Skip to content

Neuroendocrine Risk for PTSD in Women

The LOW E2 STUDY- Neuroendocrine Risk Mechanisms for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Women

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03973229
Enrollment
127
Registered
2019-06-04
Start date
2019-11-11
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2026-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PTSD, Trauma

Keywords

Estrogen, Stress Disorder

Brief summary

This study will test for effects of estradiol (E2) on PTSD symptoms and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) indicators of stress vulnerability, in naturally-cycling women who are not using hormonal birth control. Enrollment will be targeted to create three groups within two cohorts (early follicular phase and luteal phase): 1. PTSD: Women who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for PTSD 2. Trauma-Exposed (TC): Women matched for age and trauma exposure severity but without PTSD 3. Healthy Control (HC): Women matched for age, but without trauma history or psychiatric disorder (self-reported) Women will be recruited through Grady Trauma Project (GTP), a large longstanding study of civilian trauma and PTSD conducted at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia.

Detailed description

The majority of Americans will experience a traumatic event during their lifetimes. However, women are twice as likely as men to experience negative psychiatric outcomes following trauma, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. The reason for the increased prevalence in women is unclear, partially because of the historical lack of investigation of females in both human and pre-clinical animal research. The researchers propose to investigate the role of sex hormones in contributing to women's risk for PTSD. The study will investigate relationships between trauma exposure and women's menstrual cycle, examining key events in the cycle, including menstruation, ovulation, and mood changes. The study will then examine relationships between the level of naturally-cycling estradiol (E2; the primary female sex hormone), and brain-based measures of stress vulnerability. This includes amygdala hyper-reactivity to threat. The trial will study if trauma-exposed women with lower E2 levels during the luteal phase will report greater PTSD symptoms, and show more stress-vulnerable patterns of brain function. It will also examine the effects of exogenous application of estrogen on PTSD symptoms. Women will begin tracking their cycle using a free and widely-used cycle-tracking smartphone app "Clue" for one full menstrual cycle. * For Study Aims 1 & 2 (N=120): Participants will be contacted on the first day of their menstrual period in the second cycle, and scheduled for an MRI with a 4-day window (early follicular phase). Participants will be randomized to begin with either the E2 or placebo patch. The will receive an E2 or placebo patch 1 day prior to the MRI visit, with a blood draw on the morning of the MRI visit (to assess hormone levels), 1 hour prior to scanning. On the first day of the third cycle (onset of menses), women will all be scheduled for their second MRI visit. Participants will experience the opposite condition from their first MRI scan. They will receive an E2 or placebo patch 1 day prior to the MRI visit in the afternoon, with a blood draw on the morning of the MRI visit, 1 hour prior to scanning. * For Study Aim 3 (N=120): Participants will begin daily urine ovulation tests on Day 11 of their cycle, and will record the results in Clue. When participants record a positive ovulation test during the second month of cycle monitoring, they will be contacted to schedule their MRI visit 5-7 days following ovulation (during the luteal phase). The experimental protocol will otherwise be the same as in Aims 1 and 2, with participants randomized to either E2 or placebo at the first visit and returning the next month for the other condition. The scientific premise of this study is that low E2 may contribute to stress vulnerability in women. Findings may aid in the development of treatments that will enhance women's mental health outcomes following trauma.

Interventions

Estradiol (E2) patches at a dose of 100ug will be applied 24-48 hours before the MRI scan is performed.

OTHERPlacebo patch

Placebo patch identical to the estradiol patch will be applied 24-48 hours before the MRI scan is performed.

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Randomization will be double blind, with the key held by the study coordinator in a locked file. The study coordinator will do checks of appropriate enrollment to groups after each 20 participants, but no blind will be broken to individuals analyzing study data. Grady pharmacy services will also hold the randomization schedule, as they will dispense the appropriate patch at the appropriate time point.

