Skip to content

The ProVerum First in Man PROVE Study

The ProVerum First in Man PROVE Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03972371
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-06-03
Start date
2019-05-13
Completion date
2023-11-27
Last updated
2023-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

A clinical evaluation to assess the safety and performance of the ProVeeTM Urethral Expander System, designed to alleviate the symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

Interventions

DEVICEThe ProVee Urethral Expander System

The ProVee Urethral Expander System is supplied as a single use, sterile device and consists of a nitinol expander implant and custom implant delivery system. The delivery system is designed to allow the implant to be deployed under direct vision.

Sponsors

ProVerum Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, non-randomised, single centre, safety and feasibility study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males ≥ 50 years of age * Moderate-to-severe symptomatic BPH * IPSS of \> 15 * Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) of \<12 mL/s * Prostate volume of ≥ 30 and ≤80 cc * Prostatic urethral lengths ≥ 4cm

Exclusion criteria

* A prostatic urethral length of less than 4cm * A prostatic volume \<30cc or \>80cc * An obstructing intravesical prostatic median lobe * Urinary incontinence due to an incompetent external sphincter * Urethral pathologies that may prevent insertion of delivery system * A current symptomatic urinary tract infection * Current significant visible haematuria * Patients with known allergy to nickel or titanium * History of significant medical co-morbidity or prior surgery that may confound the results of the Study * Another medical condition that would pose an unacceptable patient risk * Known or suspected urological condition that may affected voiding function * Neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities * Patients with cognitive disabilities unable to understand and give informed consent to the research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deployment of the ImplantImmediately after the implant deployment procedureSuccessful deployment of the implant from the delivery system in the target location within the prostatic urethra, as assessed with post deployment endoscopy
Expansion of the ImplantWithin 24 hours of the implant deployment procedureSuccessful deployment of the implant from the delivery system in the target location within the prostatic urethra, as assessed with post deployment CT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of complications e.g. difficulty with urination, related to the implant use peri-procedurally and in the immediate follow up periodImmediately after the implant deployment procedure, within 24 hours
Rate of complications e.g. pain, difficulty with urination, related to the implant throughout the follow-up period of 2 years2 years
Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the procedure in alleviating LUTS voiding symptoms2 yearsChange in symptom score using the Improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life score instrument within the 2 year follow up period
Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the procedure in improving urinary flow2 yearsChange in Qmax measurement within the 2 year follow up period

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026