Stroke, Gait, Hemiplegic, Gait Disorders, Neurologic
Conditions
Keywords
rhythm, musicotherapy, balance, gait, stroke, physiotherapy
Brief summary
A rhythmic auditory stimulation intervention may be beneficial in order to improve movement parameters after stroke. Reviews argue that more randomized controlled trials with a control group are needed. Main objective: Evaluate the effect of a rhythmic auditory stimulation on the quality of balance and gait parameters in people with stroke. Methodology: quasi-experimental study. The study has been approved by the hospital ethics committee.
Detailed description
A rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) intervention may be beneficial in order to improve the parameters of the post-stroke movement: increase of the speed of the walk, improvement in the width of the step with the affected side, improvement of the walking index dynamics (Dynamic Gait Index), improvement in cadence and improvement in the static balance. Current systematic reviews argue that more randomized controlled trials with a control group are needed. Main objective: To evaluate the effect of a rhythmic auditory stimulation on the quality of progress and balance in people with stroke. Methodology: experimental group will be done between 2019 and 2020 and historical control group of the years 2017 and 2018. Experimental group will do 3 sessions in a week of RAS, and daily 2 hours of physiotherapy except of Sundays. Control group received 2 hours daily of physiotherapy, except Sundays. The study has been approved by the hospital ethics committee.
Interventions
Rhythmic auditory stimulation 3 times in a week, and 2 hours of physiotherapy 6 days in a week.
Sponsors
Hospital Sociosanitari Mutuam Girona
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Had a stroke in the last 3 weeks * Rankin 3-4 * Barthel before stroke: \>85 * Tinetti \< 23
Exclusion criteria
* Patient can walk independently (Functional Ambulation Category \>3) * Global and/or mixed aphasia * Glasgow \< 10 * Mini-Mental State Examination \< 24 * Posterior cerebral artery stroke * Gait and/or balance disorders before stroke (parkinsons disease, neurodegenerative diseases)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Balance | At baseline, 20 days after baseline and 40 days after baseline | Change in balance using the Mini Best Test |
| Gait | At baseline, 20 days after baseline and 40 days after baseline | Change in gait using the Tinetti Test |
| Gait parameters | At baseline, 20 days after baseline and 40 days after baseline | Change in step length using a measure tape |
| Gait Functionality | At baseline and 40 days after baseline | Change in gait functionality using the Functional Ambulatory Category |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed