Skip to content

A Study of Efruxifermin in Subjects With Histologically Confirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Efruxifermin in Subjects With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03976401
Enrollment
110
Registered
2019-06-06
Start date
2019-05-28
Completion date
2022-01-10
Last updated
2022-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Brief summary

This is a multi-center evaluation of efruxifermin (EFX) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study administered for 16 weeks in subjects with biopsy proven F1 - F4 NASH.

Interventions

DRUGEFX

Administered by subcutaneous injection

DRUGPlacebo

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Akero Therapeutics, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females between 18 - 80 years of age inclusive, based on the date of the screening visit. * Main Study only: Body mass index (BMI) \> 25 kg/m\^2 (unless the patient has biopsy-proven NASH documented within the last 2 years). * Main Study only: Must have confirmation of ≥ 10% liver fat content on magnetic resonance imaging- proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at screening. * Main Study only: Biopsy-proven NASH. Must have had a liver biopsy within 180 days of randomization with fibrosis stage 1 to 3 and a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) of ≥ 4 with at least a score of 1 in each of the following NAS components: * Steatosis (scored 0 to 3), * Ballooning degeneration (scored 0 to 2), and * Lobular inflammation (scored 0 to 3) * Cohort C only: FibroScan® measurement \> 13.1 kPa. * Cohort C only: Cirrhosis due to NASH. Liver biopsy consistent with F4 fibrosis according to the NAS system, confirmed by the central or local reader.

Exclusion criteria

* Weight gain or loss \> 5% in the 3 months prior to randomization or \> 10% in the 6 months prior to screening. * Type 1 and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes. * Poorly controlled hypertension (blood pressure \> 160/100).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Main: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.12 weeksMain study. ANCOVA multiple imputation with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Main: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.12 weeksMain study. ANCOVA multiple imputation with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.
Main: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.22-24 weeksMain study. ANCOVA multiple imputation with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.
Main: Responder: Subjects Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.12 weeksMain Study. The analyses included the treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.
Main: Responder Based on NAFLD Activity Score System (NAS): Subjects Who Had a Decrease of ≥2 Points in NAS With at Least a 1-point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage.22-24 weeksMain study: Responders were defined for subjects with ≥ 30% relative fat reduction on MRI-PDFF at Week 12 and required to return between Weeks 22 - 24. Fisher's exact test was used for the analysis using the Full Analysis Set with missing values imputed as non-responders and repeated on Liver Biopsy Evaluable Analysis Set without imputation.
Main: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.22-24 weeksMain study. Included subjects with ≥30% relative fat reduction on MRI-PDFF at Week 12 that were required to return between Weeks 22 - 24. ANCOVA model with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction as a covariate were performed.
Cohort C: Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Evaluated by FibroScan at Week 1616 weeksCohort C: ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline liver stiffness as evaluated by FibroScan® as a covariate using the Full Analysis Set. Missing values at Week 16 were imputed using the last-observed-carried-forward (LOCF) method.
Cohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.12, 16, and 20 weeksCohort C. ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline liver stiffness as evaluated by FibroScan® as a covariate using the Full Analysis Set. Missing values were imputed using the last-observed-carried-forward (LOCF) method.
Cohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Liver Fibrosis by ELF Test Score at Week 12 and 16.12 and 16 weeksCohort C. The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score describes the severity of liver fibrosis where a score of \<7.7 indicates no or mild fibrosis, a score of ≥7.7 to \<9.8 indicates moderate fibrosis, and a score of ≥9.8 indicates severe fibrosis. A change from baseline with a negative value indicates a decrease in severity of liver fibrosis. An ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline liver stiffness as evaluated by FibroScan® as a covariate using the Full Analysis Set was used. Missing values were imputed using the last-observed-carried-forward (LOCF) method.
Main: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.12, 16, and 20 weeksANCOVA model with treatment group, baseline hepatic fat fraction (\<15% vs ≥15%), and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline value as a covariate.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Main EFX 28 mg
Main Study EFX: Administered by subcutaneous injection
19
Main EFX 50 mg
Main Study EFX: Administered by subcutaneous injection
20
Main EFX 70 mg
Main Study EFX: Administered by subcutaneous injection
20
Main Placebo
Main Study Placebo: Administered by subcutaneous injection
21
Cohort C EFX 50 mg
Cohort C EFX: Administered by subcutaneous injection
20
Cohort C Placebo
Cohort C Placebo: Administered by subcutaneous injection
10
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event204110
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up120000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision001000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation010000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010001
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent000100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMain EFX 28 mgTotalCohort C PlaceboCohort C EFX 50 mgMain PlaceboMain EFX 70 mgMain EFX 50 mg
Age, Continuous50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.22
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants53 Participants5 Participants8 Participants10 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants57 Participants5 Participants12 Participants11 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants103 Participants10 Participants18 Participants19 Participants19 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 participants110 participants10 participants20 participants21 participants20 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants65 Participants3 Participants16 Participants15 Participants11 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants45 Participants7 Participants4 Participants6 Participants9 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 190 / 200 / 210 / 200 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 1917 / 1919 / 2016 / 2119 / 208 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 190 / 191 / 200 / 210 / 201 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Main: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.

