Skip to content

Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty, Radiological Features Comparing Lateral Versus Anterolateral Approach

Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty, Radiological Features Comparing Lateral Versus Anterolateral Approach: A Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03974698
Enrollment
150
Registered
2019-06-05
Start date
2014-02-01
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fractures, Hemiarthroplasty, Heterotopic Ossification

Keywords

femoral offset, leg length discrepancy, valgus/varus position, Lateral approach, Anterolateral approach

Brief summary

Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty, Radiological Features Comparing Lateral Versus Anterolateral Approach. Comparing leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, valgus/varus position of the stem. Also is there a difference in heterotopic ossification at 12 months.

Detailed description

Between January 2014 and July 2017 a RCT was conducted at Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway. The trial was approved by the regional ethics committee (2013/1853/REK) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02028468). This study is a follow-up on the same study population. 150 patients (70 to 90 years) with a displaced femoral neck fracture was randomized to be operated With either anterolateral og Direct lateral surgical approach. Investigators want to compare the radiological features of the femoral stem between the two Groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHemiarthroplasty

Radiological features comparing the femoral stem position is measured on the postoperative x-ray. Presence of heterotopic ossification is assessed on the 12 months follow up.

Sponsors

Sorlandet Hospital HF
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants attempted masked.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 70 and 90 years of age with displaced femoral neck fractures * Intact cognitive function * Ability to walk with or without a walking aid prior to falling.

Exclusion criteria

* Dementia * Fractures in pathologic bone * Patients not belonging to the hospital community * Patients with sepsis or local infection * Fracture not eligible to be treated with a hemiarthroplasty

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Leg lengthImmediately after surgeryThe perpendicular distance between a horizontal line passing through the lower edge of the teardrop to the ipsilateral center of the femoral head

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Valgus/varus stem positionImmediately after surgeryStem position in relation to the femoral axis
Femoral offsetImmediately after surgeryThe distance between the longitudinal axis of the femur to the centre of the femoral head and the distance from the centre of the femoral head to a perpendicular line passing through the medial edge of the teardrop
Heterotopic ossification1 yearClassified as type 1-4 according to Brooker classification
Canal fill ratioImmediately after surgeryWas evaluated at the following points; 2 cm above the lower trochanter, at the tip of the lower trochanter, 2 cm and 7 cm below the tip of lesser trochanter

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cortical Thickness IndexImmediately after surgerythe ratio of cortical width minus endosteal width, to cortical width at 10 cm below the tip of lesser trochanter
Dorr classificationImmediately after surgeryMorphology of the proximal femur
Canal Flare indexImmediately after surgerythe ratio of the intracortical width of the femur at 20 mm proximal to the tip of lesser trochanter and isthmus at 10 cm distally

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026