Skip to content

MRI - Guided Adaptive RadioTHerapy for Reducing XerostomiA in Head and Neck Cancer (MARTHA-trial)

MARTHA-trial: MRI - Guided Adaptive RadioTHerapy for Reducing XerostomiA in Head and Neck Cancer Including Longitudinal Evaluation of the Patient's Immune Profile Under Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03972072
Acronym
MARTHA
Enrollment
49
Registered
2019-06-03
Start date
2019-10-15
Completion date
2026-07-24
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer, Xerostomia Due to Radiotherapy

Brief summary

Radiotherapy is the main treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Many advances regarding tumor control and patient survival have been made over the past decades. However, treatment-induced toxicity remains a crucial problem, leading to reduced quality of life and permanent impairment for many survivors. Xerostomia is up to this day the leading cause of late toxicity for these patients. Toxicity has been reduced by implementation of modern image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), but the low soft-tissue contrast of routine x-ray image guidance does not allow exact planning adaptation and daily imaging is associated with high radiation exposure. Furthermore, despite the routinely use of IMRT, rates of clinically relevant xerostomia (i.e. grade 2 or worse) are still common and reported in approximately 38%. Recently developed hybrid machines (MRidian®-CE approval since 2016), consisting of a linear accelerator and an integrated low-field MRI, could allow a) better visualization of tumor and organs at risk, such as parotid glands during patient positioning and daily treatment, b) daily imaging without additional radiation exposure, c) narrowest established safety margins for the treatment volumes, and finally d) repetitive adaptation of target volumes according to changes in patient weight and tumor anatomy during the radiotherapy course. These procedures would facilitate a high-precision treatment and help reduce dose exposure of critical structures.

Interventions

OTHERPre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocol

daily MR-imaging/MR guided radiotherapy once weekly offline plan adaptation to a total of 6

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTsalivary flow measurements

baseline, 6 month-, 12 month- and 24 month-follow up salivary flow measurements and LENT-SOMA subjective/objective evaluation of xerostomia

Sponsors

Panagiotis Balermpas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity oro- or hypopharynx or larynx, Stages II-IVB, requiring definitive or postoperative bilateral neck irradiation * Age ≥ 18 years, no upper age limit * ECOG-Performance score \< 2 * The trial is open to both genders * History/physical examination within 30 days prior to registration by head and neck surgeon and Radiation Oncologist * FDG-PET-CT-scan within 30 days prior to registration

Exclusion criteria

* Not adequately controlled hepatitis or HIV disease (HIV-viral load detectable) * Second non-controlled malignancy other than basalioma or cervical/genital/anal in situ neoplasia during the last 2 years before enrollment * Bilirubin \> 2,0 mg/dl, SGOT, SGPT, AP, Gamma-GT \>3x norm, GFR \< 30 ml/min * leucocytes \<3,5 x 10\^9/l or platelets \< 100 x 10\^9/l or neutrophiles \< 1,5 x 10\^9/l * Other severe comorbidities or psychic disorders (e.g. myocardial infraction within 6 months prior to registration, permanent cardiac arrhythmia, COPD Gold IV, hepatitis B/C, schizophrenia, ongoing alcohol abuse etc.) * Lactating and pregnant women * Previous radiotherapy of the neck * Contraindications for MRI (e.g. pacemaker/ICD, tattoos, cochlear or other not MR-compatible implants) * Pre-existing salivary gland disease (e.g. Sjorgen's-syndrome) or xerostomia-inducing medication (e.g. anticholinergic medication like tricyclic antidepressant) * Claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with xerostomia of grade 2 or worse12 month-follow upwill be evaluated by the LENT-SOMA (Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA)) side-effect scale: SOM (1)-(4) (higher score represents higher grade xerostomia), A: objective flow measurement (1) 76-95%, (2) 51-75%, (3) 26-50%, (4) 0-25%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with xerostomia of grade 2 or worse6- and 24-months follow upwill be evaluated by the LENT-SOMA (Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA)) side-effect scale: SOM (1)-(4) (higher score represents higher grade xerostomia), A: objective flow measurement (1) 76-95%, (2) 51-75%, (3) 26-50%, (4) 0-25%
Locoregional control rate as defined from treatment start to histologically confirmed tumor progression, persistence or last follow up2-yearsas defined from treatment start to histologically confirmed tumor progression, persistence or last follow up
Overall survival2-yearsas defined from treatment start to death from any cause or last follow up
Description of Quality of life - scoring 6 months after treatment, assessed according to the general EORTC-quality of life "core" questionnaire QLQ C30 (overall quality of life for cancer patients)6 months after treatmentQuestionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Description of Head-Neck cancer related symptoms 6 months after treatment, assessed according to the specific EORT-head and neck quality of life supplementary questionnaire HN356 months after treatmenttotal scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics
Description of Quality of life - scoring 12 months after treatment, assessed according to the general EORTC-quality of life "core" questionnaire QLQ C30 (overall quality of life for cancer patients)12 months after treatmentQuestionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Description of Head-Neck related symptoms 12 months after treatment, assessed according to the specific EORT-head and neck quality of life supplementary questionnaire HN3512 months after treatmenttotal scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics
Description of Quality of life - scoring 24 months after treatment, assessed according to the general EORTC-quality of life "core" questionnaire QLQ C30 (overall quality of life for cancer patients)24 months after treatmentQuestionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Description of Head-Neck related symptoms 24 months after treatment, assessed according to the specific EORT-head and neck quality of life supplementary questionnaire HN3524 months after treatmenttotal scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics
Toxicity ratesweekly during radiotherapy and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 monthsevaluated by the CTCAE v5-questionnaires

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPanagiotis Balermpas, M.D.

University Hospital Zurich, Department of Radiation-Oncology

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026