , Over the 12-week Observation Period.

Acute periprosthetic knee or hip infection was determined using CRP and ESR serum biomarkers, which are the most commonly published serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infection literature. The cut off point for CRP was considered 93mg/L and 44mm/hr for ESR. The serum biomarker sample was taken and evaluated on day 5 and weeks 4, 8 and 12. Leukocytes in synovial fluid are among the criteria for definition of periprosthetic joint infection with a cut off point above 12,800 cells/µL and were only included if serum biomarkers were elevated.

Time frame: Day 5, Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Patients who agreed to join the study and who met the selection criteria. After 3 moths presents or not periprosthetic joint infection.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupPartipants Achieving a Lower Hip or Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rate With Local Versus Conventional Intravenous Antibiotic Prophilaxys, Measured With CRP, ERS in Serum and Sinovial Fluid Leukocytes , Over the 12-week Observation Period.With Periprosthetic Joint infection27 Participants
Control GroupPartipants Achieving a Lower Hip or Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rate With Local Versus Conventional Intravenous Antibiotic Prophilaxys, Measured With CRP, ERS in Serum and Sinovial Fluid Leukocytes , Over the 12-week Observation Period.Without periprosthetic infection13 Participants
Calcium Sulfate GroupPartipants Achieving a Lower Hip or Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rate With Local Versus Conventional Intravenous Antibiotic Prophilaxys, Measured With CRP, ERS in Serum and Sinovial Fluid Leukocytes , Over the 12-week Observation Period.With Periprosthetic Joint infection4 Participants
Calcium Sulfate GroupPartipants Achieving a Lower Hip or Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rate With Local Versus Conventional Intravenous Antibiotic Prophilaxys, Measured With CRP, ERS in Serum and Sinovial Fluid Leukocytes , Over the 12-week Observation Period.Without periprosthetic infection39 Participants
Comparison: H0.- There is no significant difference in the incidence of periprosthetic infection in patients with non-modifiable risk factors and prophylactic application of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate compared with patients without prophylactic treatment with calcium sulfate.~The presence of periprosthetic infection in both groups was evaluated by chi2 and Lambda tests for dichotomous nominal and qualitative variables with longitudinal direction and relative risk factor test.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.015, 0.168]Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Length of Stay as an Indicator of the Hospital Economic Burden

The length of stay is an important indicator of efficiency and hospital economic burden. The reduction in number of hospitalization days results in lower risk of infection and less medication side effects and decreased need of hospital supplies. The difference in the average days of hospitalization between both groups indirectly represents the economic cost spent by the hospital.

Time frame: Surgical procedure day to hospital discharge.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupLength of Stay as an Indicator of the Hospital Economic Burden15.25 DaysStandard Deviation 10.06
Calcium Sulfate GroupLength of Stay as an Indicator of the Hospital Economic Burden4.6 DaysStandard Deviation 4.62
Comparison: Lenght of stay was the variable that compares both groups and was a continous variable (t-test).p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026