Main study. ANCOVA multiple imputation with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-12.32 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 1.04
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-13.44 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 1.04
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-14.14 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 1.04
Main Study PlaceboMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-0.29 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 0.98
Secondary

Cohort C: Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Evaluated by FibroScan at Week 16

Cohort C: ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline liver stiffness as evaluated by FibroScan® as a covariate using the Full Analysis Set. Missing values at Week 16 were imputed using the last-observed-carried-forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Evaluated by FibroScan at Week 16-37.6 KPaStandard Error 8.6
Main Study EFX 50 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Evaluated by FibroScan at Week 1612.1 KPaStandard Error 12
Secondary

Cohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Liver Fibrosis by ELF Test Score at Week 12 and 16.

Cohort C. The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score describes the severity of liver fibrosis where a score of \<7.7 indicates no or mild fibrosis, a score of ≥7.7 to \<9.8 indicates moderate fibrosis, and a score of ≥9.8 indicates severe fibrosis. A change from baseline with a negative value indicates a decrease in severity of liver fibrosis. An ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline liver stiffness as evaluated by FibroScan® as a covariate using the Full Analysis Set was used. Missing values were imputed using the last-observed-carried-forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame: 12 and 16 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Liver Fibrosis by ELF Test Score at Week 12 and 16.Change from Baseline to Week 12-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Main Study EFX 28 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Liver Fibrosis by ELF Test Score at Week 12 and 16.Change from Baseline to Week 16-0.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Main Study EFX 50 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Liver Fibrosis by ELF Test Score at Week 12 and 16.Change from Baseline to Week 120.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Main Study EFX 50 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Liver Fibrosis by ELF Test Score at Week 12 and 16.Change from Baseline to Week 160.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Cohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.

Cohort C. ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline liver stiffness as evaluated by FibroScan® as a covariate using the Full Analysis Set. Missing values were imputed using the last-observed-carried-forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame: 12, 16, and 20 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 12-8.4 ug/LStandard Error 1.1
Main Study EFX 28 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 16-9.0 ug/LStandard Error 1.2
Main Study EFX 28 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 20-5.2 ug/LStandard Error 1.2
Main Study EFX 50 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 12-2.8 ug/LStandard Error 1.5
Main Study EFX 50 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 16-3.4 ug/LStandard Error 1.7
Main Study EFX 50 mgCohort C: Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Biomarkers Including Pro-C3 at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 20-4.9 ug/LStandard Error 1.7
Secondary

Main: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.

Main study. Included subjects with ≥30% relative fat reduction on MRI-PDFF at Week 12 that were required to return between Weeks 22 - 24. ANCOVA model with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction as a covariate were performed.

