Skip to content

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Using TMS on Cerebellar Language Area for Brain Tumor Patients

Through the Navigation Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Language Key Areas of Cerebellar to Enhance Language Function Recovery After Brain Tumor Resection

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03974659
Enrollment
106
Registered
2019-06-05
Start date
2018-10-30
Completion date
2021-10-30
Last updated
2019-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebellar Function, Language Disorders, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Brief summary

At present, the incidence of language dysfunction in patients with brain language area tumor in the first month after operation was 20%-40%. The investigator's team has confirmed and found that bilateral cerebellar VIIa lobules are the critical areas of cerebellar which is closely related to the language function of the patients. This study aims at enhancing language function recovery after surgery through the transcranial magnetic stimulation stimulates the key areas of cerebellar. This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trial in which participants with postoperative aphasia in the brain-language region tumors of three neurosurgery departments, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Jing'an Center Hospital and Huashan Hospital North Hospital. Participants were randomly divided into Intervention group and control group. Before transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment, the two groups were required to conduct language behavior assessment and magnetic resonance imaging data. Participants in both groups were given 10 consecutive days bilateral cerebellar VIIa lobules Theta Burst Stimulation from one week after surgery and received speech rehabilitation training after stimulation. The investigators collect patients MRI data and language behavioral assessment scores at 1week post operation and 1 month after the operation and 3 months after the operation. Subsequently, three MRI data and language behavioral assessment scores were processed and statistically analyzed to compare the differences between the two groups

Detailed description

Intervention group: Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation(Positive stimulation) is used in right cerebellar VIIa lobule. Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation(Negative stimulation) is used in left cerebellar VIIa lobule. The stimulation intensity was 80% Rest Motor Threshold.According to the patients' condition, age and tolerance,the intensity should be adjusted. Control group: The investigators use with fake stimulation , the appearance is the same as the magnetic stimulator used in the experimental group, and the stimulation will also make sounds, but no magnetic field effect, the stimulation mode is the same as the intervention group. Subsequently, The investigators collect patients MRI data and language behavioral assessment scores at 1week post operation and 1 month after the operation and 3 months after the operation.three times MRI data and language behavioral assessment scores were processed and statistically analyzed to compare the differences between the two groups from the cerebellar spontaneous neurological activity level (ALFF), cerebellar gray matter volume, functional connectivity of cerebellar network and language behavioral score.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTTranscranial magnetic stimulation

1.Patients were given 10 consecutive days bilateral cerebellar VIIa lobules Theta Burst Stimulation which was a special mode of Transcranial magnetic stimulation from one week after surgery Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation(Positive stimulation) is used in right cerebellar VIIa lobule.Each stimulus had three 50 Hz monopulses, which were repeated every 200 ms. Each stimulation continued for 2 seconds and rested for 8 seconds. The total intervention time was 200s (600 pulses) Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation(Negative stimulation) is used in left cerebellar VIIa lobule,three 50 Hz monopulses in each stimulus, each with an interval of 200 ms, and each intervention lasted 40s (600 pulses).

Sponsors

Shanghai Jing'an Central Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Huashan Hospital North Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Huashan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Language dysfunction after brain tumor surgery (aphasia quotient,AQ)\< 93.8 * Chinese mother tongue * Right handedness confirmed by Edinburgh Handedness Scale * Tumor patients with linguistic region involvement in the dominant hemisphere * Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)\< 70 * Voluntary participation in this project

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with frequent epileptic seizures (\> 2 epilepsy episodes per week) * Previous implants of metal pacemakers, stimulators, hearing aids, dentures, and insulin pumps or claustrophobia * People with a history of psychiatric disorders * Patients with severe medical diseases * Patients with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Medical diseases * Pregnant women * Other clinical trials in the same period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Boston naming testChange from postoperative 1 week to postoperative 1month & postoperative 3 monthsThe change of Boston naming test scores is being assessed
MMSEChange from postoperative 1 week to postoperative 1month & postoperative 3 monthsThe change of Mini-mental State Examination scores is being assessed
ABCChange from postoperative 1 week to postoperative 1month & postoperative 3 monthsAphasia Battery of Chinese,Conclude naming, repeating, comprehend and spontaneous speech test,The change of ABC scores is being assessed
ALFFChange from postoperative 1 week to postoperative 1month & postoperative 3 monthsThe change of Cerebellar spontaneous neurological activity level is being assessed
Cerebellar gray matter volumeChange from postoperative 1 week to postoperative 1month & postoperative 3 monthsThe change of Cerebellar gray matter volume is being assessed
Functional connectivity of cerebellar networkChange from postoperative 1 week to postoperative 1month & postoperative 3 monthsThe change of functional connectivity of cerebellar network is being assessed

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJinsong Wu, MD
wjsongc@126.com86-021-52887200
Backup ContactTianming Qiu, MD
Tianming2100@126.com86-021-52887200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026