Skip to content

Neural Gliding Exercise for Low Back Pain

Comparison of Conservative Treatment With and Without Neural Gliding Exercise for Patients With Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03972085
Enrollment
41
Registered
2019-06-03
Start date
2015-02-01
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2019-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low Back Pain, Neurodynamics

Brief summary

Low back pain is a very common problem that causes pain, disability, gait and balance problems. Neurodynamic techniques is used for treatment of low back pain. The aim of the study is comparing the effects of electrotherapy and neural mobilization techniques on pain, functionality, gait and balance.

Detailed description

There are many physiotherapy modalities in the treatment of low back pain (LBP). Electrotherapy procedures, manual therapy techniques, kinesiotherapy and specific exercises are among those that are frequently used. In neural mobilization techniques, which began to gain popularity in 1990s, neural tissue and the surrounding structures are glided or tensioned to mobilize them. Neural mobilization is thought to have a positive effect on symptoms by inducing intraneural circulation, axoplasmic flow, and neural visco-elasticity and sensitivity associated with the connective tissue. There are studies in which this modality has yielded therapeutic success in terms of both pain and functionality, particularly in lumbar region and lower limb disorders where neural mechanosensitivity is increased.

Interventions

Neural gliding exercises: In addition to the Electrotherapy procedure, patients were asked to actively perform knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion and head extension in the slumped posture followed by simultaneous ankle plantar flexion together with knee and head flexion (10 repetitions in 1 minute). Patients performed the exercises under a home-based program for 5 days of the week during a total period of 3 weeks. Electrotherapy sessions: Local Hot Pack (30 minutes), Chattanoga™ TENS (20 minutes, 80-180 Hz frequency, 50-100 wavelength) and Chattanoga™ ultrasound (1 Mhz frequency, 3 W/cm2 3 minutes) were applied for 5 days per week during a total period of 3 weeks. Subjects in ETG did not do any other exercise approach.

OTHERElectrotherapy sessions

Electrotherapy sessions: Local Hot Pack (30 minutes), Chattanoga™ TENS (20 minutes, 80-180 Hz frequency, 50-100 wavelength) and Chattanoga™ ultrasound (1 Mhz frequency, 3 W/cm2 3 minutes) were applied for 5 days per week during a total period of 3 weeks. Subjects in ETG did not do any other exercise approach.

Sponsors

Kutahya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects scoring below 70 degrees in the straight leg raise test * received no physiotherapy until at least 6 months before initial evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* subjects who were unable to walk independently, * who had systemic diseases besides LBP, * who underwent spinal and lower limb surgery, * who scored above 70 degrees in the straight leg raise test, * used analgesics within 48 hours before initial evaluation were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain levels3 weeksThe VAS was used to assess the participants' pain levels. In the VAS, patients are asked to mark the severity of their pain on a scale from 0 to 10. The VAS ranges from '0' representing no pain and '10' representing the worst pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index3 weeksThe self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026