Time frame: 22-24 weeks

Population: Subjects from Full Analysis Set with 30% or greater reduction in hepatic fat fraction at Week 12, who returned for MRI-PDFF

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-9.50 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 1.49
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-8.99 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 1.49
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-12.72 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 1.5
Main Study PlaceboMain: Absolute Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Assessed by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-14.45 Absolute percentage of hepatic fatStandard Error 4.08
Secondary

Main: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.

ANCOVA model with treatment group, baseline hepatic fat fraction (\<15% vs ≥15%), and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: 12, 16, and 20 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 12-24.46 U/LStandard Error 3.76
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 20-17.57 U/LStandard Error 4.42
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 16-23.46 U/LStandard Error 4.87
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 12-30.47 U/LStandard Error 3.59
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 20-21.20 U/LStandard Error 4.17
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 16-31.99 U/LStandard Error 4.59
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 16-32.52 U/LStandard Error 4.65
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 12-32.29 U/LStandard Error 3.59
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 20-28.70 U/LStandard Error 4.29
Main Study PlaceboMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 12-5.94 U/LStandard Error 3.38
Main Study PlaceboMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 20-4.29 U/LStandard Error 3.96
Main Study PlaceboMain: Change From Baseline in ALT at Week 12, 16, and 20.Change from Baseline to Week 16-3.17 U/LStandard Error 4.42
Secondary

Main: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.

Main study. ANCOVA multiple imputation with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-63.21 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 5.01
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-70.92 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 4.97
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-72.26 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 5.04
Main Study PlaceboMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.-0.29 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 4.55
Secondary

Main: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.

Main study. ANCOVA multiple imputation with treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.

Time frame: 22-24 weeks

Population: Subjects from Full Analysis Set with 30% or greater reduction in hepatic fat fraction at Week 12, who returned for MRI-PDFF

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-49.80 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 7.64
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-43.37 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 7.52
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-63.70 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 7.62
Main Study PlaceboMain: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 22-24.-69.87 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 20.78
Secondary

Main: Responder Based on NAFLD Activity Score System (NAS): Subjects Who Had a Decrease of ≥2 Points in NAS With at Least a 1-point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage.

Main study: Responders were defined for subjects with ≥ 30% relative fat reduction on MRI-PDFF at Week 12 and required to return between Weeks 22 - 24. Fisher's exact test was used for the analysis using the Full Analysis Set with missing values imputed as non-responders and repeated on Liver Biopsy Evaluable Analysis Set without imputation.

Time frame: 22-24 weeks

Population: Liver Biopsy Evaluable Analysis Set (subjects from Full Analysis Set with Baseline and Week 22-24 liver biopsy results)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Responder Based on NAFLD Activity Score System (NAS): Subjects Who Had a Decrease of ≥2 Points in NAS With at Least a 1-point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage.10 Participants
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Responder Based on NAFLD Activity Score System (NAS): Subjects Who Had a Decrease of ≥2 Points in NAS With at Least a 1-point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage.10 Participants
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Responder Based on NAFLD Activity Score System (NAS): Subjects Who Had a Decrease of ≥2 Points in NAS With at Least a 1-point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage.11 Participants
Main Study PlaceboMain: Responder Based on NAFLD Activity Score System (NAS): Subjects Who Had a Decrease of ≥2 Points in NAS With at Least a 1-point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage.1 Participants
Secondary

Main: Responder: Subjects Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.

Main Study. The analyses included the treatment group and F1 fibrosis score (F1 vs F2-3) as factors and baseline hepatic fat fraction measured by MRI-PDFF as a covariate.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Main Study EFX 28 mgMain: Responder: Subjects Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.16 Participants
Main Study EFX 50 mgMain: Responder: Subjects Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.17 Participants
Main Study EFX 70 mgMain: Responder: Subjects Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.15 Participants
Main Study PlaceboMain: Responder: Subjects Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in Liver Fat Content as Measured by MRI-PDFF at Week 12.2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026