Skip to content

Brain Function and Decision-Making

Brain Function and Decision-Making

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03974282
Enrollment
36
Registered
2019-06-04
Start date
2019-06-20
Completion date
2020-03-16
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Social, Interpersonal Relations, Psychology, Social, Social Interaction

Brief summary

This study is about how brain function and structure is different between two universities. Participant in this project will contribute to a better understanding of how universities affect the brain.

Detailed description

Some study details are purposely omitted at this time to preserve scientific integrity. Now that the study is completed, full details are included below. The true purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the two computer tasks that participants completed. Specifically, researchers wanted to know if they would be able to accurately measure motivated empathy. To better understand this, participants were asked to rate images of people expressing pain and were told that these were either students from their university or students from a different university. This was not the case. The faces shown were random images produced for a research study. Researchers also wanted to know if they could accurately measure moral decision making and how those judgments relate to aggression. To examine this, participants were asked whether various scenarios were immoral and then asked about aggressive tendencies.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPsychological task

Participants will complete a psychological task that evokes antisocially- and prosocially-motivated empathic responding

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Undergraduate students aged 18 - 35 years of age * No current or regular use of prescribed or illicit psychoactive drugs * Free of major health problems (e.g., diabetes, HIV, Parkinson's disease) * Free of a neurological or psychiatric disorders * No current drug abuse (e.g., recreational drug use, average alcohol intake in excess of 4 drinks per day). * Right hand dominant * Free of claustrophobia * Free of pregnancy or suspected pregnancy * Absent MRI risk factors (e.g., implanted medical device, body mass index \> 35, braces) * Free of medical conditions that render individuals with overly sensitive hearing * No colorblindness

Exclusion criteria

• Not meeting the inclusion criteria listed above.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activity Assessed by fMRIBaseline to 3 hoursBlood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent signal change in the cognitive empathy brain network will be assessed using functional MRI
Change in Accuracy of Empathic Pain JudgmentsBaseline to 3 hoursDifference in pain judgment scores rated from 1 (low) to 4 (high) between antisocial vs prosocial empathy trials

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Psychopathy Distribution
Participants who score at the low end of the psychopathy distribution
18
High Psychopathy Distribution
Participants who score at the high end of the psychopathy distribution
18
Total36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow Psychopathy DistributionTotalHigh Psychopathy Distribution
Age, Continuous20.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
20.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43
20.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.12
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African-American
5 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Missing Data
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Multiracial
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other Race
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White - Hispanic
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White - Non-Hispanic
2 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants36 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants36 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Accuracy of Empathic Pain Judgments

Difference in pain judgment scores rated from 1 (low) to 4 (high) between antisocial vs prosocial empathy trials

Time frame: Baseline to 3 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Psychopathy DistributionChange in Accuracy of Empathic Pain Judgments.49 difference in pain scoresStandard Deviation 0.14
High Psychopathy DistributionChange in Accuracy of Empathic Pain Judgments.39 difference in pain scoresStandard Deviation 0.14
Primary

Change in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activity Assessed by fMRI

Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent signal change in the cognitive empathy brain network will be assessed using functional MRI

Time frame: Baseline to 3 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Psychopathy DistributionChange in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activity Assessed by fMRI-0.002 Percent BOLD Signal ChangeStandard Deviation 0.163
High Psychopathy DistributionChange in Prefrontal Cortex Brain Activity Assessed by fMRI0.015 Percent BOLD Signal ChangeStandard Deviation 0.105

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026