Intervention model description

Women will participate in one cycle with the estrogen patch and one cycle with the placebo patch. Each cohort will include 40 participants in each of the three study arms for a total of 240 participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* African American women * A menstrual period within the past 60 days * Able and willing to give informed consent * Must have a smart phone and willing to install the Clue app

Exclusion criteria

* Women currently taking any form of hormone-based birth control or other hormonal supplement * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Current psychoactive medication use * Nicotine use or smoking * Hypercoagulable conditions * History of embolism * Current symptoms of psychosis or bipolar disorder * History of major head injury or neurological disorder * Weight \>250lbs (a maximum weight to allow for participants to fit comfortably inside the bore of the MRI machine) and typical physical contraindications for MRI such as metal implants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amygdala Response to Fearful Faces StimuliEarly-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days)Responses to threat cues are assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses as participants view 15 blocks each of fearful face and neutral face stimuli, while amygdala reactivity is measured. The amygdala is separated in the right and left hemispheres, and subdivided into the basolateral amygdala and central amygdala. Across voxels in each region a contrast estimate of Fearful \> Neutral faces was extracted. The contrast estimate is a standard reporting format for task-based fMRI data, and reflects the magnitude of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activation difference between two experimental conditions. Contrast estimates are an arbitrary, unitless comparison of fMRI BOLD signal units of one experimental condition versus another (threat vs. neutral stimuli). Higher values indicate greater amygdala reactivity to threat cues (vs. neutral cues), a PTSD-linked response pattern. Negative values indicate stronger amygdala reactivity to neutral cues than threat cues.
Amygdala Response to Fear Conditioning TaskEarly-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days)Indicators of fear conditioning are assessed by fMRI during the fear conditioning tasks. Deficits in fear inhibition have been present in persons with PTSD and during phases of the ovarian cycle. The amygdala is subdivided into the basolateral amygdala and central amygdala. Across voxels in each region a contrast estimate of conditioned stimulation (CS)+ (conditioned threat cues) \> CS- (conditioned safety cues) was extracted. The contrast estimate reflects the magnitude of BOLD activation difference between two experimental conditions. Contrast estimates are an arbitrary, unitless comparison of fMRI BOLD signal units of one experimental condition versus another. Positive values indicate strong responsivity to conditioned threats, which could indicate either fear- or memory-related responses. Strong positive values indicate high responsivity to the conditioned threat (CS+), a pattern often associated with PTSD. Negative values indicate greater responsivity to safety cues (CS-).
Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (vmPFC) Activation During the Fear Extinction TaskEarly-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days)Indicators of fear extinction are assessed by fMRI during the fear extinction tasks. Fear extinction is impaired in persons with PTSD and depends on the vmPFC and its inhibition of amygdala responses to threat stimuli. The vmPFC region is defined using the anatomical boundaries of Brodmann area 25 (BA25). Across voxels in this region, a mean contrast estimate of CS+ \> CS- in late extinction was extracted. The contrast estimate reflects the magnitude of BOLD activation difference between experimental conditions. Contrast estimates are a unitless comparison of fMRI BOLD signal units of one experimental condition versus another. These values indicate responsivity to conditioned threats. For the vmPFC, a positive value often indicates regulation of emotion or fear now that the threat cues have been extinguished. Strong positive values indicate higher engagement of this region to the conditioned threat (CS+). Negative values indicate higher engagement of this region to safety cues (CS-).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5)Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days)The severity of self-reported PTSD symptoms will be assessed with the PCL-5. The PCL-5 asks participants to recall the worst stressful event that is currently bothering them the most. Keeping this event in mind, participants respond to 20 questions indicating how bothered they have been by PTSD symptoms. Responses are on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not bothered at all and 4 = extremely bothered. Total raw scores range from 0 to 80 where higher scores indicate greater distress from PTSD symptoms.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days)The BDI-II is a 21-item instrument assessing depression. Respondents indicate how severe their feelings of depression symptoms are on a scale of 0 (not present) to 3 (most severe). Total raw scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJennifer Stevens, PhD

Emory University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital clinics in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began November 11, 2019 and the final study assessment occurred on April 30, 2025.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous25.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
124 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 190 / 220 / 210 / 200 / 210 / 140 / 180 / 180 / 190 / 180 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 213 / 196 / 224 / 214 / 205 / 213 / 147 / 181 / 180 / 192 / 182 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 190 / 220 / 210 / 200 / 210 / 140 / 180 / 180 / 190 / 180 / 16

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026