PTSD, Trauma
Conditions
Keywords
Estrogen, Stress Disorder
Brief summary
This study will test for effects of estradiol (E2) on PTSD symptoms and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) indicators of stress vulnerability, in naturally-cycling women who are not using hormonal birth control. Enrollment will be targeted to create three groups within two cohorts (early follicular phase and luteal phase): 1. PTSD: Women who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for PTSD 2. Trauma-Exposed (TC): Women matched for age and trauma exposure severity but without PTSD 3. Healthy Control (HC): Women matched for age, but without trauma history or psychiatric disorder (self-reported) Women will be recruited through Grady Trauma Project (GTP), a large longstanding study of civilian trauma and PTSD conducted at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia.
Detailed description
The majority of Americans will experience a traumatic event during their lifetimes. However, women are twice as likely as men to experience negative psychiatric outcomes following trauma, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. The reason for the increased prevalence in women is unclear, partially because of the historical lack of investigation of females in both human and pre-clinical animal research. The researchers propose to investigate the role of sex hormones in contributing to women's risk for PTSD. The study will investigate relationships between trauma exposure and women's menstrual cycle, examining key events in the cycle, including menstruation, ovulation, and mood changes. The study will then examine relationships between the level of naturally-cycling estradiol (E2; the primary female sex hormone), and brain-based measures of stress vulnerability. This includes amygdala hyper-reactivity to threat. The trial will study if trauma-exposed women with lower E2 levels during the luteal phase will report greater PTSD symptoms, and show more stress-vulnerable patterns of brain function. It will also examine the effects of exogenous application of estrogen on PTSD symptoms. Women will begin tracking their cycle using a free and widely-used cycle-tracking smartphone app "Clue" for one full menstrual cycle. * For Study Aims 1 & 2 (N=120): Participants will be contacted on the first day of their menstrual period in the second cycle, and scheduled for an MRI with a 4-day window (early follicular phase). Participants will be randomized to begin with either the E2 or placebo patch. The will receive an E2 or placebo patch 1 day prior to the MRI visit, with a blood draw on the morning of the MRI visit (to assess hormone levels), 1 hour prior to scanning. On the first day of the third cycle (onset of menses), women will all be scheduled for their second MRI visit. Participants will experience the opposite condition from their first MRI scan. They will receive an E2 or placebo patch 1 day prior to the MRI visit in the afternoon, with a blood draw on the morning of the MRI visit, 1 hour prior to scanning. * For Study Aim 3 (N=120): Participants will begin daily urine ovulation tests on Day 11 of their cycle, and will record the results in Clue. When participants record a positive ovulation test during the second month of cycle monitoring, they will be contacted to schedule their MRI visit 5-7 days following ovulation (during the luteal phase). The experimental protocol will otherwise be the same as in Aims 1 and 2, with participants randomized to either E2 or placebo at the first visit and returning the next month for the other condition. The scientific premise of this study is that low E2 may contribute to stress vulnerability in women. Findings may aid in the development of treatments that will enhance women's mental health outcomes following trauma.
Interventions
Estradiol (E2) patches at a dose of 100ug will be applied 24-48 hours before the MRI scan is performed.
Placebo patch identical to the estradiol patch will be applied 24-48 hours before the MRI scan is performed.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Randomization will be double blind, with the key held by the study coordinator in a locked file. The study coordinator will do checks of appropriate enrollment to groups after each 20 participants, but no blind will be broken to individuals analyzing study data. Grady pharmacy services will also hold the randomization schedule, as they will dispense the appropriate patch at the appropriate time point.
