Cardiovascular Diseases, Health Literacy
Conditions
Keywords
Health literacy, East Jerusalem, Focus groups, Arabic Women
Brief summary
This is a two-stage study: The objective of the first stage is to explore health literacy (HL) needs and preferences of Arab women through conducting Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). The second stage will employ conducting a HL intervention tailored to the participants' needs and preferences as presented in the FGDs. Objectives include increasing the percentage of women who utilize patient-doctor communication skills and increasing their cardiovascular disease (CVD) knowledge.The intervention consists of four sessions that will be conducted in municipality-sponsored women's groups in Jerusalem and other Arab communities. Questionnaires will be completed before and three months after the intervention. The study answers the following: Can HL workshops improve patient-doctor communication skills and CVD knowledge in Arab women.
Detailed description
Arab women in Israel are at high risk of low health literacy due to lower levels of education and low socio-economic status. Health literacy (HL) refers to the skills and competencies enabling people to obtain and interpret health information and apply their knowledge to inform health-related decision-making. It's also defined as the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, understand, and process basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions. The objective of the first stage of the study is to explore health literacy needs and preferences of Arab women through conducting Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with women in East Jerusalem. Six different focus groups will be conducted at three of the six municipality community centers in East Jerusalem. Participants will be recruited through identified community centers. Each group will meet once for up to two hours. The study will be explained to them by an investigator who has been trained in the administration of focus groups, and they will be asked to sign a consent form. Discussions will be recorded without the names of the participants (they will be instructed not to use their names once the recording begins). At the end of the meeting, each participant will receive a bag and pamphlets with information regarding women's health. The second stage will employ conducting a HL intervention tailored to the participants' needs and preferences as presented in the FGDs. Objectives include increasing the percentage of women who utilize patient-doctor communication skills and increasing their cardiovascular disease (CVD) knowledge.The intervention consists of four sessions that will be conducted in municipality-sponsored women's groups in Jerusalem and other Arab communities. Questionnaires will be completed before and three months after the intervention. The study answers the following: Can HL workshops improve patient-doctor communication skills and CVD knowledge in Arab women.
Interventions
OTHERHeath literacy assessment in Arab women in East Jerusalem
A 4-sessions intervention to increase the participant's self-efficacy when interacting with their physician and increase their cardiovascular health knowledge.
Sponsors
Hadassah Medical Organization
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
A 4-sessions workshop to improve health literacy among Arab women in Israel, with pre-post evaluation.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* All women aged 18-85 that attend and participate in the community's women's groups * They must speak Arabic
Exclusion criteria
* Not in the age range of 18-85. * Do not speak Arabic.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in preparation for doctor's visit | At baseline and three months after intervention | A 6-item questionnaire represents preferred actions that participant\\pants do before their doctor appointment. The more items are selected, the higher the score is, hence representing a positive outcome. |
| Change in remembering doctor's recommendations and reading blood test results | At baseline and three months after intervention | A 2-item version derived from the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interaction (PEPPI). Participants respond to each question on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 representing very confident,'' and 1 representing not at all confident. Higher scores represent positive outcome. |
| change in health literacy | At baseline and three months after intervention | Will be assessed using the Health Literacy Survey-Europe-Q16 (HLS-EU-Q16) a 16 question research instrument adapted for use in Israel. Participants respond to each question on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 representing fairly easy,'' and 1 representing very difficult. Higher scores represent positive outcome. |
| assessment of health literacy level and elucidate factors that will improve health literacy (barriers, incentives, etc.…) among Arab women in East Jerusalem | within 6 months | The assessment will be done through conduction of focus groups. Focus groups will be audio- recorded, transcribed and analyzed using Systematic text condensation, a descriptive and explorative analysis strategy. Which consists of four steps: 1) total impression - from chaos to themes; 2) identifying and sorting meanings units - from themes to codes; 3) condensation - from code to meaning; 4) synthesizing - from condensation to descriptions and concepts. It is expected that six focus groups will be sufficient to achieve saturation of themes. If results are not sufficient, investigators will ask to increase the number of focus groups. |
| Change in cardiovascular disease knowledge | At baseline and three months after intervention | A self report questionnaire based on the American Heart Association's Cardiovascular, and assess the knowledge regarding heart attack symptoms, by answering yes/no to each item. |
| Change in perceived efficacy in patient-physician interaction | At baseline and three months after intervention | Will be assessed using the 10-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interaction (PEPPI) (Maly, Frank, Marshall, Diametteo, Reuben, 1998). Participants respond to each question on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing very confident,'' and 1 representing not at all confident. Higher scores represent positive outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in perceived efficacy in reading and understanding the instruction for taking medications | At baseline and three months after intervention | Participants will be asked how confident do you feel you are able to follow the instructions on the label of a medication bottle? |
| Change in Self-Rated Status of Health (SRH) | At baseline and three months after intervention | A validated single item health measure in which participants rate the current status of their own health on a five-point scale, from excellent to poor |
Countries
Israel
Outcome results
None listed