Skip to content

Effects of Genotype on Resting State Connectivity During Methamphetamine Administration

Effects of Genotype on Resting State Connectivity During Methamphetamine Administration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03973489
Acronym
MATAAR
Enrollment
69
Registered
2019-06-04
Start date
2019-08-16
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2024-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Methamphetamine-dependence

Keywords

Methamphetamine

Brief summary

Addiction to methamphetamine (MA) is a serious health problem in the United States. Right now, there are no medically approved treatments for MA dependence. More research is needed to understand how MA affects the brain and to eventually develop medical interventions for MA addiction. The purpose of the study is to learn more about how MA use affects the brain by investigating a receptor in the brain called trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1). The investigators are hoping to find out if individuals with certain versions of the brain receptor react differently when given MA. The TAAR1 receptor has two prevalent genetic variations due to a single nucleotide polymorphism. These are the wild type (WT) and a common variant (CV). Preliminary studies have shown that these variants produce different connectivity (resting state functional connectivity or RSFC) in the brains of individuals with MA use disorder (MUD), specifically that individuals with the CV genotype exhibit lower RSFC than WT. In this study, MA will be administered to individuals with MA use disorder and healthy controls in order to: 1. Determine the influence of CV vs. WT genotype on RSFC and craving in individuals with chronic MUD and healthy controls. 2. Determine the effect of acute methamphetamine or placebo administration on the interaction of CV vs WT genotype on RSFC, craving, cognitive control, attention and subjective experience in MUD and healthy controls.

Detailed description

This proposal will determine the effect of a common variant (CV) synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the gene for the human trace amine associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) on the neural and behavioral response of subjects with methamphetamine (MA) use disorder (MUD) and healthy control subjects to acute MA administration. The SNP (rs8192620 on human Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 patch release 7 chromosome 6 at 132,645,140 bp in htaar1, allelic frequency 22%) results from a change of adenine to guanine in a valine codon occurring at amino acid position 288 (V288V). MA is a potent agonist at the TAAR1 receptor, in addition to its actions at the dopamine transporter and the vesicular monoamine transporter. In rodents, a decrease in TAAR1 expression or non-functional TAAR1 receptor is associated with an increase in striatal dopamine (DA) signaling. The scientific premise of this project is based on 1) preliminary findings that support a model that the CV alters RSFC of the striatum, a dopaminergic terminal region, and associated behavior in chronic MUD, 2) published reports that delineate the effect of TAAR1 on DA signaling and 3) preclinical evidence that TAAR1 influences sensitivity to rewarding and aversive effects of MA. Furthermore, this proposal will address questions that have important implications for understanding and treating patients with MUD, as the TAAR1 receptor is implicated in MA self-administration. As an allele of the murine TAAR1 gene associated with an inactive receptor leads to increased MA intake in homozygotes, it is critically important to study the feasibility of exploiting human variant htaar1. The investigators propose a model based on this premise that makes testable predictions about the interaction of the CV with chronic and acute MA administration in MUD. The investigators' preliminary data show that the CV causes over-expression of TAAR1 in cell culture. Stimulation of the TAAR1 receptor decreases dopaminergic signaling in mesocorticolimbic and corticostriatal networks. The investigators propose that this effect in conjunction with chronic MA use causes neuroadaptations that result in the increased striato- and corticolimbic RSFC as well as increased drug craving observed in MUD subjects with the CV. The investigators can indirectly test the hypothesis of decreased DA release due to ever-expression via MA administration. The effect of acute MA administration on RSFC in humans is not known but acute administration of S-amphetamine and methylphenidate reduce RSFC in salience attribution and default mode networks presumably via increased DA release. Stimulation of over-expressed TAAR1 should blunt this effect in CV carrying individuals compared to WT. There are no published reports on neural effects of the interaction between either chronic or acute MA administration and htaar1 genotype in humans, therefore this proposal represents a unique opportunity to determine whether the RSFC response to acute MA administration in humans is mediated by genotype.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

On visits 2 and 3, subjects will undergo a baseline MRI scan approximately 1 hour after the start of each visit followed by drug administration (placebo or MA) and a second scan 1.5 hours after that.

DRUGMethamphetamine Hydrochloride Tablets

Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits. Participants will receive the following doses of methamphetamine hydrochloride in accordance with their weight: if weight is between 50-60 kg, 15 mg dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride will be administered. Similarly, for 60-80 kg, 20 mg dose; 80-100 kg, 25 mg dose; and 100+ kg, 30 mg dose.

DRUGPlacebo oral tablet

Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits.