Intervention model description
Women will participate in one cycle with the estrogen patch and one cycle with the placebo patch. Each cohort will include 40 participants in each of the three study arms for a total of 240 participants.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* African American women * A menstrual period within the past 60 days * Able and willing to give informed consent * Must have a smart phone and willing to install the Clue app
Exclusion criteria
* Women currently taking any form of hormone-based birth control or other hormonal supplement * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Current psychoactive medication use * Nicotine use or smoking * Hypercoagulable conditions * History of embolism * Current symptoms of psychosis or bipolar disorder * History of major head injury or neurological disorder * Weight \>250lbs (a maximum weight to allow for participants to fit comfortably inside the bore of the MRI machine) and typical physical contraindications for MRI such as metal implants
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Amygdala Response to Fearful Faces Stimuli | Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days) | Responses to threat cues are assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses as participants view 15 blocks each of fearful face and neutral face stimuli, while amygdala reactivity is measured. The amygdala is separated in the right and left hemispheres, and subdivided into the basolateral amygdala and central amygdala. Across voxels in each region a contrast estimate of Fearful \> Neutral faces was extracted. The contrast estimate is a standard reporting format for task-based fMRI data, and reflects the magnitude of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activation difference between two experimental conditions. Contrast estimates are an arbitrary, unitless comparison of fMRI BOLD signal units of one experimental condition versus another (threat vs. neutral stimuli). Higher values indicate greater amygdala reactivity to threat cues (vs. neutral cues), a PTSD-linked response pattern. Negative values indicate stronger amygdala reactivity to neutral cues than threat cues. |
| Amygdala Response to Fear Conditioning Task | Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days) | Indicators of fear conditioning are assessed by fMRI during the fear conditioning tasks. Deficits in fear inhibition have been present in persons with PTSD and during phases of the ovarian cycle. The amygdala is subdivided into the basolateral amygdala and central amygdala. Across voxels in each region a contrast estimate of conditioned stimulation (CS)+ (conditioned threat cues) \> CS- (conditioned safety cues) was extracted. The contrast estimate reflects the magnitude of BOLD activation difference between two experimental conditions. Contrast estimates are an arbitrary, unitless comparison of fMRI BOLD signal units of one experimental condition versus another. Positive values indicate strong responsivity to conditioned threats, which could indicate either fear- or memory-related responses. Strong positive values indicate high responsivity to the conditioned threat (CS+), a pattern often associated with PTSD. Negative values indicate greater responsivity to safety cues (CS-). |
| Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (vmPFC) Activation During the Fear Extinction Task | Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days) | Indicators of fear extinction are assessed by fMRI during the fear extinction tasks. Fear extinction is impaired in persons with PTSD and depends on the vmPFC and its inhibition of amygdala responses to threat stimuli. The vmPFC region is defined using the anatomical boundaries of Brodmann area 25 (BA25). Across voxels in this region, a mean contrast estimate of CS+ \> CS- in late extinction was extracted. The contrast estimate reflects the magnitude of BOLD activation difference between experimental conditions. Contrast estimates are a unitless comparison of fMRI BOLD signal units of one experimental condition versus another. These values indicate responsivity to conditioned threats. For the vmPFC, a positive value often indicates regulation of emotion or fear now that the threat cues have been extinguished. Strong positive values indicate higher engagement of this region to the conditioned threat (CS+). Negative values indicate higher engagement of this region to safety cues (CS-). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) (PCL-5) | Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days) | The severity of self-reported PTSD symptoms will be assessed with the PCL-5. The PCL-5 asks participants to recall the worst stressful event that is currently bothering them the most. Keeping this event in mind, participants respond to 20 questions indicating how bothered they have been by PTSD symptoms. Responses are on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not bothered at all and 4 = extremely bothered. Total raw scores range from 0 to 80 where higher scores indicate greater distress from PTSD symptoms. |
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Early-cycle for Cohort 1 (mean 4.5 (sd=1.5) days following onset of menstrual period) or Mid-cycle for cohort 2 (mean 5.5 (sd=1.4) days following a positive urine luteinizing hormone test) during cycles 2 and 3 (each cycle is an average of 28 days) | The BDI-II is a 21-item instrument assessing depression. Respondents indicate how severe their feelings of depression symptoms are on a scale of 0 (not present) to 3 (most severe). Total raw scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Emory University
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital clinics in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began November 11, 2019 and the final study assessment occurred on April 30, 2025.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 25.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 124 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 21 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 16 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 7 / 21 | 3 / 19 | 6 / 22 | 4 / 21 | 4 / 20 | 5 / 21 | 3 / 14 | 7 / 18 | 1 / 18 | 0 / 19 | 2 / 18 | 2 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 21 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 22 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 21 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 16 |