Sponsors

Portland VA Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Subjects will be grouped into either the CV or WT group. Neither they nor the researchers will know which group they are in. In addition, subjects will be randomly assigned to receive drug then placebo or placebo than drug. Neither researchers or subjects will know in which order they will receive drug.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Criteria for Inclusion: \[All groups\] * 18 to 55 years old * Homozygous or heterozygous for the human TAAR1 (hTAAR1) V288V genotype or wild type for hTAAR1 (determined during screening visit Visit 1) \[Meth use group\] * Subjects must have a positive urine drug screen for methamphetamine during visit one * Meets current criteria for methamphetamine use disorder * Subjects should have been using at least 100mg of methamphetamine (not prescribed), 5 days per week for at least one year * Abstinent from methamphetamine for 24 hours on days of scans \[Healthy volunteer group\] \- At least one exposure to a stimulant, either recreational or prescribed Criteria for Exclusion: \[All groups\] * Allergies to stimulants or hypersensitivity to taking a stimulant in the past * Diagnosis of a psychotic or mood disorder * Self-reported claustrophobia * Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Intoxicated on study days * Clinically significant neurological, cardiovascular, endocrine, renal, hepatic or systemic disease that could compromise safe participation or confound outcomes (including hepatitis C, HIV, severe anemia, or liver disease) * History of glaucoma * Metal in the body which is contraindicated for MRI or would compromise image quality * Current prescription use of stimulants, anti-psychotic drugs or anti-Parkinson's drugs * Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days * Use of serotonin reuptake inhibiters, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibiters, triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, Fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone , St. John's Wort, insulin, phenothiazines, guanethidine, acidifying/alkalinizing agents, CYP2D6 inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors \[Meth use group\] * Positive urine drug screen at any point during the study (except for meth or marijuana) * History of any severe substance use disorders within the last 5 years, except for methamphetamine use disorder or tobacco use disorder \[Healthy volunteer group\] * History of any severe substance use disorders within the last 5 years except tobacco use disorder * Positive urine drug screen at any point in the study (except for marijuana or for verified medical reasons)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)1 hour prior to and 1.5 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to calculate cortico-striatal and intra-striatal functional connectivity during resting state. These r values were then converted into Fisher's Z-scores using the transformation: z = arctanh(r) = 0.5\*ln((1+r)/(1-r)). Fisher's Z-transformation linearizes Pearson correlations and allows for statistical analysis. The Z-scores represent the strength and direction of functional connectivity between brain regions. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean for functional connectivity between brain regions. Larger Z-scores indicate stronger connectivity (potentially indicating greater activation or association), while smaller (negative) Z-scores indicate weaker connectivity, which could suggest reduced synchronization or disrupted brain function. Z-scores above or below ±1 standard deviation from the mean may indicate notable deviations from the expected connectivity patterns in the population.
Euphoria Effects of Study Drug2.5 hours prior to and between 1-4 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)The Morphine Benzedrine group (MBG) scale is a subscale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI-49), a 49 item questionnaire consisting of true/false items, which measures the euphoric effects of the study drug. The MBG scale ranges from 0-16 with higher numbers indicating more euphoria. The questionnaire was administered every hour for four hours following study drug administration and the highest score during this time is considered the post drug administration score.
Craving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)2 hours prior to and 3 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)Current craving for methamphetamine was assessed using the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ), which is a 10-item self-report measure that uses a seven-point scale, with answers ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). A composite score was computed by averaging the responses for all 10 items after reverse scoring items 4 and 7. Scores range from 0 to 6 with higher scores representing higher craving for methamphetamine.
Cognitive Function2 hours prior to and 3 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)Two computer tests were administered to measure how each medication intervention effects cognitive functioning. The tests administered included the Rapid Visual Information Processing Task (RVIPT), a 6 minute test of sustained attention in which participants are requested to detect target sequences of digits and the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), a 2 minute test of psychomotor speed and sustained attention consisting of digit-symbol pairs followed by a list of digits where the subject identifies the symbol that corresponds to each digit as fast as possible. The number of correct responses within the allowed time is measured. Higher scores on both tasks indicate better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Methamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)2.5 hours prior to and 3 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)Saliva samples were acquired to test concentration of methamphetamine levels

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Wild Type (WT) MUD Group
Wild Type (WT) Group: individuals who are WT for the TAAR1 gene Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): On visits 2 and 3, subjects will undergo a baseline MRI scan approximately 1 hour after the start of each visit followed by drug administration (placebo or MA) and a second scan 1.5 hours after that. Methamphetamine Hydrochloride Tablets: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits. Participants will receive the following doses of methamphetamine hydrochloride in accordance with their weight: if weight is between 50-60 kg, 15 mg dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride will be administered. Similarly, for 60-80 kg, 20 mg dose; 80-100 kg, 25 mg dose; and 100+ kg, 30 mg dose. Placebo oral tablet: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits.
7
Common Variant (CV) MUD Group
Common Variant (CV) Group: individuals who are hetero-or homozygous for the V288V SNP on the TAAR1 gene Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): On visits 2 and 3, subjects will undergo a baseline MRI scan approximately 1 hour after the start of each visit followed by drug administration (placebo or MA) and a second scan 1.5 hours after that. Methamphetamine Hydrochloride Tablets: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits. Participants will receive the following doses of methamphetamine hydrochloride in accordance with their weight: if weight is between 50-60 kg, 15 mg dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride will be administered. Similarly, for 60-80 kg, 20 mg dose; 80-100 kg, 25 mg dose; and 100+ kg, 30 mg dose. Placebo oral tablet: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits.
7
Wild Type (WT) Healthy Control Group
Wild Type (WT) Group: individuals who are WT for the TAAR1 gene Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): On visits 2 and 3, subjects will undergo a baseline MRI scan approximately 1 hour after the start of each visit followed by drug administration (placebo or MA) and a second scan 1.5 hours after that. Methamphetamine Hydrochloride Tablets: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits. Participants will receive the following doses of methamphetamine hydrochloride in accordance with their weight: if weight is between 50-60 kg, 15 mg dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride will be administered. Similarly, for 60-80 kg, 20 mg dose; 80-100 kg, 25 mg dose; and 100+ kg, 30 mg dose. Placebo oral tablet: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits.
8
Common Variant (CV) Healthy Control Group
Common Variant (CV) Group: individuals who are hetero-or homozygous for the V288V SNP on the TAAR1 gene Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): On visits 2 and 3, subjects will undergo a baseline MRI scan approximately 1 hour after the start of each visit followed by drug administration (placebo or MA) and a second scan 1.5 hours after that. Methamphetamine Hydrochloride Tablets: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits. Participants will receive the following doses of methamphetamine hydrochloride in accordance with their weight: if weight is between 50-60 kg, 15 mg dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride will be administered. Similarly, for 60-80 kg, 20 mg dose; 80-100 kg, 25 mg dose; and 100+ kg, 30 mg dose. Placebo oral tablet: Study participants will receive an oral dose of methamphetamine hydrochloride on one of two scan days and an identical looking placebo in tablet form on the other scan day. Drug type will be randomized between the two visits.
4
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Second Intervention (1 Day)Adverse Event00010000
Washout Period (at Least 3 Days)Lost to Follow-up10001000
Washout Period (at Least 3 Days)Physician Decision00001010
Washout Period (at Least 3 Days)Too much motion in scanner10010000
Washout Period (at Least 3 Days)Withdrawal by Subject00011000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWild Type (WT) MUD GroupCommon Variant (CV) MUD GroupWild Type (WT) Healthy Control GroupCommon Variant (CV) Healthy Control GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants7 Participants8 Participants4 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants8 Participants4 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants4 Participants6 Participants4 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 246 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Cognitive Function

Two computer tests were administered to measure how each medication intervention effects cognitive functioning. The tests administered included the Rapid Visual Information Processing Task (RVIPT), a 6 minute test of sustained attention in which participants are requested to detect target sequences of digits and the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), a 2 minute test of psychomotor speed and sustained attention consisting of digit-symbol pairs followed by a list of digits where the subject identifies the symbol that corresponds to each digit as fast as possible. The number of correct responses within the allowed time is measured. Higher scores on both tasks indicate better performance.

Time frame: 2 hours prior to and 3 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)

Population: Participants were excluded from further analyses if they did not complete pre and post imaging measures during visit. Placebo and methamphetamine administration include individuals who completed the respective visit at either the first or second intervention. One participant (MUD, CV, post placebo administration) did not complete the final set of data but did complete both imaging measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP24.0 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 4.4
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST42.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 11.1
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST44.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 23.3
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP29.7 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 8.4
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST50.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 3.7
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP29.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 5.7
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST53.2 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 6.1
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP34.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 11.5
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP27.5 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 13.2
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST42.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 17.2
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP33.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 9.5
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST42.5 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 9.8
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST42.9 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 9.3
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP31.9 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 10
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP34.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 7.5
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST44.7 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 8.8
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST63.7 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 8.1
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP28.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 4.2
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST57.0 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 1
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP31.7 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 8.1
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP37.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 9.3
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST47.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 9.1
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST60.4 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 15.4
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP39.6 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 11.4
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP27.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 7.8
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST75.8 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 16.7
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST68.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 10
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP38.3 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 5.7
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST61.0 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 9.7
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP35.5 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 14.1
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionDSST59.9 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 13.1
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCognitive FunctionRVIP42.6 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 12.3
Primary

Craving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)

Current craving for methamphetamine was assessed using the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ), which is a 10-item self-report measure that uses a seven-point scale, with answers ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). A composite score was computed by averaging the responses for all 10 items after reverse scoring items 4 and 7. Scores range from 0 to 6 with higher scores representing higher craving for methamphetamine.

Time frame: 2 hours prior to and 3 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)

Population: Participants were excluded from further analyses if they did not complete pre and post imaging measures during visit. Placebo and methamphetamine administration include individuals who completed the respective visit at either the first or second intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationCraving Assessed With the Stimulant Craving Questionnaire (STCQ)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Euphoria Effects of Study Drug

The Morphine Benzedrine group (MBG) scale is a subscale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI-49), a 49 item questionnaire consisting of true/false items, which measures the euphoric effects of the study drug. The MBG scale ranges from 0-16 with higher numbers indicating more euphoria. The questionnaire was administered every hour for four hours following study drug administration and the highest score during this time is considered the post drug administration score.

Time frame: 2.5 hours prior to and between 1-4 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)

Population: Participants were excluded from further analyses if they did not complete all pre and post imaging measures during visit. Placebo and methamphetamine administration include individuals who completed the respective visit at either the first or second intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug8.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationEuphoria Effects of Study Drug10.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Primary

Functional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to calculate cortico-striatal and intra-striatal functional connectivity during resting state. These r values were then converted into Fisher's Z-scores using the transformation: z = arctanh(r) = 0.5\*ln((1+r)/(1-r)). Fisher's Z-transformation linearizes Pearson correlations and allows for statistical analysis. The Z-scores represent the strength and direction of functional connectivity between brain regions. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean for functional connectivity between brain regions. Larger Z-scores indicate stronger connectivity (potentially indicating greater activation or association), while smaller (negative) Z-scores indicate weaker connectivity, which could suggest reduced synchronization or disrupted brain function. Z-scores above or below ±1 standard deviation from the mean may indicate notable deviations from the expected connectivity patterns in the population.

Time frame: 1 hour prior to and 1.5 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)

Population: Participants were excluded from further analyses if they did not complete pre and post imaging outcome measures during visit. Placebo and methamphetamine administration include individuals who completed the respective visit at either the first or second intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.91 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.96
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.36 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.06
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.3 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.52 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.29
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.54 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.5
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.25 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.15
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.20 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.14
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.32 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.14
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.19 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.11
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.34 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.22
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.25 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.1
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.49 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.29
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.21 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.33
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.23 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.84
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.58 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.36
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.10 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.08
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.09 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.04
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.25 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.81
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.24 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.18
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.14 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.15
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.35 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.14
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.18 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.15 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.1
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.31 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.192 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.142 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.101 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.56
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.19 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.32
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.010 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.1
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.26 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.16
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Intra-striatal0.17 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.21
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationFunctional Connectivity During Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Cortico striatal0.164 Fisher's Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Methamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)

Saliva samples were acquired to test concentration of methamphetamine levels

Time frame: 2.5 hours prior to and 3 hours post study drug administration on visits 2 and visit 3 (randomized to placebo or methamphetamine; washout period between visit 2 and 3 was at least 3 days)

Population: Participants were excluded from further analyses if they did not complete all pre and post outcome measures during visit. Placebo and methamphetamine administration include individuals who completed the respective visit at either the first or second intervention. One participant (MUD, CV, post placebo administration) did not complete the final set of data but did complete both imaging measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)5320 ng/mlStandard Deviation 4794
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)3750 ng/mlStandard Deviation 3408
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)3328 ng/mlStandard Deviation 3327
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)1827 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1032
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)2828 ng/mlStandard Deviation 1539
MUD Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)3140 ng/mlStandard Deviation 3289
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)6067 ng/mlStandard Deviation 8015
MUD Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)3984 ng/mlStandard Deviation 3994
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Placebo AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, CV Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, CV Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)467 ng/mlStandard Deviation 296
HC Group, WT Genotype, Pre Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
HC Group, WT Genotype, Post Methamphetamine AdministrationMethamphetamine Concentration in Saliva (ng/ml)253 ng/mlStandard Deviation 101

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026